Cargando…
A clinical, proteomics, and artificial intelligence‐driven model to predict acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary angiography
BACKGROUND: Standard measures of kidney function are only modestly useful for accurate prediction of risk for acute kidney injury (AKI). HYPOTHESIS: Clinical and biomarker data can predict AKI more accurately. METHODS: Using Luminex xMAP technology, we measured 109 biomarkers in blood from 889 patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23143 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Standard measures of kidney function are only modestly useful for accurate prediction of risk for acute kidney injury (AKI). HYPOTHESIS: Clinical and biomarker data can predict AKI more accurately. METHODS: Using Luminex xMAP technology, we measured 109 biomarkers in blood from 889 patients prior to undergoing coronary angiography. Procedural AKI was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL, a percentage increase in serum creatinine of ≥50%, or a reduction in urine output (documented oliguria of <0.5 mL/kg per hour for >6 hours) within 7 days after contrast exposure. Clinical and biomarker predictors of AKI were identified using machine learning and a final prognostic model was developed with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). RESULTS: Forty‐three (4.8%) patients developed procedural AKI. Six predictors were present in the final model: four (history of diabetes, blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio, C‐reactive protein, and osteopontin) had a positive association with AKI risk, while two (CD5 antigen‐like and Factor VII) had a negative association with AKI risk. The final model had a cross‐validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.79 for predicting procedural AKI, and an in‐sample AUC of 0.82 (P < 0.001). The optimal score cutoff had 77% sensitivity, 75% specificity, and a negative predictive value of 98% for procedural AKI. An elevated score was predictive of procedural AKI in all subjects (odds ratio = 9.87; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We describe a clinical and proteomics‐supported biomarker model with high accuracy for predicting procedural AKI in patients undergoing coronary angiography. |
---|