Cargando…
Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2 |
_version_ | 1783447074444935168 |
---|---|
author | Richters, Megan M. Xia, Huiming Campbell, Katie M. Gillanders, William E. Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi |
author_facet | Richters, Megan M. Xia, Huiming Campbell, Katie M. Gillanders, William E. Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi |
author_sort | Richters, Megan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for cancer treatment. To create a personalized cancer vaccine, neoantigens must be computationally predicted from matched tumor–normal sequencing data, and then ranked according to their predicted capability in stimulating a T cell response. This candidate neoantigen prediction process involves multiple steps, including somatic mutation identification, HLA typing, peptide processing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction. The general workflow has been utilized for many preclinical and clinical trials, but there is no current consensus approach and few established best practices. In this article, we review recent discoveries, summarize the available computational tools, and provide analysis considerations for each step, including neoantigen prediction, prioritization, delivery, and validation methods. In addition to reviewing the current state of neoantigen analysis, we provide practical guidance, specific recommendations, and extensive discussion of critical concepts and points of confusion in the practice of neoantigen characterization for clinical use. Finally, we outline necessary areas of development, including the need to improve HLA class II typing accuracy, to expand software support for diverse neoantigen sources, and to incorporate clinical response data to improve neoantigen prediction algorithms. The ultimate goal of neoantigen characterization workflows is to create personalized vaccines that improve patient outcomes in diverse cancer types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6714459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67144592019-09-04 Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility Richters, Megan M. Xia, Huiming Campbell, Katie M. Gillanders, William E. Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Genome Med Review Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for cancer treatment. To create a personalized cancer vaccine, neoantigens must be computationally predicted from matched tumor–normal sequencing data, and then ranked according to their predicted capability in stimulating a T cell response. This candidate neoantigen prediction process involves multiple steps, including somatic mutation identification, HLA typing, peptide processing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction. The general workflow has been utilized for many preclinical and clinical trials, but there is no current consensus approach and few established best practices. In this article, we review recent discoveries, summarize the available computational tools, and provide analysis considerations for each step, including neoantigen prediction, prioritization, delivery, and validation methods. In addition to reviewing the current state of neoantigen analysis, we provide practical guidance, specific recommendations, and extensive discussion of critical concepts and points of confusion in the practice of neoantigen characterization for clinical use. Finally, we outline necessary areas of development, including the need to improve HLA class II typing accuracy, to expand software support for diverse neoantigen sources, and to incorporate clinical response data to improve neoantigen prediction algorithms. The ultimate goal of neoantigen characterization workflows is to create personalized vaccines that improve patient outcomes in diverse cancer types. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714459/ /pubmed/31462330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Richters, Megan M. Xia, Huiming Campbell, Katie M. Gillanders, William E. Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title | Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title_full | Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title_fullStr | Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title_full_unstemmed | Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title_short | Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
title_sort | best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richtersmeganm bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility AT xiahuiming bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility AT campbellkatiem bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility AT gillanderswilliame bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility AT griffithobil bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility AT griffithmalachi bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility |