Cargando…

Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation

OBJECTIVE: Determine the occurrence rate of cochlear implant (CI) electrode tip fold-over and electrode scalar deviation as reported in patient cases with different commercial electrode types. DATA-SOURCES: PubMed search for identifying peer-reviewed articles published till 2018 on CI electrode tip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhanasingh, Anandhan, Jolly, Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chinese PLA General Hospital 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2019.01.002
_version_ 1783446649168723968
author Dhanasingh, Anandhan
Jolly, Claude
author_facet Dhanasingh, Anandhan
Jolly, Claude
author_sort Dhanasingh, Anandhan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Determine the occurrence rate of cochlear implant (CI) electrode tip fold-over and electrode scalar deviation as reported in patient cases with different commercial electrode types. DATA-SOURCES: PubMed search for identifying peer-reviewed articles published till 2018 on CI electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Key-words for searching were “Cochlear electrode tip fold-over”, “Cochlear electrode scalar position” and “Cochlear electrode scalar location”. ARTICLES-SELECTION: Only if electrode related issues were investigated in patient cases. 38 articles met the inclusion-criteria. RESULTS: 13 articles on electrode tip fold-over issue covering 3177 implanted ears, out of which 50 ears were identified with electrode tip fold-over with an occurrence rate of 1.57%. Out of 50 ears, 43 were implanted with pre-curved electrodes and the remaining 7 with lateral-wall electrodes. One article reported on both tip fold-over and scalar deviation. 26 articles reported on the electrode scalar deviation covering an overall number of 2046 ears out of which, 458 were identified with electrode scalar deviation at a rate of 22.38%. After removing the studies that did not report on the number of electrodes per electrode type, it was 1324 ears implanted with pre-curved electrode and 507 ears with lateral-wall electrode. Out of 1324 pre-curved electrode implanted ears, 424 were reported with scalar deviation making an occurrence rate of 32%. Out of 507 lateral-wall electrode implanted ears, 43 were associated with scalar deviation at an occurrence rate of 6.7%. CONCLUSION: This literature review revealing the fact of higher rate of electrode insertion trauma associated with pre-curved electrode type irrespective of CI brand is one step closer to obsolete it from the clinical practice in the interest of patient's cochlear health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6712287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Chinese PLA General Hospital
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67122872019-08-29 Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation Dhanasingh, Anandhan Jolly, Claude J Otol Review Article OBJECTIVE: Determine the occurrence rate of cochlear implant (CI) electrode tip fold-over and electrode scalar deviation as reported in patient cases with different commercial electrode types. DATA-SOURCES: PubMed search for identifying peer-reviewed articles published till 2018 on CI electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Key-words for searching were “Cochlear electrode tip fold-over”, “Cochlear electrode scalar position” and “Cochlear electrode scalar location”. ARTICLES-SELECTION: Only if electrode related issues were investigated in patient cases. 38 articles met the inclusion-criteria. RESULTS: 13 articles on electrode tip fold-over issue covering 3177 implanted ears, out of which 50 ears were identified with electrode tip fold-over with an occurrence rate of 1.57%. Out of 50 ears, 43 were implanted with pre-curved electrodes and the remaining 7 with lateral-wall electrodes. One article reported on both tip fold-over and scalar deviation. 26 articles reported on the electrode scalar deviation covering an overall number of 2046 ears out of which, 458 were identified with electrode scalar deviation at a rate of 22.38%. After removing the studies that did not report on the number of electrodes per electrode type, it was 1324 ears implanted with pre-curved electrode and 507 ears with lateral-wall electrode. Out of 1324 pre-curved electrode implanted ears, 424 were reported with scalar deviation making an occurrence rate of 32%. Out of 507 lateral-wall electrode implanted ears, 43 were associated with scalar deviation at an occurrence rate of 6.7%. CONCLUSION: This literature review revealing the fact of higher rate of electrode insertion trauma associated with pre-curved electrode type irrespective of CI brand is one step closer to obsolete it from the clinical practice in the interest of patient's cochlear health. Chinese PLA General Hospital 2019-09 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6712287/ /pubmed/31467506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2019.01.002 Text en © 2019 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Dhanasingh, Anandhan
Jolly, Claude
Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title_full Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title_fullStr Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title_full_unstemmed Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title_short Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
title_sort review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31467506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2019.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT dhanasinghanandhan reviewoncochlearimplantelectrodearraytipfoldoverandscalardeviation
AT jollyclaude reviewoncochlearimplantelectrodearraytipfoldoverandscalardeviation