Cargando…

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor occurs in greater than 22% of all pregnancies in the United States. Previous studies have shown that misoprostol is more effective for induction than oxytocin or dinoprostone alone. The World Health Organization recommends vaginal misoprostol 25mcg every 6 hours and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Harman Crowell, Elizabeth H., Crowell, Alexander M., Theiler, Regan N.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2454-9

Ejemplares similares

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
por: Hallén, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study
por: Anjali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Analysis of Variables that Influence the Success Rates of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol: A Retrospective Observational Study
por: Corrêa, Thayane Delazari, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil
por: Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Induction of Labor in Primigravid Term Pregnancy with Misoprostol or Dinoprostone: A Comparative Study
por: Arif, Rizwana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
por: Stephenson, Megan L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix
por: Kashanian, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
por: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks
por: Sire, Flavie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Women’s experiences and views of outpatient and inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A secondary qualitative study
por: Hægeland, Hanne A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies
por: Rahimi, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of maternal age and body mass index on induction of labor with oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membrane at term: A retrospective cross-sectional study
por: Sfregola, Gianfranco, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Jahromi, Bahia Namavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
por: Zhang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol, Intravenous Oxytocin, and Intravaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Pakistani Women
por: Wasim, Asad Ullah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour
por: Weeks, AD, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of vaginal washing before Misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: A randomized single‐blind clinical trial
por: Kabodmehri, Roya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_n78m8kb9s2et4jbvvfj064looo