Cargando…

Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egan, Grace, Robinson, Paula D., Martinez, Juan P. D., Alexander, Sarah, Ammann, Roland A., Dupuis, L. Lee, Fisher, Brian T., Lehrnbecher, Thomas, Phillips, Bob, Cabral, Sandra, Tomlinson, George, Sung, Lillian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31274245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395
_version_ 1783446682245005312
author Egan, Grace
Robinson, Paula D.
Martinez, Juan P. D.
Alexander, Sarah
Ammann, Roland A.
Dupuis, L. Lee
Fisher, Brian T.
Lehrnbecher, Thomas
Phillips, Bob
Cabral, Sandra
Tomlinson, George
Sung, Lillian
author_facet Egan, Grace
Robinson, Paula D.
Martinez, Juan P. D.
Alexander, Sarah
Ammann, Roland A.
Dupuis, L. Lee
Fisher, Brian T.
Lehrnbecher, Thomas
Phillips, Bob
Cabral, Sandra
Tomlinson, George
Sung, Lillian
author_sort Egan, Grace
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE in‐process and Embase; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were HSCT recipients with anticipated neutropenia, and the intervention was systemic antibacterial prophylaxis. Strategies synthesized included fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic; fluoroquinolone vs trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic; and cephalosporin vs. no antibiotic. Fluoroquinolone vs cephalosporin and levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin were compared by network meta‐analysis. Primary outcome was bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 20 984 citations screened, 113 studies comparing prophylactic antibiotic to control were included. The following were effective in reducing bacteremia: fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41‐0.76), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41‐0.85) and cephalosporin vs no antibiotic (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16‐0.58). Fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with increased Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31‐1.24) or invasive fungal disease (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79‐2.08) but did increase resistance to fluoroquinolone among bacteremia isolates (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.03). Heterogeneity in fluoroquinolone effect on bacteremia was not explained by evaluated study, population, or methodological factors. Network meta‐analysis revealed no direct comparisons for pre‐specified analyses; superior regimens were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporin prophylaxis reduced bacteremia. A clinical practice guideline to facilitate prophylactic antibiotic decision‐making is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6712447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67124472019-09-04 Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials Egan, Grace Robinson, Paula D. Martinez, Juan P. D. Alexander, Sarah Ammann, Roland A. Dupuis, L. Lee Fisher, Brian T. Lehrnbecher, Thomas Phillips, Bob Cabral, Sandra Tomlinson, George Sung, Lillian Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE in‐process and Embase; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were HSCT recipients with anticipated neutropenia, and the intervention was systemic antibacterial prophylaxis. Strategies synthesized included fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic; fluoroquinolone vs trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic; and cephalosporin vs. no antibiotic. Fluoroquinolone vs cephalosporin and levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin were compared by network meta‐analysis. Primary outcome was bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 20 984 citations screened, 113 studies comparing prophylactic antibiotic to control were included. The following were effective in reducing bacteremia: fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41‐0.76), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41‐0.85) and cephalosporin vs no antibiotic (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16‐0.58). Fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with increased Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31‐1.24) or invasive fungal disease (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79‐2.08) but did increase resistance to fluoroquinolone among bacteremia isolates (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.03). Heterogeneity in fluoroquinolone effect on bacteremia was not explained by evaluated study, population, or methodological factors. Network meta‐analysis revealed no direct comparisons for pre‐specified analyses; superior regimens were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporin prophylaxis reduced bacteremia. A clinical practice guideline to facilitate prophylactic antibiotic decision‐making is required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6712447/ /pubmed/31274245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Egan, Grace
Robinson, Paula D.
Martinez, Juan P. D.
Alexander, Sarah
Ammann, Roland A.
Dupuis, L. Lee
Fisher, Brian T.
Lehrnbecher, Thomas
Phillips, Bob
Cabral, Sandra
Tomlinson, George
Sung, Lillian
Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title_full Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title_fullStr Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title_short Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
title_sort efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review of randomized trials
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31274245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395
work_keys_str_mv AT egangrace efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT robinsonpaulad efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT martinezjuanpd efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT alexandersarah efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT ammannrolanda efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT dupuisllee efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT fisherbriant efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT lehrnbecherthomas efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT phillipsbob efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT cabralsandra efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT tomlinsongeorge efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials
AT sunglillian efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials