Cargando…

Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review

BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are major determinants of mental wellbeing, especially among older adults. The effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults has been questioned due to the lack of transparency in identifying and recruiting po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ige, Janet, Gibbons, Lynn, Bray, Issy, Gray, Selena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6
_version_ 1783447061175205888
author Ige, Janet
Gibbons, Lynn
Bray, Issy
Gray, Selena
author_facet Ige, Janet
Gibbons, Lynn
Bray, Issy
Gray, Selena
author_sort Ige, Janet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are major determinants of mental wellbeing, especially among older adults. The effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults has been questioned due to the lack of transparency in identifying and recruiting populations at risk. This paper aims to systematically review methods used to identify and recruit older people at risk of loneliness and social isolation into research studies that seek to address loneliness and social isolation. METHODS: In total, 751 studies were identified from a structured search of eleven electronic databases combined with hand searching of reference bibliography from identified studies for grey literature. Studies conducted between January 1995 and December 2017 were eligible provided they recruited community living individuals aged 50 and above at risk of social isolation or loneliness into an intervention study. RESULT: A total of 22 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Findings from these studies showed that the most common strategy for inviting people to participate in intervention studies were public-facing methods including mass media and local newspaper advertisements. The majority of participants identified this way were self-referred, and in many cases self-identified as lonely. In most cases, there was no standardised tool for defining loneliness or social isolation. However, studies that recruited via referral by recognised agencies reported higher rates of eligibility and enrolment. Referrals from primary care were only used in a few studies. Studies that included agency referral either alone or in combination with multiple forms of recruitment showed more promising recruitment rates than those that relied on only public facing methods. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of multiple forms of referral. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate the need for transparency in writing up the methods used to approach, assess and enrol older adults at risk of becoming socially isolated. None of the intervention studies included in this review justified their recruitment strategies. The ability of researchers to share best practice relies greatly on the transparency of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67144042019-09-04 Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review Ige, Janet Gibbons, Lynn Bray, Issy Gray, Selena BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are major determinants of mental wellbeing, especially among older adults. The effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults has been questioned due to the lack of transparency in identifying and recruiting populations at risk. This paper aims to systematically review methods used to identify and recruit older people at risk of loneliness and social isolation into research studies that seek to address loneliness and social isolation. METHODS: In total, 751 studies were identified from a structured search of eleven electronic databases combined with hand searching of reference bibliography from identified studies for grey literature. Studies conducted between January 1995 and December 2017 were eligible provided they recruited community living individuals aged 50 and above at risk of social isolation or loneliness into an intervention study. RESULT: A total of 22 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Findings from these studies showed that the most common strategy for inviting people to participate in intervention studies were public-facing methods including mass media and local newspaper advertisements. The majority of participants identified this way were self-referred, and in many cases self-identified as lonely. In most cases, there was no standardised tool for defining loneliness or social isolation. However, studies that recruited via referral by recognised agencies reported higher rates of eligibility and enrolment. Referrals from primary care were only used in a few studies. Studies that included agency referral either alone or in combination with multiple forms of recruitment showed more promising recruitment rates than those that relied on only public facing methods. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of multiple forms of referral. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate the need for transparency in writing up the methods used to approach, assess and enrol older adults at risk of becoming socially isolated. None of the intervention studies included in this review justified their recruitment strategies. The ability of researchers to share best practice relies greatly on the transparency of research. BioMed Central 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6714404/ /pubmed/31464586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ige, Janet
Gibbons, Lynn
Bray, Issy
Gray, Selena
Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title_full Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title_fullStr Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title_full_unstemmed Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title_short Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
title_sort methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6
work_keys_str_mv AT igejanet methodsofidentifyingandrecruitingolderpeopleatriskofsocialisolationandlonelinessamixedmethodsreview
AT gibbonslynn methodsofidentifyingandrecruitingolderpeopleatriskofsocialisolationandlonelinessamixedmethodsreview
AT brayissy methodsofidentifyingandrecruitingolderpeopleatriskofsocialisolationandlonelinessamixedmethodsreview
AT grayselena methodsofidentifyingandrecruitingolderpeopleatriskofsocialisolationandlonelinessamixedmethodsreview