Cargando…

Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review

Background: Oral biofilms are the root cause of major oral diseases. As in vitro biofilms are not representative of the intraoral milieu, various devices have been manufactured over the years to develop Appliance Grown Oral Biofilm (AGOB). Objective: To review various intraoral appliances used to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdullah, Nizam, Al-Marzooq, Farah, Mohamad, Suharni, Abd Rahman, Normastura, Chi Ngo, Hien, Perera Samaranayake, Lakshman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1647757
_version_ 1783446841582419968
author Abdullah, Nizam
Al-Marzooq, Farah
Mohamad, Suharni
Abd Rahman, Normastura
Chi Ngo, Hien
Perera Samaranayake, Lakshman
author_facet Abdullah, Nizam
Al-Marzooq, Farah
Mohamad, Suharni
Abd Rahman, Normastura
Chi Ngo, Hien
Perera Samaranayake, Lakshman
author_sort Abdullah, Nizam
collection PubMed
description Background: Oral biofilms are the root cause of major oral diseases. As in vitro biofilms are not representative of the intraoral milieu, various devices have been manufactured over the years to develop Appliance Grown Oral Biofilm (AGOB). Objective: To review various intraoral appliances used to develop AGOB for microbiological analysis, and to judge the optimal means for such analyses. Design: Four databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Medline) were searched by two independent reviewers, and articles featuring the key words ‘device’ OR ‘splint’ OR ‘appliance’; ‘Oral biofilm’ OR ‘dental plaque’; ‘in vivo’ OR ‘in situ’; ‘Microbiology’ OR ‘Bacteria’ OR ‘microbiome’; were included. The standard Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were adopted for data gathering. Results: Of the 517 articles which met the initial inclusion criteria, 24 were deemed eligible for review. The age of the AGOB, sampled at various intervals, ranged from 30 min to 28 days. The most commonly used microbiome analytical methods were fluorescence microscopy, total cell count using conventional, and molecular tools including Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms. Conclusions: No uniformly superior method for collecting AGOB could be discerned. NGS platforms are preferable for AGOB analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6713217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67132172019-09-05 Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review Abdullah, Nizam Al-Marzooq, Farah Mohamad, Suharni Abd Rahman, Normastura Chi Ngo, Hien Perera Samaranayake, Lakshman J Oral Microbiol Review Article Background: Oral biofilms are the root cause of major oral diseases. As in vitro biofilms are not representative of the intraoral milieu, various devices have been manufactured over the years to develop Appliance Grown Oral Biofilm (AGOB). Objective: To review various intraoral appliances used to develop AGOB for microbiological analysis, and to judge the optimal means for such analyses. Design: Four databases (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Medline) were searched by two independent reviewers, and articles featuring the key words ‘device’ OR ‘splint’ OR ‘appliance’; ‘Oral biofilm’ OR ‘dental plaque’; ‘in vivo’ OR ‘in situ’; ‘Microbiology’ OR ‘Bacteria’ OR ‘microbiome’; were included. The standard Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were adopted for data gathering. Results: Of the 517 articles which met the initial inclusion criteria, 24 were deemed eligible for review. The age of the AGOB, sampled at various intervals, ranged from 30 min to 28 days. The most commonly used microbiome analytical methods were fluorescence microscopy, total cell count using conventional, and molecular tools including Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms. Conclusions: No uniformly superior method for collecting AGOB could be discerned. NGS platforms are preferable for AGOB analyses. Taylor & Francis 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6713217/ /pubmed/31489127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1647757 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Abdullah, Nizam
Al-Marzooq, Farah
Mohamad, Suharni
Abd Rahman, Normastura
Chi Ngo, Hien
Perera Samaranayake, Lakshman
Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title_full Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title_short Intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
title_sort intraoral appliances for in situ oral biofilm growth: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20002297.2019.1647757
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahnizam intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview
AT almarzooqfarah intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview
AT mohamadsuharni intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview
AT abdrahmannormastura intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview
AT chingohien intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview
AT pererasamaranayakelakshman intraoralappliancesforinsituoralbiofilmgrowthasystematicreview