Cargando…

Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression

BACKGROUND: Recently, more consideration is being given to the beneficial effects of lighting on the maintenance and promotion of the health and well-being of office occupants in built environments. A new lighting technology using Rayleigh scattering has made it possible to simulate a blue sky. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasukouchi, Akira, Maeda, Takafumi, Hara, Kazuyoshi, Furuune, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0203-4
_version_ 1783447047861436416
author Yasukouchi, Akira
Maeda, Takafumi
Hara, Kazuyoshi
Furuune, Hiroyuki
author_facet Yasukouchi, Akira
Maeda, Takafumi
Hara, Kazuyoshi
Furuune, Hiroyuki
author_sort Yasukouchi, Akira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, more consideration is being given to the beneficial effects of lighting on the maintenance and promotion of the health and well-being of office occupants in built environments. A new lighting technology using Rayleigh scattering has made it possible to simulate a blue sky. However, to date, no studies have examined the possible beneficial effects of such artificial skylights. The aims of this study were to examine the non-visual effects of artificial skylights and conventional fluorescent lights in a simulated office environment and to clarify the feature effects of the artificial skylights. METHODS: Participants were 10 healthy male adults. Non-visual effects were evaluated based on brain arousal levels (α-wave ratio and contingent negative variation [CNV]), autonomic nervous activity (heart rate variability [HRV]), work performance, and subjective responses during daytime exposure to either an artificial skylight or fluorescent lights, as well as nocturnal melatonin secretion. RESULTS: Subjective evaluations of both room lighting-related “natural” and “attractive” items and the “connected to nature” item were significantly higher with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights. Cortical arousal levels obtained from the early component of the CNV amplitude were significantly lower with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights, whereas α-wave ratio and work performance were similar between the two light sources. The HRV evaluation showed that sympathetic nerve tone was lower and parasympathetic nerve tone was higher, both significantly, for the skylight than for the fluorescent lights during daytime. Nocturnal melatonin secretion was significantly greater before and during light exposure at night under the daytime skylight than under the fluorescent lights. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that artificial skylights have some advantages over conventional fluorescent lights in maintaining ordinary work performance during daytime with less psychological and physiological stress. The findings also suggest that the artificial skylights would enable built environments to maintain long-term comfort and productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67143492019-09-04 Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression Yasukouchi, Akira Maeda, Takafumi Hara, Kazuyoshi Furuune, Hiroyuki J Physiol Anthropol Original Article BACKGROUND: Recently, more consideration is being given to the beneficial effects of lighting on the maintenance and promotion of the health and well-being of office occupants in built environments. A new lighting technology using Rayleigh scattering has made it possible to simulate a blue sky. However, to date, no studies have examined the possible beneficial effects of such artificial skylights. The aims of this study were to examine the non-visual effects of artificial skylights and conventional fluorescent lights in a simulated office environment and to clarify the feature effects of the artificial skylights. METHODS: Participants were 10 healthy male adults. Non-visual effects were evaluated based on brain arousal levels (α-wave ratio and contingent negative variation [CNV]), autonomic nervous activity (heart rate variability [HRV]), work performance, and subjective responses during daytime exposure to either an artificial skylight or fluorescent lights, as well as nocturnal melatonin secretion. RESULTS: Subjective evaluations of both room lighting-related “natural” and “attractive” items and the “connected to nature” item were significantly higher with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights. Cortical arousal levels obtained from the early component of the CNV amplitude were significantly lower with the skylight than with the fluorescent lights, whereas α-wave ratio and work performance were similar between the two light sources. The HRV evaluation showed that sympathetic nerve tone was lower and parasympathetic nerve tone was higher, both significantly, for the skylight than for the fluorescent lights during daytime. Nocturnal melatonin secretion was significantly greater before and during light exposure at night under the daytime skylight than under the fluorescent lights. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that artificial skylights have some advantages over conventional fluorescent lights in maintaining ordinary work performance during daytime with less psychological and physiological stress. The findings also suggest that the artificial skylights would enable built environments to maintain long-term comfort and productivity. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714349/ /pubmed/31462321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0203-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yasukouchi, Akira
Maeda, Takafumi
Hara, Kazuyoshi
Furuune, Hiroyuki
Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title_full Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title_fullStr Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title_full_unstemmed Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title_short Non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
title_sort non-visual effects of diurnal exposure to an artificial skylight, including nocturnal melatonin suppression
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40101-019-0203-4
work_keys_str_mv AT yasukouchiakira nonvisualeffectsofdiurnalexposuretoanartificialskylightincludingnocturnalmelatoninsuppression
AT maedatakafumi nonvisualeffectsofdiurnalexposuretoanartificialskylightincludingnocturnalmelatoninsuppression
AT harakazuyoshi nonvisualeffectsofdiurnalexposuretoanartificialskylightincludingnocturnalmelatoninsuppression
AT furuunehiroyuki nonvisualeffectsofdiurnalexposuretoanartificialskylightincludingnocturnalmelatoninsuppression