Cargando…

The status of health economic evaluation within decision making in Austria

BACKGROUND: Given limited resources compared to the demand for them, spending resources efficiently is important. Key methods applied for supporting efficient resource allocation are health economic evaluations. METHODS: Based on secondary literature, we analyze international challenges for using tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid, Stanak, Michal, Wolf, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-019-0689-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Given limited resources compared to the demand for them, spending resources efficiently is important. Key methods applied for supporting efficient resource allocation are health economic evaluations. METHODS: Based on secondary literature, we analyze international challenges for using two types of economic evaluations—cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis—in reimbursement decisions and reflect on them for the Austrian case. RESULTS: The main challenges with the application of economic evaluations are related to the methods, the decision-making culture, and the respective system. The challenges also apply to the Austrian Bismarck system, where almost no formal requirements for using economic evaluations exist, except on a case-by-case basis. Resource allocation in Austria hence occurs, for the most part, implicitly. CONCLUSION: One way forward towards more explicit efficiency considerations may be to consider more descriptive study types and foster capacity building, standardization of methods and presentation of results, and a mandatory detailed guideline.