Cargando…
A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia
Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3 |
_version_ | 1783446732845088768 |
---|---|
author | Ballard, Emma Wang, Claire Y. T. Hien, Tran Tinh Tong, Nguyen Thanh Marquart, Louise Pava, Zuleima Tarning, Joel O’Rourke, Peter McCarthy, James S. |
author_facet | Ballard, Emma Wang, Claire Y. T. Hien, Tran Tinh Tong, Nguyen Thanh Marquart, Louise Pava, Zuleima Tarning, Joel O’Rourke, Peter McCarthy, James S. |
author_sort | Ballard, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy and by 18S qPCR in a phase 2a study. Microscopy positive samples (n = 355; median 810 parasites/μL [IQR 40–10,471]) showed close agreement with 18S qPCR in mean log(10)/mL transformed parasitemia values by paired t test (difference 0.04, 95%CI − 0.01–0.10, p = 0.088). Excellent intraclass correlation (0.97) and no evidence of systematic or proportional differences by Passing–Bablok regression were observed. 18S qPCR appears to give equivalent parasitemia values to microscopy, which indicates 18S qPCR is an appropriate alternative method to quantify parasitemia in clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6712708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67127082019-09-04 A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia Ballard, Emma Wang, Claire Y. T. Hien, Tran Tinh Tong, Nguyen Thanh Marquart, Louise Pava, Zuleima Tarning, Joel O’Rourke, Peter McCarthy, James S. Trop Med Health Short Report Microscopy and 18S qPCR are the most common and field-friendly methods for quantifying malaria parasite density, and it is important that these methods can be interpreted as giving equivalent results. We compared results of quantitative measurement of Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia by microscopy and by 18S qPCR in a phase 2a study. Microscopy positive samples (n = 355; median 810 parasites/μL [IQR 40–10,471]) showed close agreement with 18S qPCR in mean log(10)/mL transformed parasitemia values by paired t test (difference 0.04, 95%CI − 0.01–0.10, p = 0.088). Excellent intraclass correlation (0.97) and no evidence of systematic or proportional differences by Passing–Bablok regression were observed. 18S qPCR appears to give equivalent parasitemia values to microscopy, which indicates 18S qPCR is an appropriate alternative method to quantify parasitemia in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6712708/ /pubmed/31485189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Ballard, Emma Wang, Claire Y. T. Hien, Tran Tinh Tong, Nguyen Thanh Marquart, Louise Pava, Zuleima Tarning, Joel O’Rourke, Peter McCarthy, James S. A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title | A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title_full | A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title_fullStr | A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title_full_unstemmed | A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title_short | A validation study of microscopy versus quantitative PCR for measuring Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
title_sort | validation study of microscopy versus quantitative pcr for measuring plasmodium falciparum parasitemia |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0176-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballardemma avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT wangclaireyt avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT hientrantinh avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT tongnguyenthanh avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT marquartlouise avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT pavazuleima avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT tarningjoel avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT orourkepeter avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT mccarthyjamess avalidationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT ballardemma validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT wangclaireyt validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT hientrantinh validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT tongnguyenthanh validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT marquartlouise validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT pavazuleima validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT tarningjoel validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT orourkepeter validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia AT mccarthyjamess validationstudyofmicroscopyversusquantitativepcrformeasuringplasmodiumfalciparumparasitemia |