Cargando…
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis
Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68 |
_version_ | 1783446901677359104 |
---|---|
author | Jekarl, Dong Wook Choi, Hyunyu Kim, Ji Yeon Lee, Seungok Gweon, Tae Geun Lee, Hae Kyung Kim, Yonggoo |
author_facet | Jekarl, Dong Wook Choi, Hyunyu Kim, Ji Yeon Lee, Seungok Gweon, Tae Geun Lee, Hae Kyung Kim, Yonggoo |
author_sort | Jekarl, Dong Wook |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection are required. We used LCA to construct a reference standard and evaluate the capability of non-invasive tests (stool antigen test and serum antibody test) to diagnose H. pylori infection compared with the conventional method, where histology is the reference standard. A total of 96 healthy subjects with endoscopy histology results were enrolled from January to July 2016. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the LCA approach (i.e., using a combination of three tests as the reference standard) and the conventional method. When LCA was used, sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.4% for histology, 80.0% and 81.9% for the stool antigen test, and 63.6% and 89.3% for the serum antibody test, respectively. When the conventional method was used, sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 71.1% for the stool antigen test and 77.7% and 60.7% for the serum antibody test, respectively. LCA can be applied to evaluate diagnostic tests that lack a reference standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6713662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67136622020-01-01 Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis Jekarl, Dong Wook Choi, Hyunyu Kim, Ji Yeon Lee, Seungok Gweon, Tae Geun Lee, Hae Kyung Kim, Yonggoo Ann Lab Med Brief Communication Evaluation of diagnostic tests requires reference standards, which are often unavailable. Latent class analysis (LCA) can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests without reference standards, using a combination of observed and estimated results. Conditionally independent diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection are required. We used LCA to construct a reference standard and evaluate the capability of non-invasive tests (stool antigen test and serum antibody test) to diagnose H. pylori infection compared with the conventional method, where histology is the reference standard. A total of 96 healthy subjects with endoscopy histology results were enrolled from January to July 2016. Sensitivity and specificity were determined for the LCA approach (i.e., using a combination of three tests as the reference standard) and the conventional method. When LCA was used, sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 99.4% for histology, 80.0% and 81.9% for the stool antigen test, and 63.6% and 89.3% for the serum antibody test, respectively. When the conventional method was used, sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 71.1% for the stool antigen test and 77.7% and 60.7% for the serum antibody test, respectively. LCA can be applied to evaluate diagnostic tests that lack a reference standard. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2020-01 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6713662/ /pubmed/31432642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Jekarl, Dong Wook Choi, Hyunyu Kim, Ji Yeon Lee, Seungok Gweon, Tae Geun Lee, Hae Kyung Kim, Yonggoo Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title | Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title_full | Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title_short | Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection Without a Reference Standard: Use of Latent Class Analysis |
title_sort | evaluating diagnostic tests for helicobacter pylori infection without a reference standard: use of latent class analysis |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31432642 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2020.40.1.68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jekarldongwook evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT choihyunyu evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT kimjiyeon evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT leeseungok evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT gweontaegeun evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT leehaekyung evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis AT kimyonggoo evaluatingdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfectionwithoutareferencestandarduseoflatentclassanalysis |