Cargando…

Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility

Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richters, Megan M., Xia, Huiming, Campbell, Katie M., Gillanders, William E., Griffith, Obi L., Griffith, Malachi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2
_version_ 1783447074444935168
author Richters, Megan M.
Xia, Huiming
Campbell, Katie M.
Gillanders, William E.
Griffith, Obi L.
Griffith, Malachi
author_facet Richters, Megan M.
Xia, Huiming
Campbell, Katie M.
Gillanders, William E.
Griffith, Obi L.
Griffith, Malachi
author_sort Richters, Megan M.
collection PubMed
description Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for cancer treatment. To create a personalized cancer vaccine, neoantigens must be computationally predicted from matched tumor–normal sequencing data, and then ranked according to their predicted capability in stimulating a T cell response. This candidate neoantigen prediction process involves multiple steps, including somatic mutation identification, HLA typing, peptide processing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction. The general workflow has been utilized for many preclinical and clinical trials, but there is no current consensus approach and few established best practices. In this article, we review recent discoveries, summarize the available computational tools, and provide analysis considerations for each step, including neoantigen prediction, prioritization, delivery, and validation methods. In addition to reviewing the current state of neoantigen analysis, we provide practical guidance, specific recommendations, and extensive discussion of critical concepts and points of confusion in the practice of neoantigen characterization for clinical use. Finally, we outline necessary areas of development, including the need to improve HLA class II typing accuracy, to expand software support for diverse neoantigen sources, and to incorporate clinical response data to improve neoantigen prediction algorithms. The ultimate goal of neoantigen characterization workflows is to create personalized vaccines that improve patient outcomes in diverse cancer types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67144592019-09-04 Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility Richters, Megan M. Xia, Huiming Campbell, Katie M. Gillanders, William E. Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Malachi Genome Med Review Neoantigens are newly formed peptides created from somatic mutations that are capable of inducing tumor-specific T cell recognition. Recently, researchers and clinicians have leveraged next generation sequencing technologies to identify neoantigens and to create personalized immunotherapies for cancer treatment. To create a personalized cancer vaccine, neoantigens must be computationally predicted from matched tumor–normal sequencing data, and then ranked according to their predicted capability in stimulating a T cell response. This candidate neoantigen prediction process involves multiple steps, including somatic mutation identification, HLA typing, peptide processing, and peptide-MHC binding prediction. The general workflow has been utilized for many preclinical and clinical trials, but there is no current consensus approach and few established best practices. In this article, we review recent discoveries, summarize the available computational tools, and provide analysis considerations for each step, including neoantigen prediction, prioritization, delivery, and validation methods. In addition to reviewing the current state of neoantigen analysis, we provide practical guidance, specific recommendations, and extensive discussion of critical concepts and points of confusion in the practice of neoantigen characterization for clinical use. Finally, we outline necessary areas of development, including the need to improve HLA class II typing accuracy, to expand software support for diverse neoantigen sources, and to incorporate clinical response data to improve neoantigen prediction algorithms. The ultimate goal of neoantigen characterization workflows is to create personalized vaccines that improve patient outcomes in diverse cancer types. BioMed Central 2019-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6714459/ /pubmed/31462330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Richters, Megan M.
Xia, Huiming
Campbell, Katie M.
Gillanders, William E.
Griffith, Obi L.
Griffith, Malachi
Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title_full Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title_fullStr Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title_full_unstemmed Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title_short Best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
title_sort best practices for bioinformatic characterization of neoantigens for clinical utility
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31462330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2
work_keys_str_mv AT richtersmeganm bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility
AT xiahuiming bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility
AT campbellkatiem bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility
AT gillanderswilliame bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility
AT griffithobil bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility
AT griffithmalachi bestpracticesforbioinformaticcharacterizationofneoantigensforclinicalutility