Cargando…

Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pai, Aakash, Wai, Htut Aung, Ali, Miriam, Theaker, Michael, Watson, Graham, Mackie, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482024
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1928
_version_ 1783447177925754880
author Pai, Aakash
Wai, Htut Aung
Ali, Miriam
Theaker, Michael
Watson, Graham
Mackie, Simon
author_facet Pai, Aakash
Wai, Htut Aung
Ali, Miriam
Theaker, Michael
Watson, Graham
Mackie, Simon
author_sort Pai, Aakash
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period. RESULTS: Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67150842019-09-03 Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi Pai, Aakash Wai, Htut Aung Ali, Miriam Theaker, Michael Watson, Graham Mackie, Simon Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period. RESULTS: Median stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi. Polish Urological Association 2019-06-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6715084/ /pubmed/31482024 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1928 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pai, Aakash
Wai, Htut Aung
Ali, Miriam
Theaker, Michael
Watson, Graham
Mackie, Simon
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title_full Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title_fullStr Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title_short Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
title_sort outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482024
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1928
work_keys_str_mv AT paiaakash outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi
AT waihtutaung outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi
AT alimiriam outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi
AT theakermichael outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi
AT watsongraham outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi
AT mackiesimon outcomesofretrogradeintrarenalsurgerycomparedwithultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinthemanagementofrenalcalculi