Cargando…
Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation
BACKGROUND: The renin‐angiotensin system plays an important role in promoting atherosclerotic plaque inflammation, which may be inhibited by angiotension‐II receptor blockers. HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the effects of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30537083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23133 |
_version_ | 1783446657197670400 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Minyoung Lee, Cheol Whan Ahn, Jung‐Min Park, Duk‐Woo Kang, Soo‐Jin Lee, Seung‐Whan Kim, Young‐Hak Moon, Dae Hyuk Park, Seong‐Wook Park, Seung‐Jung |
author_facet | Oh, Minyoung Lee, Cheol Whan Ahn, Jung‐Min Park, Duk‐Woo Kang, Soo‐Jin Lee, Seung‐Whan Kim, Young‐Hak Moon, Dae Hyuk Park, Seong‐Wook Park, Seung‐Jung |
author_sort | Oh, Minyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The renin‐angiotensin system plays an important role in promoting atherosclerotic plaque inflammation, which may be inhibited by angiotension‐II receptor blockers. HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the effects of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation using (18)F‐fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. METHODS: Fifty patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and at least one lesion with (18)FDG uptake in the carotid artery (target‐to‐background ratio [TBR] ≥ 1.6) were randomly assigned to receive either fimasartan (60 mg once a day) or amlodipine (5 mg once a day). (18)FDG PET examinations were performed in all patients at baseline and 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percent change in the index vessel TBR for the most diseased segment (MDS TBR). RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. At the 6‐month follow‐up, index vessel and aorta MDS TBR significantly decreased in both groups. However, the percent change in index vessel MDS TBR was similar between the two groups (−9.33 ± 14.2% vs −7.73 ± 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.9). No significant difference was found for the percent change in the whole vessel TBR for the index vessel between the two groups, with similar findings for changes in MDS TBR or whole vessel TBR for the aorta. Total cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and blood pressure improved to a similar degree in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fimasartan and amlodipine reduce carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation similarly in patients with ACS, offering the same level of effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6712325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67123252019-08-28 Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation Oh, Minyoung Lee, Cheol Whan Ahn, Jung‐Min Park, Duk‐Woo Kang, Soo‐Jin Lee, Seung‐Whan Kim, Young‐Hak Moon, Dae Hyuk Park, Seong‐Wook Park, Seung‐Jung Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: The renin‐angiotensin system plays an important role in promoting atherosclerotic plaque inflammation, which may be inhibited by angiotension‐II receptor blockers. HYPOTHESIS: We investigated the effects of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation using (18)F‐fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. METHODS: Fifty patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and at least one lesion with (18)FDG uptake in the carotid artery (target‐to‐background ratio [TBR] ≥ 1.6) were randomly assigned to receive either fimasartan (60 mg once a day) or amlodipine (5 mg once a day). (18)FDG PET examinations were performed in all patients at baseline and 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percent change in the index vessel TBR for the most diseased segment (MDS TBR). RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. At the 6‐month follow‐up, index vessel and aorta MDS TBR significantly decreased in both groups. However, the percent change in index vessel MDS TBR was similar between the two groups (−9.33 ± 14.2% vs −7.73 ± 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.9). No significant difference was found for the percent change in the whole vessel TBR for the index vessel between the two groups, with similar findings for changes in MDS TBR or whole vessel TBR for the aorta. Total cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and blood pressure improved to a similar degree in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fimasartan and amlodipine reduce carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation similarly in patients with ACS, offering the same level of effectiveness. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6712325/ /pubmed/30537083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23133 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Oh, Minyoung Lee, Cheol Whan Ahn, Jung‐Min Park, Duk‐Woo Kang, Soo‐Jin Lee, Seung‐Whan Kim, Young‐Hak Moon, Dae Hyuk Park, Seong‐Wook Park, Seung‐Jung Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title | Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title_full | Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title_short | Comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
title_sort | comparison of fimasartan and amlodipine therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque inflammation |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30537083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohminyoung comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT leecheolwhan comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT ahnjungmin comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT parkdukwoo comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT kangsoojin comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT leeseungwhan comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT kimyounghak comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT moondaehyuk comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT parkseongwook comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation AT parkseungjung comparisonoffimasartanandamlodipinetherapyoncarotidatheroscleroticplaqueinflammation |