Cargando…

Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study

INTRODUCTION: Emergency drainage of the urinary tract is the first necessary approach in patients with urosepsis secondary to obstructive ureteral calculi. The appropriate waiting time before definitive treatment has not been determined. We hypothesized that early ureteroscopic treatment after the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astroza, Gaston M., Sarras, Miguel, Salvado, Jose Antonio, Majerson, Alejandro, Neira, Rodrigo, Dominguez, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482023
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1890
_version_ 1783447175610499072
author Astroza, Gaston M.
Sarras, Miguel
Salvado, Jose Antonio
Majerson, Alejandro
Neira, Rodrigo
Dominguez, Javier
author_facet Astroza, Gaston M.
Sarras, Miguel
Salvado, Jose Antonio
Majerson, Alejandro
Neira, Rodrigo
Dominguez, Javier
author_sort Astroza, Gaston M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Emergency drainage of the urinary tract is the first necessary approach in patients with urosepsis secondary to obstructive ureteral calculi. The appropriate waiting time before definitive treatment has not been determined. We hypothesized that early ureteroscopic treatment after the patient has been stabilized is as safe as deferred treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pilot study was developed between November 2013 and September 2017. Patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi were included. All the patients were initially decompressed with a ureteral stent. Patients were randomized to early ureteroscopic treatment (EUT), who received definitive treatment during the initial hospitalization, or deferred ureteroscopic treatment (DUT), that received definitive treatment in a second hospitalization. The stone location and size, sex distribution, age, APACHE II score, length of hospital stay, days with ureteral catheter and complications were registered. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were included in the EUT group and 13 in the DUT group. No differences in sex distribution, stone location, APACHE II score, age, stone size and time between admission and urinary drainage were found. Total length of hospital stay and complications were also similar between both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.04) and total days with double J catheter (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: EUT for ureteral stone is as safe as DUT in patients admitted with urosepsis secondary to ureterolithiasis. EUT is associated with a shorter period of ureteral stent and it is not associated with an increase in complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67150742019-09-03 Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study Astroza, Gaston M. Sarras, Miguel Salvado, Jose Antonio Majerson, Alejandro Neira, Rodrigo Dominguez, Javier Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Emergency drainage of the urinary tract is the first necessary approach in patients with urosepsis secondary to obstructive ureteral calculi. The appropriate waiting time before definitive treatment has not been determined. We hypothesized that early ureteroscopic treatment after the patient has been stabilized is as safe as deferred treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pilot study was developed between November 2013 and September 2017. Patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi were included. All the patients were initially decompressed with a ureteral stent. Patients were randomized to early ureteroscopic treatment (EUT), who received definitive treatment during the initial hospitalization, or deferred ureteroscopic treatment (DUT), that received definitive treatment in a second hospitalization. The stone location and size, sex distribution, age, APACHE II score, length of hospital stay, days with ureteral catheter and complications were registered. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were included in the EUT group and 13 in the DUT group. No differences in sex distribution, stone location, APACHE II score, age, stone size and time between admission and urinary drainage were found. Total length of hospital stay and complications were also similar between both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.04) and total days with double J catheter (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: EUT for ureteral stone is as safe as DUT in patients admitted with urosepsis secondary to ureterolithiasis. EUT is associated with a shorter period of ureteral stent and it is not associated with an increase in complications. Polish Urological Association 2019-05-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6715074/ /pubmed/31482023 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1890 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Astroza, Gaston M.
Sarras, Miguel
Salvado, Jose Antonio
Majerson, Alejandro
Neira, Rodrigo
Dominguez, Javier
Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title_full Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title_fullStr Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title_short Early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. A pilot study
title_sort early ureteroscopic treatment in patients with urosepsis associated with ureteral calculi is a safe approach. a pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482023
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1890
work_keys_str_mv AT astrozagastonm earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy
AT sarrasmiguel earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy
AT salvadojoseantonio earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy
AT majersonalejandro earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy
AT neirarodrigo earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy
AT dominguezjavier earlyureteroscopictreatmentinpatientswithurosepsisassociatedwithureteralcalculiisasafeapproachapilotstudy