Cargando…
Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication
The potential for biopolymers to evolve new structures has important consequences for their ability to optimize function and our attempts to reconstruct their evolutionary histories. Prior work with in vitro systems suggests that structural remodeling of RNA is difficult to achieve through the accum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-019-09906-3 |
_version_ | 1783446587917205504 |
---|---|
author | Plebanek, Andrew Larnerd, Caleb Popović, Milena Wei, Chenyu Pohorille, Andrew Ditzler, Mark A. |
author_facet | Plebanek, Andrew Larnerd, Caleb Popović, Milena Wei, Chenyu Pohorille, Andrew Ditzler, Mark A. |
author_sort | Plebanek, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The potential for biopolymers to evolve new structures has important consequences for their ability to optimize function and our attempts to reconstruct their evolutionary histories. Prior work with in vitro systems suggests that structural remodeling of RNA is difficult to achieve through the accumulation of point mutations or through recombination events. Sequence duplication may represent an alternative mechanism that can more readily lead to the evolution of new structures. Structural and sequence elements in many RNAs and proteins appear to be the products of duplication events, indicating that this mechanism plays a major role in molecular evolution. Despite the potential significance of this mechanism, little experimental data is available concerning the structural and evolutionary consequences of duplicating biopolymer sequences. To assess the structural consequences of sequence duplication on the evolution of RNA, we mutagenized an RNA sequence containing two copies of an ATP aptamer and subjected the resulting population to multiple in vitro evolution experiments. We identified multiple routes by which duplication, followed by the accumulation of functional point mutations, allowed our populations to sample two entirely different secondary structures. The two structures have no base pairs in common, but both structures contain two copies of the same ATP-binding motif. We do not observe the emergence of any other functional secondary structures beyond these two. Although this result suggests a limited capacity for duplication to support short-term functional innovation, major changes in secondary structure, like the one observed here, should be given careful consideration as they are likely to frustrate attempts to infer deep evolutionary histories of functional RNAs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00239-019-09906-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6711949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67119492019-09-13 Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication Plebanek, Andrew Larnerd, Caleb Popović, Milena Wei, Chenyu Pohorille, Andrew Ditzler, Mark A. J Mol Evol Original Article The potential for biopolymers to evolve new structures has important consequences for their ability to optimize function and our attempts to reconstruct their evolutionary histories. Prior work with in vitro systems suggests that structural remodeling of RNA is difficult to achieve through the accumulation of point mutations or through recombination events. Sequence duplication may represent an alternative mechanism that can more readily lead to the evolution of new structures. Structural and sequence elements in many RNAs and proteins appear to be the products of duplication events, indicating that this mechanism plays a major role in molecular evolution. Despite the potential significance of this mechanism, little experimental data is available concerning the structural and evolutionary consequences of duplicating biopolymer sequences. To assess the structural consequences of sequence duplication on the evolution of RNA, we mutagenized an RNA sequence containing two copies of an ATP aptamer and subjected the resulting population to multiple in vitro evolution experiments. We identified multiple routes by which duplication, followed by the accumulation of functional point mutations, allowed our populations to sample two entirely different secondary structures. The two structures have no base pairs in common, but both structures contain two copies of the same ATP-binding motif. We do not observe the emergence of any other functional secondary structures beyond these two. Although this result suggests a limited capacity for duplication to support short-term functional innovation, major changes in secondary structure, like the one observed here, should be given careful consideration as they are likely to frustrate attempts to infer deep evolutionary histories of functional RNAs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00239-019-09906-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-08-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6711949/ /pubmed/31435687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-019-09906-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Plebanek, Andrew Larnerd, Caleb Popović, Milena Wei, Chenyu Pohorille, Andrew Ditzler, Mark A. Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title | Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title_full | Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title_fullStr | Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title_full_unstemmed | Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title_short | Big on Change, Small on Innovation: Evolutionary Consequences of RNA Sequence Duplication |
title_sort | big on change, small on innovation: evolutionary consequences of rna sequence duplication |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6711949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00239-019-09906-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plebanekandrew bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication AT larnerdcaleb bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication AT popovicmilena bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication AT weichenyu bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication AT pohorilleandrew bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication AT ditzlermarka bigonchangesmalloninnovationevolutionaryconsequencesofrnasequenceduplication |