Cargando…
Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach
This study reports the first assessment of published comments in the family medicine literature using structured codes, which produced commentary annotations that will be the foundation of a knowledge base of appraisals of family medicine trials. Evidence appraisal occurs in a variety of formats and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000264 |
_version_ | 1783446954604232704 |
---|---|
author | Sahin, Alain Nathan Goldstein, Andrew Weng, Chunhua |
author_facet | Sahin, Alain Nathan Goldstein, Andrew Weng, Chunhua |
author_sort | Sahin, Alain Nathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study reports the first assessment of published comments in the family medicine literature using structured codes, which produced commentary annotations that will be the foundation of a knowledge base of appraisals of family medicine trials. Evidence appraisal occurs in a variety of formats and serves to shed light on the quality of research. However, scientific discourse generally and evidence appraisal in particular has not itself been analyzed for insights. A search strategy was devised to identify all journal comments indexed in PubMed linked to controlled intervention studies published in a recent 15-year period in major family medicine journals. A previously developed structured representation in the form of a list of appraisal concepts was used to formally annotate and categorize the journal comments through an iterative process. Trends in family medicine evidence appraisal were then analyzed. A total of 93 comments on studies from five journals over 15 years were included in the analysis. Two thirds of extracted appraisals were negative criticisms. All appraisals of measurement instruments were negative (100%). The participants baseline characteristics, the author discussions, and the design of the interventions were also criticized (respectively 91.7%, 84.6% and 83.3% negative). In contrast, appraisals of the scientific basis of the studies were positive (81.8%). The categories with the most appraisals were, most generally, those focused on the study design, and most specifically, those focused on the scientific basis. This study provides a new data-driven approach to review scientific discourse regarding the strengths and limitations of research within academic family medicine. This methodology can potentially generalize to other medical domains. Structured appraisal data generated here will enable future clinical, scientific, and policy decision-making and broader meta-research in family medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6713885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67138852019-09-06 Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach Sahin, Alain Nathan Goldstein, Andrew Weng, Chunhua Prim Health Care Res Dev Development This study reports the first assessment of published comments in the family medicine literature using structured codes, which produced commentary annotations that will be the foundation of a knowledge base of appraisals of family medicine trials. Evidence appraisal occurs in a variety of formats and serves to shed light on the quality of research. However, scientific discourse generally and evidence appraisal in particular has not itself been analyzed for insights. A search strategy was devised to identify all journal comments indexed in PubMed linked to controlled intervention studies published in a recent 15-year period in major family medicine journals. A previously developed structured representation in the form of a list of appraisal concepts was used to formally annotate and categorize the journal comments through an iterative process. Trends in family medicine evidence appraisal were then analyzed. A total of 93 comments on studies from five journals over 15 years were included in the analysis. Two thirds of extracted appraisals were negative criticisms. All appraisals of measurement instruments were negative (100%). The participants baseline characteristics, the author discussions, and the design of the interventions were also criticized (respectively 91.7%, 84.6% and 83.3% negative). In contrast, appraisals of the scientific basis of the studies were positive (81.8%). The categories with the most appraisals were, most generally, those focused on the study design, and most specifically, those focused on the scientific basis. This study provides a new data-driven approach to review scientific discourse regarding the strengths and limitations of research within academic family medicine. This methodology can potentially generalize to other medical domains. Structured appraisal data generated here will enable future clinical, scientific, and policy decision-making and broader meta-research in family medicine. Cambridge University Press 2019-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6713885/ /pubmed/31434596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000264 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Development Sahin, Alain Nathan Goldstein, Andrew Weng, Chunhua Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title | Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title_full | Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title_fullStr | Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title_short | Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
title_sort | analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach |
topic | Development |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31434596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahinalainnathan analysisofevidenceappraisalsforinterventionalstudiesinfamilymedicineusinganinformaticsapproach AT goldsteinandrew analysisofevidenceappraisalsforinterventionalstudiesinfamilymedicineusinganinformaticsapproach AT wengchunhua analysisofevidenceappraisalsforinterventionalstudiesinfamilymedicineusinganinformaticsapproach |