Cargando…
A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques
Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic technique for the detection of prostate cancer. Patient selection for prostate biopsy is complex and is influenced by emerging use of prebiopsy imaging. The introduction of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prost...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219870074 |
_version_ | 1783446969542246400 |
---|---|
author | Streicher, Justin Meyerson, Brian Lee Karivedu, Vidhya Sidana, Abhinav |
author_facet | Streicher, Justin Meyerson, Brian Lee Karivedu, Vidhya Sidana, Abhinav |
author_sort | Streicher, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic technique for the detection of prostate cancer. Patient selection for prostate biopsy is complex and is influenced by emerging use of prebiopsy imaging. The introduction of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy has clear advantages over the historical standard of care. There are several biopsy techniques currently utilized with unique advantages and disadvantages. We review and summarize the current body of literature pertaining to when and how a prostate biopsy should be performed. We discuss current recommendations regarding patient selection for biopsy and discuss future directions regarding prebiopsy imaging. We offer a description of the MRI–TRUS fusion biopsy technique and a comparison of many of the currently available fusion software platforms. Articles pertaining to the title were obtained via PubMed index search with relevant keywords supplemented with personal collection of related publications. Prostate biopsy should be considered for patients with gross digital rectal exam (DRE) abnormality, patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 4 ng/ml, and concomitant risk factors for prostate cancer or patients with lesions identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 2 (PI-RADS2) score of 4 or 5. MRI–TRUS fusion biopsy has demonstrated advantages in cancer detection when compared with TRUS-guided biopsy. There are currently several fusion software platforms available with a variety of biopsy approaches. Future efforts should detail the role of prebiopsy imaging as a triage tool for prostate biopsy. Consensus should be sought regarding the preferred modality of fusion biopsy. Additional data describing each fusion software platform would enable a more rigorous comparison of platform sensitivities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6713958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67139582019-09-05 A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques Streicher, Justin Meyerson, Brian Lee Karivedu, Vidhya Sidana, Abhinav Ther Adv Urol Review Prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic technique for the detection of prostate cancer. Patient selection for prostate biopsy is complex and is influenced by emerging use of prebiopsy imaging. The introduction of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy has clear advantages over the historical standard of care. There are several biopsy techniques currently utilized with unique advantages and disadvantages. We review and summarize the current body of literature pertaining to when and how a prostate biopsy should be performed. We discuss current recommendations regarding patient selection for biopsy and discuss future directions regarding prebiopsy imaging. We offer a description of the MRI–TRUS fusion biopsy technique and a comparison of many of the currently available fusion software platforms. Articles pertaining to the title were obtained via PubMed index search with relevant keywords supplemented with personal collection of related publications. Prostate biopsy should be considered for patients with gross digital rectal exam (DRE) abnormality, patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 4 ng/ml, and concomitant risk factors for prostate cancer or patients with lesions identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 2 (PI-RADS2) score of 4 or 5. MRI–TRUS fusion biopsy has demonstrated advantages in cancer detection when compared with TRUS-guided biopsy. There are currently several fusion software platforms available with a variety of biopsy approaches. Future efforts should detail the role of prebiopsy imaging as a triage tool for prostate biopsy. Consensus should be sought regarding the preferred modality of fusion biopsy. Additional data describing each fusion software platform would enable a more rigorous comparison of platform sensitivities. SAGE Publications 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6713958/ /pubmed/31489033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219870074 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Streicher, Justin Meyerson, Brian Lee Karivedu, Vidhya Sidana, Abhinav A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title | A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title_full | A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title_fullStr | A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title_short | A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
title_sort | review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6713958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219870074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT streicherjustin areviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT meyersonbrianlee areviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT kariveduvidhya areviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT sidanaabhinav areviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT streicherjustin reviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT meyersonbrianlee reviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT kariveduvidhya reviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques AT sidanaabhinav reviewofoptimalprostatebiopsyindicationsandtechniques |