Cargando…
Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31274245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395 |
_version_ | 1783446682245005312 |
---|---|
author | Egan, Grace Robinson, Paula D. Martinez, Juan P. D. Alexander, Sarah Ammann, Roland A. Dupuis, L. Lee Fisher, Brian T. Lehrnbecher, Thomas Phillips, Bob Cabral, Sandra Tomlinson, George Sung, Lillian |
author_facet | Egan, Grace Robinson, Paula D. Martinez, Juan P. D. Alexander, Sarah Ammann, Roland A. Dupuis, L. Lee Fisher, Brian T. Lehrnbecher, Thomas Phillips, Bob Cabral, Sandra Tomlinson, George Sung, Lillian |
author_sort | Egan, Grace |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE in‐process and Embase; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were HSCT recipients with anticipated neutropenia, and the intervention was systemic antibacterial prophylaxis. Strategies synthesized included fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic; fluoroquinolone vs trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic; and cephalosporin vs. no antibiotic. Fluoroquinolone vs cephalosporin and levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin were compared by network meta‐analysis. Primary outcome was bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 20 984 citations screened, 113 studies comparing prophylactic antibiotic to control were included. The following were effective in reducing bacteremia: fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41‐0.76), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41‐0.85) and cephalosporin vs no antibiotic (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16‐0.58). Fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with increased Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31‐1.24) or invasive fungal disease (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79‐2.08) but did increase resistance to fluoroquinolone among bacteremia isolates (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.03). Heterogeneity in fluoroquinolone effect on bacteremia was not explained by evaluated study, population, or methodological factors. Network meta‐analysis revealed no direct comparisons for pre‐specified analyses; superior regimens were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporin prophylaxis reduced bacteremia. A clinical practice guideline to facilitate prophylactic antibiotic decision‐making is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6712447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67124472019-09-04 Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials Egan, Grace Robinson, Paula D. Martinez, Juan P. D. Alexander, Sarah Ammann, Roland A. Dupuis, L. Lee Fisher, Brian T. Lehrnbecher, Thomas Phillips, Bob Cabral, Sandra Tomlinson, George Sung, Lillian Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic systemic antibiotics in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and performed searches of Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE in‐process and Embase; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were HSCT recipients with anticipated neutropenia, and the intervention was systemic antibacterial prophylaxis. Strategies synthesized included fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic; fluoroquinolone vs trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic; and cephalosporin vs. no antibiotic. Fluoroquinolone vs cephalosporin and levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin were compared by network meta‐analysis. Primary outcome was bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 20 984 citations screened, 113 studies comparing prophylactic antibiotic to control were included. The following were effective in reducing bacteremia: fluoroquinolone vs no antibiotic/nonabsorbable antibiotic (risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41‐0.76), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole vs no antibiotic (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41‐0.85) and cephalosporin vs no antibiotic (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16‐0.58). Fluoroquinolone was not significantly associated with increased Clostridium difficile infection (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.31‐1.24) or invasive fungal disease (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79‐2.08) but did increase resistance to fluoroquinolone among bacteremia isolates (RR 3.35, 95% CI 1.12 to 10.03). Heterogeneity in fluoroquinolone effect on bacteremia was not explained by evaluated study, population, or methodological factors. Network meta‐analysis revealed no direct comparisons for pre‐specified analyses; superior regimens were not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone, trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole, and cephalosporin prophylaxis reduced bacteremia. A clinical practice guideline to facilitate prophylactic antibiotic decision‐making is required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6712447/ /pubmed/31274245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Egan, Grace Robinson, Paula D. Martinez, Juan P. D. Alexander, Sarah Ammann, Roland A. Dupuis, L. Lee Fisher, Brian T. Lehrnbecher, Thomas Phillips, Bob Cabral, Sandra Tomlinson, George Sung, Lillian Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title | Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title_full | Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title_short | Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A systematic review of randomized trials |
title_sort | efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review of randomized trials |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31274245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egangrace efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT robinsonpaulad efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT martinezjuanpd efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT alexandersarah efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT ammannrolanda efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT dupuisllee efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT fisherbriant efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT lehrnbecherthomas efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT phillipsbob efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT cabralsandra efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT tomlinsongeorge efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials AT sunglillian efficacyofantibioticprophylaxisinpatientswithcancerandhematopoieticstemcelltransplantationrecipientsasystematicreviewofrandomizedtrials |