Cargando…
The status of health economic evaluation within decision making in Austria
BACKGROUND: Given limited resources compared to the demand for them, spending resources efficiently is important. Key methods applied for supporting efficient resource allocation are health economic evaluations. METHODS: Based on secondary literature, we analyze international challenges for using tw...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-019-0689-8 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Given limited resources compared to the demand for them, spending resources efficiently is important. Key methods applied for supporting efficient resource allocation are health economic evaluations. METHODS: Based on secondary literature, we analyze international challenges for using two types of economic evaluations—cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis—in reimbursement decisions and reflect on them for the Austrian case. RESULTS: The main challenges with the application of economic evaluations are related to the methods, the decision-making culture, and the respective system. The challenges also apply to the Austrian Bismarck system, where almost no formal requirements for using economic evaluations exist, except on a case-by-case basis. Resource allocation in Austria hence occurs, for the most part, implicitly. CONCLUSION: One way forward towards more explicit efficiency considerations may be to consider more descriptive study types and foster capacity building, standardization of methods and presentation of results, and a mandatory detailed guideline. |
---|