Cargando…
Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year peri...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454203 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0212 |
_version_ | 1783446865776214016 |
---|---|
author | Loesch, Andrzej Pinheiro, Bruno Botelho Dashwood, Michael Richard |
author_facet | Loesch, Andrzej Pinheiro, Bruno Botelho Dashwood, Michael Richard |
author_sort | Loesch, Andrzej |
collection | PubMed |
description | The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6713382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67133822019-09-03 Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil Loesch, Andrzej Pinheiro, Bruno Botelho Dashwood, Michael Richard Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Special Article The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6713382/ /pubmed/31454203 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0212 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Article Loesch, Andrzej Pinheiro, Bruno Botelho Dashwood, Michael Richard Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title | Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title_full | Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title_fullStr | Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title_short | Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of
Choice for CABG in Brazil |
title_sort | why use the radial artery? the saphenous vein is the second graft of
choice for cabg in brazil |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454203 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loeschandrzej whyusetheradialarterythesaphenousveinisthesecondgraftofchoiceforcabginbrazil AT pinheirobrunobotelho whyusetheradialarterythesaphenousveinisthesecondgraftofchoiceforcabginbrazil AT dashwoodmichaelrichard whyusetheradialarterythesaphenousveinisthesecondgraftofchoiceforcabginbrazil |