Cargando…

The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who had their facial nerve exposed prior to surgery were prospectively enrolled in this study, and electromyography (EMG) recordings were o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Euyhyun, Kim, Hyunjung, Han, Hye Min, Choi, In Hak, Jung, Hak Hyun, Im, Gi Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31465477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221748
_version_ 1783447193340870656
author Park, Euyhyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Han, Hye Min
Choi, In Hak
Jung, Hak Hyun
Im, Gi Jung
author_facet Park, Euyhyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Han, Hye Min
Choi, In Hak
Jung, Hak Hyun
Im, Gi Jung
author_sort Park, Euyhyun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who had their facial nerve exposed prior to surgery were prospectively enrolled in this study, and electromyography (EMG) recordings were obtained from the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles. Four pigs were also enrolled in an animal study, and continuous stimulation was performed on the facial nerves of the pigs for 10 minutes. The EMG responses were measured and the pathologic outcomes of the facial nerve after stimulation were determined. RESULTS: In the human study, the mean intensity of the minimal electrical stimulation threshold was 0.21 mA (range: 0.1–0.3 mA). A linear correlation was observed between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for intensities below 0.4 mA. Response amplitudes reached a plateau between 0.4 mA and 1.0 mA. The minimal stimulus intensity that could generate a maximal response was 0.4 mA in the orbicularis oculi (244 μV) and orbicularis oris (545 μV). In the animal study, there were no observed changes in EMG or nerve damage incidence after the continuous stimulation of 3.0 mA. CONCLUSIONS: 0.4 mA is considered to be the optimal intensity of facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery, and it was estimated through the animal study that a stimulation of 3.0 mA is safe from facial nerve damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67151912019-09-10 The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery Park, Euyhyun Kim, Hyunjung Han, Hye Min Choi, In Hak Jung, Hak Hyun Im, Gi Jung PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who had their facial nerve exposed prior to surgery were prospectively enrolled in this study, and electromyography (EMG) recordings were obtained from the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles. Four pigs were also enrolled in an animal study, and continuous stimulation was performed on the facial nerves of the pigs for 10 minutes. The EMG responses were measured and the pathologic outcomes of the facial nerve after stimulation were determined. RESULTS: In the human study, the mean intensity of the minimal electrical stimulation threshold was 0.21 mA (range: 0.1–0.3 mA). A linear correlation was observed between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for intensities below 0.4 mA. Response amplitudes reached a plateau between 0.4 mA and 1.0 mA. The minimal stimulus intensity that could generate a maximal response was 0.4 mA in the orbicularis oculi (244 μV) and orbicularis oris (545 μV). In the animal study, there were no observed changes in EMG or nerve damage incidence after the continuous stimulation of 3.0 mA. CONCLUSIONS: 0.4 mA is considered to be the optimal intensity of facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery, and it was estimated through the animal study that a stimulation of 3.0 mA is safe from facial nerve damage. Public Library of Science 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6715191/ /pubmed/31465477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221748 Text en © 2019 Park et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Park, Euyhyun
Kim, Hyunjung
Han, Hye Min
Choi, In Hak
Jung, Hak Hyun
Im, Gi Jung
The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title_full The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title_fullStr The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title_full_unstemmed The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title_short The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
title_sort optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31465477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221748
work_keys_str_mv AT parkeuyhyun theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT kimhyunjung theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT hanhyemin theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT choiinhak theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT junghakhyun theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT imgijung theoptimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT parkeuyhyun optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT kimhyunjung optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT hanhyemin optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT choiinhak optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT junghakhyun optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery
AT imgijung optimalandsafeintensityforfacialnervestimulationduringintraoperativeneuromonitoringinmiddleearsurgery