Cargando…

The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm

Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ernst, Thomas Michael, Brol, Anna Evelina, Gratz, Marcel, Ritter, Christoph, Bingel, Ulrike, Schlamann, Marc, Maderwald, Stefan, Quick, Harald H, Merz, Christian Josef, Timmann, Dagmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464686
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46831
Descripción
Sumario:Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related design allowed us to separate cerebellar fMRI signals related to the visual conditioned stimulus (CS) from signals related to the subsequent unconditioned stimulus (US; an aversive electric shock). We found significant activation of cerebellar lobules Crus I and VI bilaterally related to the CS+ compared to the CS-. Most importantly, significant activation of lobules Crus I and VI was also present during the unexpected omission of the US in unreinforced CS+ acquisition trials. This activation disappeared during extinction when US omission became expected. These findings provide evidence that the cerebellum has to be added to the neural network processing predictions and prediction errors in the emotional domain.