Cargando…
The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm
Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464686 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46831 |
_version_ | 1783447218591629312 |
---|---|
author | Ernst, Thomas Michael Brol, Anna Evelina Gratz, Marcel Ritter, Christoph Bingel, Ulrike Schlamann, Marc Maderwald, Stefan Quick, Harald H Merz, Christian Josef Timmann, Dagmar |
author_facet | Ernst, Thomas Michael Brol, Anna Evelina Gratz, Marcel Ritter, Christoph Bingel, Ulrike Schlamann, Marc Maderwald, Stefan Quick, Harald H Merz, Christian Josef Timmann, Dagmar |
author_sort | Ernst, Thomas Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related design allowed us to separate cerebellar fMRI signals related to the visual conditioned stimulus (CS) from signals related to the subsequent unconditioned stimulus (US; an aversive electric shock). We found significant activation of cerebellar lobules Crus I and VI bilaterally related to the CS+ compared to the CS-. Most importantly, significant activation of lobules Crus I and VI was also present during the unexpected omission of the US in unreinforced CS+ acquisition trials. This activation disappeared during extinction when US omission became expected. These findings provide evidence that the cerebellum has to be added to the neural network processing predictions and prediction errors in the emotional domain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6715348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67153482019-08-30 The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm Ernst, Thomas Michael Brol, Anna Evelina Gratz, Marcel Ritter, Christoph Bingel, Ulrike Schlamann, Marc Maderwald, Stefan Quick, Harald H Merz, Christian Josef Timmann, Dagmar eLife Neuroscience Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related design allowed us to separate cerebellar fMRI signals related to the visual conditioned stimulus (CS) from signals related to the subsequent unconditioned stimulus (US; an aversive electric shock). We found significant activation of cerebellar lobules Crus I and VI bilaterally related to the CS+ compared to the CS-. Most importantly, significant activation of lobules Crus I and VI was also present during the unexpected omission of the US in unreinforced CS+ acquisition trials. This activation disappeared during extinction when US omission became expected. These findings provide evidence that the cerebellum has to be added to the neural network processing predictions and prediction errors in the emotional domain. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6715348/ /pubmed/31464686 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46831 Text en © 2019, Ernst et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ernst, Thomas Michael Brol, Anna Evelina Gratz, Marcel Ritter, Christoph Bingel, Ulrike Schlamann, Marc Maderwald, Stefan Quick, Harald H Merz, Christian Josef Timmann, Dagmar The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title | The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title_full | The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title_fullStr | The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title_short | The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
title_sort | cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464686 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ernstthomasmichael thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT brolannaevelina thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT gratzmarcel thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT ritterchristoph thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT bingelulrike thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT schlamannmarc thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT maderwaldstefan thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT quickharaldh thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT merzchristianjosef thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT timmanndagmar thecerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT ernstthomasmichael cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT brolannaevelina cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT gratzmarcel cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT ritterchristoph cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT bingelulrike cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT schlamannmarc cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT maderwaldstefan cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT quickharaldh cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT merzchristianjosef cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm AT timmanndagmar cerebellumisinvolvedinprocessingofpredictionsandpredictionerrorsinafearconditioningparadigm |