Cargando…

Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmers, Richard, Doebbeling, Bradley N., Kaufman, David, Grando, Adela, Poterack, Karl, Furniss, Stepahanie, Burton, Matthew, Miksch, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004
_version_ 1783446942580211712
author Helmers, Richard
Doebbeling, Bradley N.
Kaufman, David
Grando, Adela
Poterack, Karl
Furniss, Stepahanie
Burton, Matthew
Miksch, Timothy
author_facet Helmers, Richard
Doebbeling, Bradley N.
Kaufman, David
Grando, Adela
Poterack, Karl
Furniss, Stepahanie
Burton, Matthew
Miksch, Timothy
author_sort Helmers, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significantly affected by EHR implementations and conversions, resulting in provider frustration and reduced efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our institution completed a large EHR conversion and workflow standardization converting from 3 EHRs (GE Centricity and 2 versions of Cerner) to a system-wide Epic platform. To study this quantitatively and qualitatively, we collected and curated clinical workflows through rapid ethnography, workflow observation, video ethnography, and log-file analyses of hundreds of providers, patients, and more than 100,000 log files. The study included 5 geographic sites in 4 states (Arizona, Minnesota, Florida, and Wisconsin). This project began in April 2016, and will be completed by December 2019. Our study began on May 1, 2016, and is ongoing. RESULTS: Salient themes include the importance of prioritizing clinical areas with the most intensive EHR use, the value of tools to identify bottlenecks in workflow that cause delays, and desire for additional training to optimize navigation. Video microanalyses identified marked differences in patterns of workflow and EHR navigation patterns across sites. Log-file analyses and social network analyses identified differences in personnel roles, which led to differences in patient–clinician interaction, time spent using the EHR, and paper-based artifacts. CONCLUSION: Assessing and curating workflow data before and after EHR conversion may provide opportunities for unexpected efficiencies in workflow optimization and information-system redesign. This project may be a model for capturing significant new knowledge in using EHRs to improve patient care, workflow efficiency, and outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6713835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67138352019-09-04 Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation Helmers, Richard Doebbeling, Bradley N. Kaufman, David Grando, Adela Poterack, Karl Furniss, Stepahanie Burton, Matthew Miksch, Timothy Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To systematically examine clinical workflows before and after a major electronic health record (EHR) implementation, we performed this study. EHR implementation and/or conversion are associated with many challenges, which are barriers to optimal care. Clinical workflows may be significantly affected by EHR implementations and conversions, resulting in provider frustration and reduced efficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our institution completed a large EHR conversion and workflow standardization converting from 3 EHRs (GE Centricity and 2 versions of Cerner) to a system-wide Epic platform. To study this quantitatively and qualitatively, we collected and curated clinical workflows through rapid ethnography, workflow observation, video ethnography, and log-file analyses of hundreds of providers, patients, and more than 100,000 log files. The study included 5 geographic sites in 4 states (Arizona, Minnesota, Florida, and Wisconsin). This project began in April 2016, and will be completed by December 2019. Our study began on May 1, 2016, and is ongoing. RESULTS: Salient themes include the importance of prioritizing clinical areas with the most intensive EHR use, the value of tools to identify bottlenecks in workflow that cause delays, and desire for additional training to optimize navigation. Video microanalyses identified marked differences in patterns of workflow and EHR navigation patterns across sites. Log-file analyses and social network analyses identified differences in personnel roles, which led to differences in patient–clinician interaction, time spent using the EHR, and paper-based artifacts. CONCLUSION: Assessing and curating workflow data before and after EHR conversion may provide opportunities for unexpected efficiencies in workflow optimization and information-system redesign. This project may be a model for capturing significant new knowledge in using EHRs to improve patient care, workflow efficiency, and outcomes. Elsevier 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6713835/ /pubmed/31485570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004 Text en © 2019 THE AUTHORS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Helmers, Richard
Doebbeling, Bradley N.
Kaufman, David
Grando, Adela
Poterack, Karl
Furniss, Stepahanie
Burton, Matthew
Miksch, Timothy
Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title_full Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title_fullStr Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title_short Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT): A Paradigm Shift in Electronic Health Record Implementation Evaluation
title_sort mayo clinic registry of operational tasks (root): a paradigm shift in electronic health record implementation evaluation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT helmersrichard mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT doebbelingbradleyn mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT kaufmandavid mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT grandoadela mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT poterackkarl mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT furnissstepahanie mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT burtonmatthew mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation
AT mikschtimothy mayoclinicregistryofoperationaltasksrootaparadigmshiftinelectronichealthrecordimplementationevaluation