Cargando…
Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is commonly used in epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal exposures. Accounting for cell type composition is critical in such studies as it reduces confounding due to the cell specificity of DNA methylation (DNAm). In the absence of cell sorting inform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y |
_version_ | 1783446770408226816 |
---|---|
author | Gervin, Kristina Salas, Lucas A. Bakulski, Kelly M. van Zelm, Menno C. Koestler, Devin C. Wiencke, John K. Duijts, Liesbeth Moll, Henriëtte A. Kelsey, Karl T. Kobor, Michael S. Lyle, Robert Christensen, Brock C. Felix, Janine F. Jones, Meaghan J. |
author_facet | Gervin, Kristina Salas, Lucas A. Bakulski, Kelly M. van Zelm, Menno C. Koestler, Devin C. Wiencke, John K. Duijts, Liesbeth Moll, Henriëtte A. Kelsey, Karl T. Kobor, Michael S. Lyle, Robert Christensen, Brock C. Felix, Janine F. Jones, Meaghan J. |
author_sort | Gervin, Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is commonly used in epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal exposures. Accounting for cell type composition is critical in such studies as it reduces confounding due to the cell specificity of DNA methylation (DNAm). In the absence of cell sorting information, statistical methods can be applied to deconvolve heterogeneous cell mixtures. Among these methods, reference-based approaches leverage age-appropriate cell-specific DNAm profiles to estimate cellular composition. In UCB, four reference datasets comprising DNAm signatures profiled in purified cell populations have been published using the Illumina 450 K and EPIC arrays. These datasets are biologically and technically different, and currently, there is no consensus on how to best apply them. Here, we systematically evaluate and compare these datasets and provide recommendations for reference-based UCB deconvolution. RESULTS: We first evaluated the four reference datasets to ascertain both the purity of the samples and the potential cell cross-contamination. We filtered samples and combined datasets to obtain a joint UCB reference. We selected deconvolution libraries using two different approaches: automatic selection using the top differentially methylated probes from the function pickCompProbes in minfi and a standardized library selected using the IDOL (Identifying Optimal Libraries) iterative algorithm. We compared the performance of each reference separately and in combination, using the two approaches for reference library selection, and validated the results in an independent cohort (Generation R Study, n = 191) with matched Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting measured cell counts. Strict filtering and combination of the references significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of cell type estimates. Ultimately, the IDOL library outperformed the library from the automatic selection method implemented in pickCompProbes. CONCLUSION: These results have important implications for epigenetic studies in UCB as implementing this method will optimally reduce confounding due to cellular heterogeneity. This work provides guidelines for future reference-based UCB deconvolution and establishes a framework for combining reference datasets in other tissues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6712867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67128672019-09-04 Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data Gervin, Kristina Salas, Lucas A. Bakulski, Kelly M. van Zelm, Menno C. Koestler, Devin C. Wiencke, John K. Duijts, Liesbeth Moll, Henriëtte A. Kelsey, Karl T. Kobor, Michael S. Lyle, Robert Christensen, Brock C. Felix, Janine F. Jones, Meaghan J. Clin Epigenetics Methodology BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is commonly used in epigenome-wide association studies of prenatal exposures. Accounting for cell type composition is critical in such studies as it reduces confounding due to the cell specificity of DNA methylation (DNAm). In the absence of cell sorting information, statistical methods can be applied to deconvolve heterogeneous cell mixtures. Among these methods, reference-based approaches leverage age-appropriate cell-specific DNAm profiles to estimate cellular composition. In UCB, four reference datasets comprising DNAm signatures profiled in purified cell populations have been published using the Illumina 450 K and EPIC arrays. These datasets are biologically and technically different, and currently, there is no consensus on how to best apply them. Here, we systematically evaluate and compare these datasets and provide recommendations for reference-based UCB deconvolution. RESULTS: We first evaluated the four reference datasets to ascertain both the purity of the samples and the potential cell cross-contamination. We filtered samples and combined datasets to obtain a joint UCB reference. We selected deconvolution libraries using two different approaches: automatic selection using the top differentially methylated probes from the function pickCompProbes in minfi and a standardized library selected using the IDOL (Identifying Optimal Libraries) iterative algorithm. We compared the performance of each reference separately and in combination, using the two approaches for reference library selection, and validated the results in an independent cohort (Generation R Study, n = 191) with matched Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting measured cell counts. Strict filtering and combination of the references significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of cell type estimates. Ultimately, the IDOL library outperformed the library from the automatic selection method implemented in pickCompProbes. CONCLUSION: These results have important implications for epigenetic studies in UCB as implementing this method will optimally reduce confounding due to cellular heterogeneity. This work provides guidelines for future reference-based UCB deconvolution and establishes a framework for combining reference datasets in other tissues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6712867/ /pubmed/31455416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Gervin, Kristina Salas, Lucas A. Bakulski, Kelly M. van Zelm, Menno C. Koestler, Devin C. Wiencke, John K. Duijts, Liesbeth Moll, Henriëtte A. Kelsey, Karl T. Kobor, Michael S. Lyle, Robert Christensen, Brock C. Felix, Janine F. Jones, Meaghan J. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title | Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title_full | Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title_fullStr | Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title_short | Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data |
title_sort | systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood dna methylation data |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gervinkristina systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT salaslucasa systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT bakulskikellym systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT vanzelmmennoc systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT koestlerdevinc systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT wienckejohnk systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT duijtsliesbeth systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT mollhenriettea systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT kelseykarlt systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT kobormichaels systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT lylerobert systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT christensenbrockc systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT felixjaninef systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata AT jonesmeaghanj systematicevaluationandvalidationofreferenceandlibraryselectionmethodsfordeconvolutionofcordblooddnamethylationdata |