Cargando…

Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how differences in out of hospital cardiac arrest patient volume affect in‐hospital myocardial infarction (MI) mortality. HYPOTHESIS: Hospitals accepting cardiac arrest transfers will have increased hospital MI mortality. METHODS: MI patients (ST elevation MI [STEMI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontos, Michael C., Fordyce, Christopher B., Chen, Anita Y., Chiswell, Karen, Enriquez, Jonathan R., de Lemos, James, Roe, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23146
_version_ 1783446659976396800
author Kontos, Michael C.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
Chen, Anita Y.
Chiswell, Karen
Enriquez, Jonathan R.
de Lemos, James
Roe, Matthew T.
author_facet Kontos, Michael C.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
Chen, Anita Y.
Chiswell, Karen
Enriquez, Jonathan R.
de Lemos, James
Roe, Matthew T.
author_sort Kontos, Michael C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about how differences in out of hospital cardiac arrest patient volume affect in‐hospital myocardial infarction (MI) mortality. HYPOTHESIS: Hospitals accepting cardiac arrest transfers will have increased hospital MI mortality. METHODS: MI patients (ST elevation MI [STEMI] and non‐ST elevation MI [NSTEMI]) in the Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry were included. Hospital variation of cardiac arrest and temporal trend of the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients were explored. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients, and association between in‐hospital mortality and hospital tertiles of cardiac arrest was compared using logistic regression adjusting for case mix. RESULTS: A total of 252 882 patients from 224 hospitals were included, of whom 9682 (3.8%) had cardiac arrest (1.6% of NSTEMI and 7.5% of STEMI patients). The proportion of MI patients who had cardiac arrest admitted to each hospital was relatively low (median 3.7% [25th, 75th percentiles: 3.0%, 4.5%]).with a range of 4.2% to 12.4% in the high‐volume tertiles. Unadjusted in‐hospital mortality increased with tertile: low 3.8%, intermediate 4.6%, and high 4.7% (P < 0.001); this was no longer significantly different after adjustment (intermediate vs high tertile odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [0.90‐1.16], low vs high tertile OR = 0.93 [0.83, 1.05]). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of MI patients who have cardiac arrest is low. In‐hospital mortality among all MI patients did not differ significantly between hospitals that had increased proportions of cardiac arrest MI patients. For most hospitals, overall MI mortality is unlikely to be adversely affected by treating cardiac arrest patients with MI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6712341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67123412019-08-28 Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry Kontos, Michael C. Fordyce, Christopher B. Chen, Anita Y. Chiswell, Karen Enriquez, Jonathan R. de Lemos, James Roe, Matthew T. Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Little is known about how differences in out of hospital cardiac arrest patient volume affect in‐hospital myocardial infarction (MI) mortality. HYPOTHESIS: Hospitals accepting cardiac arrest transfers will have increased hospital MI mortality. METHODS: MI patients (ST elevation MI [STEMI] and non‐ST elevation MI [NSTEMI]) in the Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry were included. Hospital variation of cardiac arrest and temporal trend of the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients were explored. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients, and association between in‐hospital mortality and hospital tertiles of cardiac arrest was compared using logistic regression adjusting for case mix. RESULTS: A total of 252 882 patients from 224 hospitals were included, of whom 9682 (3.8%) had cardiac arrest (1.6% of NSTEMI and 7.5% of STEMI patients). The proportion of MI patients who had cardiac arrest admitted to each hospital was relatively low (median 3.7% [25th, 75th percentiles: 3.0%, 4.5%]).with a range of 4.2% to 12.4% in the high‐volume tertiles. Unadjusted in‐hospital mortality increased with tertile: low 3.8%, intermediate 4.6%, and high 4.7% (P < 0.001); this was no longer significantly different after adjustment (intermediate vs high tertile odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [0.90‐1.16], low vs high tertile OR = 0.93 [0.83, 1.05]). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of MI patients who have cardiac arrest is low. In‐hospital mortality among all MI patients did not differ significantly between hospitals that had increased proportions of cardiac arrest MI patients. For most hospitals, overall MI mortality is unlikely to be adversely affected by treating cardiac arrest patients with MI. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6712341/ /pubmed/30597584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23146 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Kontos, Michael C.
Fordyce, Christopher B.
Chen, Anita Y.
Chiswell, Karen
Enriquez, Jonathan R.
de Lemos, James
Roe, Matthew T.
Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title_full Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title_fullStr Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title_full_unstemmed Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title_short Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
title_sort association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the united states: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network registry
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23146
work_keys_str_mv AT kontosmichaelc associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT fordycechristopherb associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT chenanitay associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT chiswellkaren associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT enriquezjonathanr associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT delemosjames associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry
AT roematthewt associationofacutemyocardialinfarctioncardiacarrestpatientvolumeandinhospitalmortalityintheunitedstatesinsightsfromthenationalcardiovasculardataregistryacutecoronarytreatmentandinterventionoutcomesnetworkregistry