Cargando…

Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin

Due to variable pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires ongoing laboratory monitoring, generally with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In the ambulatory setting, clinicians who manage warfarin therapy often use time i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ting, Clara, Sylvester, Katelyn W., Schurr, James W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029618798944
_version_ 1783447133684236288
author Ting, Clara
Sylvester, Katelyn W.
Schurr, James W.
author_facet Ting, Clara
Sylvester, Katelyn W.
Schurr, James W.
author_sort Ting, Clara
collection PubMed
description Due to variable pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires ongoing laboratory monitoring, generally with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In the ambulatory setting, clinicians who manage warfarin therapy often use time in the therapeutic range (TTR) to estimate a percentage of time the international normalized ratio is therapeutic. We applied the TTR concept to aPTT monitoring for therapeutic UFH and used 2 methodologies for estimation: percentage of aPTT values in range (%aIR) and a modification of the Rosendaal method (mod-Rosendaal). This study included adult inpatients admitted between September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2016, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. For each patient, all available aPTT values were extracted to calculate 2 individual TTRs according to each methodology. Comparison between methods was performed using Student t test, and correlation was assessed with simple linear regression. A total of 255 patients were included in this study. The major outcome of TTR estimation was significantly higher using mod-Rosendaal (43.7% [26.5%]) versus %aIR (37.7% [25.7%], P = .012) by a mean difference of 6% points (95% confidence interval: 1.3-10.7). Time in the therapeutic range estimated by mod-Rosendaal significantly correlated with those estimated by %aIR (r = 0.84, P < .001). Further studies should evaluate the correlation between TTR and clinical outcomes and establish a benchmark for quality therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous UFH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6714859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67148592019-09-04 Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin Ting, Clara Sylvester, Katelyn W. Schurr, James W. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Articles Due to variable pharmacokinetic properties, therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires ongoing laboratory monitoring, generally with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In the ambulatory setting, clinicians who manage warfarin therapy often use time in the therapeutic range (TTR) to estimate a percentage of time the international normalized ratio is therapeutic. We applied the TTR concept to aPTT monitoring for therapeutic UFH and used 2 methodologies for estimation: percentage of aPTT values in range (%aIR) and a modification of the Rosendaal method (mod-Rosendaal). This study included adult inpatients admitted between September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2016, at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. For each patient, all available aPTT values were extracted to calculate 2 individual TTRs according to each methodology. Comparison between methods was performed using Student t test, and correlation was assessed with simple linear regression. A total of 255 patients were included in this study. The major outcome of TTR estimation was significantly higher using mod-Rosendaal (43.7% [26.5%]) versus %aIR (37.7% [25.7%], P = .012) by a mean difference of 6% points (95% confidence interval: 1.3-10.7). Time in the therapeutic range estimated by mod-Rosendaal significantly correlated with those estimated by %aIR (r = 0.84, P < .001). Further studies should evaluate the correlation between TTR and clinical outcomes and establish a benchmark for quality therapeutic anticoagulation with continuous UFH. SAGE Publications 2018-09-13 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6714859/ /pubmed/30213200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029618798944 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ting, Clara
Sylvester, Katelyn W.
Schurr, James W.
Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title_full Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title_fullStr Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title_full_unstemmed Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title_short Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin
title_sort time in the therapeutic range for assessing anticoagulation quality in patients receiving continuous unfractionated heparin
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029618798944
work_keys_str_mv AT tingclara timeinthetherapeuticrangeforassessinganticoagulationqualityinpatientsreceivingcontinuousunfractionatedheparin
AT sylvesterkatelynw timeinthetherapeuticrangeforassessinganticoagulationqualityinpatientsreceivingcontinuousunfractionatedheparin
AT schurrjamesw timeinthetherapeuticrangeforassessinganticoagulationqualityinpatientsreceivingcontinuousunfractionatedheparin