Cargando…

A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia

Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballard, Emma, Wang, Claire Y. T., Hien, Tran Tinh, Tong, Nguyen Thanh, Marquart, Louise, Pava, Zuleima, Tarning, Joel, O’Rourke, Peter, McCarthy, James S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3
_version_ 1783446732845088768
author Ballard, Emma
Wang, Claire Y. T.
Hien, Tran Tinh
Tong, Nguyen Thanh
Marquart, Louise
Pava, Zuleima
Tarning, Joel
O’Rourke, Peter
McCarthy, James S.
author_facet Ballard, Emma
Wang, Claire Y. T.
Hien, Tran Tinh
Tong, Nguyen Thanh
Marquart, Louise
Pava, Zuleima
Tarning, Joel
O’Rourke, Peter
McCarthy, James S.
author_sort Ballard, Emma
collection PubMed
description Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy and by 18S qPCR in a phase 2a study. Microscopy positive samples (n = 355; median 810 parasites/μL [IQR 40–10,471]) showed close agreement with 18S qPCR in mean log(10)/mL transformed parasitemia values by paired t test (difference 0.04, 95%CI − 0.01–0.10, p = 0.088). Excellent intraclass correlation (0.97) and no evidence of systematic or proportional differences by Passing–Bablok regression were observed. 18S qPCR appears to give equivalent parasitemia values to microscopy, which indicates 18S qPCR is an appropriate alternative method to quantify parasitemia in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6712708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67127082019-09-04 A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia Ballard, Emma Wang, Claire Y. T. Hien, Tran Tinh Tong, Nguyen Thanh Marquart, Louise Pava, Zuleima Tarning, Joel O’Rourke, Peter McCarthy, James S. Trop Med Health Short Report Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy and by 18S qPCR in a phase 2a study. Microscopy positive samples (n = 355; median 810 parasites/μL [IQR 40–10,471]) showed close agreement with 18S qPCR in mean log(10)/mL transformed parasitemia values by paired t test (difference 0.04, 95%CI − 0.01–0.10, p = 0.088). Excellent intraclass correlation (0.97) and no evidence of systematic or proportional differences by Passing–Bablok regression were observed. 18S qPCR appears to give equivalent parasitemia values to microscopy, which indicates 18S qPCR is an appropriate alternative method to quantify parasitemia in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6712708/ /pubmed/31485189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Ballard, Emma
Wang, Claire Y. T.
Hien, Tran Tinh
Tong, Nguyen Thanh
Marquart, Louise
Pava, Zuleima
Tarning, Joel
O’Rourke, Peter
McCarthy, James S.
A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title_full A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title_fullStr A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title_full_unstemmed A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title_short A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
title_sort validation study of microscopy versus quantitative pcr for measuring plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ballardemma avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT wangclaireyt avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT hientrantinh avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT tongnguyenthanh avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT marquartlouise avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT pavazuleima avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT tarningjoel avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT orourkepeter avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT mccarthyjamess avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT ballardemma validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT wangclaireyt validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT hientrantinh validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT tongnguyenthanh validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT marquartlouise validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT pavazuleima validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT tarningjoel validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT orourkepeter validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia
AT mccarthyjamess validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia