Cargando…

Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis

Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jekarl, Dong Wook, Choi, Hyunyu, Kim, Ji Yeon, Lee, Seungok, Gweon, Tae Geun, Lee, Hae Kyung, Kim, Yonggoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68
_version_ 1783446901677359104
author Jekarl, Dong Wook
Choi, Hyunyu
Kim, Ji Yeon
Lee, Seungok
Gweon, Tae Geun
Lee, Hae Kyung
Kim, Yonggoo
author_facet Jekarl, Dong Wook
Choi, Hyunyu
Kim, Ji Yeon
Lee, Seungok
Gweon, Tae Geun
Lee, Hae Kyung
Kim, Yonggoo
author_sort Jekarl, Dong Wook
collection PubMed
description Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection are required. We used LCA to construct a reference standard and evaluate the capability of non-invasive tests (stool antigen test and serum antibody test) to diagnose H. pylori infection compared with the conventional method, where histology is the reference standard. A total of 96 healthy subjects with endoscopy histology results were enrolled from January to July 2016. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the LCA approach (i.e., using a combination of three tests as the reference standard) and the conventional method. When LCA was used, sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.4% for histology, 80.0% and 81.9% for the stool antigen test, and 63.6% and 89.3% for the serum antibody test, respectively. When the conventional method was used, sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 71.1% for the stool antigen test and 77.7% and 60.7% for the serum antibody test, respectively. LCA can be applied to evaluate diagnostic tests that lack a reference standard.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6713662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67136622020-01-01 Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis Jekarl, Dong Wook Choi, Hyunyu Kim, Ji Yeon Lee, Seungok Gweon, Tae Geun Lee, Hae Kyung Kim, Yonggoo Ann Lab Med Brief Communication Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection are required. We used LCA to construct a reference standard and evaluate the capability of non-invasive tests (stool antigen test and serum antibody test) to diagnose H. pylori infection compared with the conventional method, where histology is the reference standard. A total of 96 healthy subjects with endoscopy histology results were enrolled from January to July 2016. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the LCA approach (i.e., using a combination of three tests as the reference standard) and the conventional method. When LCA was used, sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.4% for histology, 80.0% and 81.9% for the stool antigen test, and 63.6% and 89.3% for the serum antibody test, respectively. When the conventional method was used, sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 71.1% for the stool antigen test and 77.7% and 60.7% for the serum antibody test, respectively. LCA can be applied to evaluate diagnostic tests that lack a reference standard. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2020-01 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6713662/ /pubmed/31432642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Jekarl, Dong Wook
Choi, Hyunyu
Kim, Ji Yeon
Lee, Seungok
Gweon, Tae Geun
Lee, Hae Kyung
Kim, Yonggoo
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title_full Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title_short Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
title_sort evaluating diagnostic tests for helicobacter pylori infection without a reference standard: use of latent class analysis
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432642
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68
work_keys_str_mv AT jekarldongwook evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT choihyunyu evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT kimjiyeon evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT leeseungok evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT gweontaegeun evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT leehaekyung evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis
AT kimyonggoo evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis