Cargando…

Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt

In the present study, we investigated the radiation doses received by the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) staff in three different diagnostic centers in Egypt. The whole-body effective dose measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for staff working in PET and the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad, Zamzam, Abdulrahman M.M., Yassin, Hossam Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516373
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_42_18
_version_ 1783447002458095616
author Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad
Zamzam, Abdulrahman M.M.
Yassin, Hossam Mahmoud
author_facet Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad
Zamzam, Abdulrahman M.M.
Yassin, Hossam Mahmoud
author_sort Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad
collection PubMed
description In the present study, we investigated the radiation doses received by the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) staff in three different diagnostic centers in Egypt. The whole-body effective dose measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for staff working in PET and the effective dose per study received by physicist, technician, and nurse were measured by an electronic pocket dosimeter (EPD) during a period of 6 months. Statistical analysis was held between the measurements of the TLDs as well as for the EPD for the three studied PET-CT centers. After combining TLD and EPD prospective annual scores for the three studied categories in the three centers, the one-way ANOVA test results have shown that there were statistically significant differences between group means with respect to their TLD mean score (P = 0.041). The mean nurse group TLD score, across the three centers, appeared to be the lowest scoring 3.83 (standard deviation [SD] 0.012) compared to the physicist and technician who measured 4.62 (SD 0.231) and 6.92 (SD 0.018), respectively. Scheffe's test for complex comparisons revealed a significant difference between nurse group and technologist group (P = 0.001). Regarding the annual combined EPD scores, the post hoc test, namely Scheffe's test for complex comparisons, revealed a significant difference between nurse group and technologist group (P = 0.001). This was measured after the one-way ANOVA test results have shown that there were statistically significant differences between annual group EPD means (P = 0.032). Finally, there was no recorded significance for the studied categories across the three centers between their annual TLD and EPD dose scores (P = 0.072). Technicians group received the highest mean effective whole-body doses when compared with the International Commission on Radiological Protection dose limit, each individual worker can work with many more 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT studies for a (period time) without exceeding the occupational dose limits if the average received effective dose continues with the same rate. The study also confirmed that low levels of radiation dose are received by medical personnel involved in 18F-FDG PET/CT procedures in those centers due to implementing radiation protection measures and procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67141562019-09-12 Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad Zamzam, Abdulrahman M.M. Yassin, Hossam Mahmoud World J Nucl Med Original Article In the present study, we investigated the radiation doses received by the positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) staff in three different diagnostic centers in Egypt. The whole-body effective dose measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for staff working in PET and the effective dose per study received by physicist, technician, and nurse were measured by an electronic pocket dosimeter (EPD) during a period of 6 months. Statistical analysis was held between the measurements of the TLDs as well as for the EPD for the three studied PET-CT centers. After combining TLD and EPD prospective annual scores for the three studied categories in the three centers, the one-way ANOVA test results have shown that there were statistically significant differences between group means with respect to their TLD mean score (P = 0.041). The mean nurse group TLD score, across the three centers, appeared to be the lowest scoring 3.83 (standard deviation [SD] 0.012) compared to the physicist and technician who measured 4.62 (SD 0.231) and 6.92 (SD 0.018), respectively. Scheffe's test for complex comparisons revealed a significant difference between nurse group and technologist group (P = 0.001). Regarding the annual combined EPD scores, the post hoc test, namely Scheffe's test for complex comparisons, revealed a significant difference between nurse group and technologist group (P = 0.001). This was measured after the one-way ANOVA test results have shown that there were statistically significant differences between annual group EPD means (P = 0.032). Finally, there was no recorded significance for the studied categories across the three centers between their annual TLD and EPD dose scores (P = 0.072). Technicians group received the highest mean effective whole-body doses when compared with the International Commission on Radiological Protection dose limit, each individual worker can work with many more 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT studies for a (period time) without exceeding the occupational dose limits if the average received effective dose continues with the same rate. The study also confirmed that low levels of radiation dose are received by medical personnel involved in 18F-FDG PET/CT procedures in those centers due to implementing radiation protection measures and procedures. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6714156/ /pubmed/31516373 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_42_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmed, Ibrahim Elsayed Saad
Zamzam, Abdulrahman M.M.
Yassin, Hossam Mahmoud
Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title_full Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title_fullStr Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title_short Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in Egypt
title_sort statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography–computed tomography centers in egypt
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31516373
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_42_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedibrahimelsayedsaad statisticalanalysisoftheoccupationalradiationdosesinthreedifferentpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographycentersinegypt
AT zamzamabdulrahmanmm statisticalanalysisoftheoccupationalradiationdosesinthreedifferentpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographycentersinegypt
AT yassinhossammahmoud statisticalanalysisoftheoccupationalradiationdosesinthreedifferentpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographycentersinegypt