Cargando…
Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004 |
_version_ | 1783446942580211712 |
---|---|
author | Helmers, Richard Doebbeling, Bradley N. Kaufman, David Grando, Adela Poterack, Karl Furniss, Stepahanie Burton, Matthew Miksch, Timothy |
author_facet | Helmers, Richard Doebbeling, Bradley N. Kaufman, David Grando, Adela Poterack, Karl Furniss, Stepahanie Burton, Matthew Miksch, Timothy |
author_sort | Helmers, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significantly affected by EHR implementations and conversions, resulting in provider frustration and reduced efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our institution completed a large EHR conversion and workflow standardization converting from 3 EHRs (GE Centricity and 2 versions of Cerner) to a system-wide Epic platform. To study this quantitatively and qualitatively, we collected and curated clinical workflows through rapid ethnography, workflow observation, video ethnography, and log-file analyses of hundreds of providers, patients, and more than 100,000 log files. The study included 5 geographic sites in 4 states (Arizona, Minnesota, Florida, and Wisconsin). This project began in April 2016, and will be completed by December 2019. Our study began on May 1, 2016, and is ongoing. RESULTS: Salient themes include the importance of prioritizing clinical areas with the most intensive EHR use, the value of tools to identify bottlenecks in workflow that cause delays, and desire for additional training to optimize navigation. Video microanalyses identified marked differences in patterns of workflow and EHR navigation patterns across sites. Log-file analyses and social network analyses identified differences in personnel roles, which led to differences in patient–clinician interaction, time spent using the EHR, and paper-based artifacts. CONCLUSION: Assessing and curating workflow data before and after EHR conversion may provide opportunities for unexpected efficiencies in workflow optimization and information-system redesign. This project may be a model for capturing significant new knowledge in using EHRs to improve patient care, workflow efficiency, and outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6713835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67138352019-09-04 Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation Helmers, Richard Doebbeling, Bradley N. Kaufman, David Grando, Adela Poterack, Karl Furniss, Stepahanie Burton, Matthew Miksch, Timothy Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significantly affected by EHR implementations and conversions, resulting in provider frustration and reduced efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our institution completed a large EHR conversion and workflow standardization converting from 3 EHRs (GE Centricity and 2 versions of Cerner) to a system-wide Epic platform. To study this quantitatively and qualitatively, we collected and curated clinical workflows through rapid ethnography, workflow observation, video ethnography, and log-file analyses of hundreds of providers, patients, and more than 100,000 log files. The study included 5 geographic sites in 4 states (Arizona, Minnesota, Florida, and Wisconsin). This project began in April 2016, and will be completed by December 2019. Our study began on May 1, 2016, and is ongoing. RESULTS: Salient themes include the importance of prioritizing clinical areas with the most intensive EHR use, the value of tools to identify bottlenecks in workflow that cause delays, and desire for additional training to optimize navigation. Video microanalyses identified marked differences in patterns of workflow and EHR navigation patterns across sites. Log-file analyses and social network analyses identified differences in personnel roles, which led to differences in patient–clinician interaction, time spent using the EHR, and paper-based artifacts. CONCLUSION: Assessing and curating workflow data before and after EHR conversion may provide opportunities for unexpected efficiencies in workflow optimization and information-system redesign. This project may be a model for capturing significant new knowledge in using EHRs to improve patient care, workflow efficiency, and outcomes. Elsevier 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6713835/ /pubmed/31485570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004 Text en © 2019 THE AUTHORS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Helmers, Richard Doebbeling, Bradley N. Kaufman, David Grando, Adela Poterack, Karl Furniss, Stepahanie Burton, Matthew Miksch, Timothy Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title | Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title_full | Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title_short | Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation |
title_sort | mayo clinic registry of operational tasks (root): a paradigm shift in electronic health record implementation evaluation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helmersrichard mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT doebbelingbradleyn mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT kaufmandavid mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT grandoadela mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT poterackkarl mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT furnissstepahanie mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT burtonmatthew mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation AT mikschtimothy mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation |