Cargando…

The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark

BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ørts, Lene Maria, Løkke, Anders, Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise, Maindal, Helle Terkildsen, Norman, Kasper, Bech, Bodil Hammer, Sandbæk, Annelli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5
_version_ 1783447066980122624
author Ørts, Lene Maria
Løkke, Anders
Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Norman, Kasper
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Sandbæk, Annelli
author_facet Ørts, Lene Maria
Løkke, Anders
Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Norman, Kasper
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Sandbæk, Annelli
author_sort Ørts, Lene Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study investigates if focused information on spirometry can increase the participation rate in a general health check. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, household cluster-randomised trial with a two-group parallel design including 4407 citizens aged 30–49 years in Denmark and an average cluster size of 1.55 citizens per household. The control group (n = 2213) received a standard invitation describing the content of the general health check and containing practical information. The intervention group (n = 2194) received an extended invitation highlighting the benefits of early detection and prevention of lung disease. The primary outcome was difference in participation rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the proportion of participants at risk of lung disease in both groups. Risk profile was defined as current smoking or self-reported lung symptoms. The inclusion period was 25 November 2015–3 February 2017. RESULTS: No major difference in participation rate was seen between the intervention group (53.4%) and the control group (52.0%). Participants had statistically significantly higher education level compared to non-participants. A total of 24.2% of the participants were at risk of developing lung disease, but no difference was found between the intervention group and the control group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no effect on participation rate of including focused spirometry information in the health check invitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02615769. Registered on 25 November 2015. The trial protocol has been published. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67144282019-09-04 The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark Ørts, Lene Maria Løkke, Anders Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Norman, Kasper Bech, Bodil Hammer Sandbæk, Annelli BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Early detection of lung disease may help reduce disease development. Detection through preventive health checks may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the knowledge is sparse on how to enhance the participation rate in health checks among citizens at risk of developing lung disease. This study investigates if focused information on spirometry can increase the participation rate in a general health check. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, household cluster-randomised trial with a two-group parallel design including 4407 citizens aged 30–49 years in Denmark and an average cluster size of 1.55 citizens per household. The control group (n = 2213) received a standard invitation describing the content of the general health check and containing practical information. The intervention group (n = 2194) received an extended invitation highlighting the benefits of early detection and prevention of lung disease. The primary outcome was difference in participation rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the proportion of participants at risk of lung disease in both groups. Risk profile was defined as current smoking or self-reported lung symptoms. The inclusion period was 25 November 2015–3 February 2017. RESULTS: No major difference in participation rate was seen between the intervention group (53.4%) and the control group (52.0%). Participants had statistically significantly higher education level compared to non-participants. A total of 24.2% of the participants were at risk of developing lung disease, but no difference was found between the intervention group and the control group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed no effect on participation rate of including focused spirometry information in the health check invitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02615769. Registered on 25 November 2015. The trial protocol has been published. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714428/ /pubmed/31462261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ørts, Lene Maria
Løkke, Anders
Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise
Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
Norman, Kasper
Bech, Bodil Hammer
Sandbæk, Annelli
The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title_full The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title_fullStr The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title_short The effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in Denmark
title_sort effect on participation rates of including focused spirometry information in a health check invitation: a cluster-randomised trial in denmark
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7531-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ørtslenemaria theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT løkkeanders theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT bjerregaardannelouise theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT maindalhelleterkildsen theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT normankasper theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT bechbodilhammer theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT sandbækannelli theeffectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT ørtslenemaria effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT løkkeanders effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT bjerregaardannelouise effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT maindalhelleterkildsen effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT normankasper effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT bechbodilhammer effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark
AT sandbækannelli effectonparticipationratesofincludingfocusedspirometryinformationinahealthcheckinvitationaclusterrandomisedtrialindenmark