Cargando…
The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention
BACKGROUND: An adolescent’s perceptions of their family’s and friends’ smoking attitudes and behaviour can influence their own uptake of smoking. There are two broad sources of such social influence: observing the behaviour directly, and assimilating attitudes. METHODS: We analysed data collected fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7 |
_version_ | 1783447061397504000 |
---|---|
author | Badham, Jennifer McAneney, Helen Dunne, Laura Kee, Frank Thurston, Allen Hunter, Ruth F |
author_facet | Badham, Jennifer McAneney, Helen Dunne, Laura Kee, Frank Thurston, Allen Hunter, Ruth F |
author_sort | Badham, Jennifer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An adolescent’s perceptions of their family’s and friends’ smoking attitudes and behaviour can influence their own uptake of smoking. There are two broad sources of such social influence: observing the behaviour directly, and assimilating attitudes. METHODS: We analysed data collected for the evaluation of Dead Cool, a school based smoking prevention intervention in Northern Ireland (n=480 in 20 clusters). The main analysis fits three nested logistic regression models predicting pre-intervention susceptibility to taking up smoking, as reflected in responses to three attitudinal questions. Model 1 includes only personal characteristics as explanatory factors. Model 2 adds the behaviour of friends and family that would provide an opportunity for social influence through observational learning. Model 3 adds the susceptibility of friends. RESULTS: Each additional group of variables improved the model fit (with reduced AIC and BIC). However, in the final model, only three variables were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) in predicting susceptibility to smoking initiation: rebelliousness (OR [1.1,1.3]) from the personal characteristics group; and, in the observational learning group, being friends with a smoker (OR [1.0,2.9]) and frequency of being in the same room or car with someone smoking (OR [2.0,9.0] for most frequent). Adding the two measures of diffusion of susceptibility through the friendship network improved the model fit, but neither was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provides additional evidence to support policies that could reduce children’s exposure to smoking behaviour, and potential subsequent smoking initiation. No conclusions could be drawn about the diffusion of smoking attitudes through the school friendship networks of children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6714405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67144052019-09-04 The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention Badham, Jennifer McAneney, Helen Dunne, Laura Kee, Frank Thurston, Allen Hunter, Ruth F BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: An adolescent’s perceptions of their family’s and friends’ smoking attitudes and behaviour can influence their own uptake of smoking. There are two broad sources of such social influence: observing the behaviour directly, and assimilating attitudes. METHODS: We analysed data collected for the evaluation of Dead Cool, a school based smoking prevention intervention in Northern Ireland (n=480 in 20 clusters). The main analysis fits three nested logistic regression models predicting pre-intervention susceptibility to taking up smoking, as reflected in responses to three attitudinal questions. Model 1 includes only personal characteristics as explanatory factors. Model 2 adds the behaviour of friends and family that would provide an opportunity for social influence through observational learning. Model 3 adds the susceptibility of friends. RESULTS: Each additional group of variables improved the model fit (with reduced AIC and BIC). However, in the final model, only three variables were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05) in predicting susceptibility to smoking initiation: rebelliousness (OR [1.1,1.3]) from the personal characteristics group; and, in the observational learning group, being friends with a smoker (OR [1.0,2.9]) and frequency of being in the same room or car with someone smoking (OR [2.0,9.0] for most frequent). Adding the two measures of diffusion of susceptibility through the friendship network improved the model fit, but neither was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provides additional evidence to support policies that could reduce children’s exposure to smoking behaviour, and potential subsequent smoking initiation. No conclusions could be drawn about the diffusion of smoking attitudes through the school friendship networks of children. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714405/ /pubmed/31462249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Badham, Jennifer McAneney, Helen Dunne, Laura Kee, Frank Thurston, Allen Hunter, Ruth F The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title | The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title_full | The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title_fullStr | The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title_short | The importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the Dead Cool intervention |
title_sort | importance of social environment in preventing smoking: an analysis of the dead cool intervention |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7485-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badhamjennifer theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT mcaneneyhelen theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT dunnelaura theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT keefrank theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT thurstonallen theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT hunterruthf theimportanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT badhamjennifer importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT mcaneneyhelen importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT dunnelaura importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT keefrank importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT thurstonallen importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention AT hunterruthf importanceofsocialenvironmentinpreventingsmokingananalysisofthedeadcoolintervention |