Cargando…
The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment
INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the government of Tanzania launched an effort to strengthen the quality of postabortion care (PAC), an integrated health service that includes treatment for abortion complications and provision of family planning counseling and voluntary services, in 25 facilities in mainland...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Global Health: Science and Practice
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455627 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00050 |
_version_ | 1783446546126209024 |
---|---|
author | Yegon, Erick Ominde, Japheth Baynes, Colin Ngadaya, Esther Kahando, Rehema Kahwa, Justin Lusiola, Grace |
author_facet | Yegon, Erick Ominde, Japheth Baynes, Colin Ngadaya, Esther Kahando, Rehema Kahwa, Justin Lusiola, Grace |
author_sort | Yegon, Erick |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the government of Tanzania launched an effort to strengthen the quality of postabortion care (PAC), an integrated health service that includes treatment for abortion complications and provision of family planning counseling and voluntary services, in 25 facilities in mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar. METHODS: To help guide the government’s initiative, we conducted a mixed-method study in 2016 using health facility surveys and in-depth interviews with health care workers that offer PAC. Surveys of the 25 facilities assessed the current use of services and readiness to deliver them. Provider performance in PAC was assessed through direct observation of client-provider interactions. In-depth interviews (IDIs) with 30 staff from the facilities provided qualitative information on priorities for PAC quality improvement. RESULTS: In the 6 months preceding the study, 2,175 PAC clients sought care at the facilities. Of these PAC clients, 55% chose a family planning method, of whom 6% chose a voluntary long-acting reversible contraceptive. The median facility PAC readiness scores were 45% for health centers, 49% for district hospitals, and 61% for regional referral hospitals. Direct observations of manual vacuum aspiration provision for PAC revealed that providers implemented, on average, 69% of the critical clinical steps. For misoprostol provision, PAC providers implemented, on average, 42% of the critical steps. Multilevel influences affected PAC providers’ work, often adversely, by shaping their confidence in their technical competency, confusing their role as health care workers and as clients’ peers, and coloring their attitudes toward clientele. The PAC providers also felt that their ability to implement their responsibilities was shaped by lapses in essential support and functionality of the health care system, as well as by social and cultural norms. CONCLUSIONS: Technical assistance approaches that blend training, clinical quality improvement, systems strengthening, and social interventions that address demand-side barriers are needed to ensure providers achieve their potential and are able to deliver high-quality PAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6711628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Global Health: Science and Practice |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67116282019-08-28 The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment Yegon, Erick Ominde, Japheth Baynes, Colin Ngadaya, Esther Kahando, Rehema Kahwa, Justin Lusiola, Grace Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the government of Tanzania launched an effort to strengthen the quality of postabortion care (PAC), an integrated health service that includes treatment for abortion complications and provision of family planning counseling and voluntary services, in 25 facilities in mainland Tanzania and in Zanzibar. METHODS: To help guide the government’s initiative, we conducted a mixed-method study in 2016 using health facility surveys and in-depth interviews with health care workers that offer PAC. Surveys of the 25 facilities assessed the current use of services and readiness to deliver them. Provider performance in PAC was assessed through direct observation of client-provider interactions. In-depth interviews (IDIs) with 30 staff from the facilities provided qualitative information on priorities for PAC quality improvement. RESULTS: In the 6 months preceding the study, 2,175 PAC clients sought care at the facilities. Of these PAC clients, 55% chose a family planning method, of whom 6% chose a voluntary long-acting reversible contraceptive. The median facility PAC readiness scores were 45% for health centers, 49% for district hospitals, and 61% for regional referral hospitals. Direct observations of manual vacuum aspiration provision for PAC revealed that providers implemented, on average, 69% of the critical clinical steps. For misoprostol provision, PAC providers implemented, on average, 42% of the critical steps. Multilevel influences affected PAC providers’ work, often adversely, by shaping their confidence in their technical competency, confusing their role as health care workers and as clients’ peers, and coloring their attitudes toward clientele. The PAC providers also felt that their ability to implement their responsibilities was shaped by lapses in essential support and functionality of the health care system, as well as by social and cultural norms. CONCLUSIONS: Technical assistance approaches that blend training, clinical quality improvement, systems strengthening, and social interventions that address demand-side barriers are needed to ensure providers achieve their potential and are able to deliver high-quality PAC. Global Health: Science and Practice 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6711628/ /pubmed/31455627 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00050 Text en © Yegon et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00050 |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yegon, Erick Ominde, Japheth Baynes, Colin Ngadaya, Esther Kahando, Rehema Kahwa, Justin Lusiola, Grace The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title | The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title_full | The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title_fullStr | The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title_short | The Quality of Postabortion Care in Tanzania: Service Provider Perspectives and Results From a Service Readiness Assessment |
title_sort | quality of postabortion care in tanzania: service provider perspectives and results from a service readiness assessment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455627 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yegonerick thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT omindejapheth thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT baynescolin thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT ngadayaesther thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT kahandorehema thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT kahwajustin thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT lusiolagrace thequalityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT yegonerick qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT omindejapheth qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT baynescolin qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT ngadayaesther qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT kahandorehema qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT kahwajustin qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment AT lusiolagrace qualityofpostabortioncareintanzaniaserviceproviderperspectivesandresultsfromaservicereadinessassessment |