Cargando…
The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5 |
_version_ | 1783447066980122624 |
---|---|
author | Ørts, Lene Maria Løkke, Anders Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Norman, Kasper Bech, Bodil Hammer Sandbæk, Annelli |
author_facet | Ørts, Lene Maria Løkke, Anders Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Norman, Kasper Bech, Bodil Hammer Sandbæk, Annelli |
author_sort | Ørts, Lene Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study investigates if focused information on spirometry can increase the participation rate in a general health check. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, household cluster-randomised trial with a two-group parallel design including 4407 citizens aged 30–49 years in Denmark and an average cluster size of 1.55 citizens per household. The control group (n = 2213) received a standard invitation describing the content of the general health check and containing practical information. The intervention group (n = 2194) received an extended invitation highlighting the benefits of early detection and prevention of lung disease. The primary outcome was difference in participation rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the proportion of participants at risk of lung disease in both groups. Risk profile was defined as current smoking or self-reported lung symptoms. The inclusion period was 25 November 2015–3 February 2017. RESULTS: No major difference in participation rate was seen between the intervention group (53.4%) and the control group (52.0%). Participants had statistically significantly higher education level compared to non-participants. A total of 24.2% of the participants were at risk of developing lung disease, but no difference was found between the intervention group and the control group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no effect on participation rate of including focused spirometry information in the health check invitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02615769. Registered on 25 November 2015. The trial protocol has been published. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6714428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67144282019-09-04 The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark Ørts, Lene Maria Løkke, Anders Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Norman, Kasper Bech, Bodil Hammer Sandbæk, Annelli BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study investigates if focused information on spirometry can increase the participation rate in a general health check. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, household cluster-randomised trial with a two-group parallel design including 4407 citizens aged 30–49 years in Denmark and an average cluster size of 1.55 citizens per household. The control group (n = 2213) received a standard invitation describing the content of the general health check and containing practical information. The intervention group (n = 2194) received an extended invitation highlighting the benefits of early detection and prevention of lung disease. The primary outcome was difference in participation rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the proportion of participants at risk of lung disease in both groups. Risk profile was defined as current smoking or self-reported lung symptoms. The inclusion period was 25 November 2015–3 February 2017. RESULTS: No major difference in participation rate was seen between the intervention group (53.4%) and the control group (52.0%). Participants had statistically significantly higher education level compared to non-participants. A total of 24.2% of the participants were at risk of developing lung disease, but no difference was found between the intervention group and the control group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no effect on participation rate of including focused spirometry information in the health check invitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02615769. Registered on 25 November 2015. The trial protocol has been published. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714428/ /pubmed/31462261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ørts, Lene Maria Løkke, Anders Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Norman, Kasper Bech, Bodil Hammer Sandbæk, Annelli The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title | The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title_full | The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title_fullStr | The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title_short | The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark |
title_sort | effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in denmark |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ørtslenemaria theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT løkkeanders theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT bjerregaardannelouise theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT maindalhelleterkildsen theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT normankasper theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT bechbodilhammer theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT sandbækannelli theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT ørtslenemaria effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT løkkeanders effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT bjerregaardannelouise effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT maindalhelleterkildsen effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT normankasper effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT bechbodilhammer effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark AT sandbækannelli effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark |