Cargando…
Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and study aims Endoscopic imaging of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with advanced technologies, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE), allows targeted biopsies and may reduce the number of random biopsies to detect esophageal neoplasia in the earl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0965-6487 |
_version_ | 1783447225635962880 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez, Maria Auxiliadora Chóez de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Ribeiro, Igor Braga Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Morita, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Marques, Sergio Barbosa Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_facet | Rodriguez, Maria Auxiliadora Chóez de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Ribeiro, Igor Braga Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Morita, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Marques, Sergio Barbosa Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux |
author_sort | Rodriguez, Maria Auxiliadora Chóez |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Endoscopic imaging of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with advanced technologies, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE), allows targeted biopsies and may reduce the number of random biopsies to detect esophageal neoplasia in the early stages during endoscopic BE surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OCT and VLE in diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) in BE. Patients and methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the primary outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of OCT and VLE, in comparison with the gold standard. In the meta-analysis, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for both methods. We performed analyses by patient and by lesion. Results We evaluated 14 studies involving a collective total of 721 patients and 1565 lesions. In the analysis by lesion, VLE showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, DOR, and SROC AUC of 85 %, 73 %, 3.2, 0.21, 15.0, and 0.87, respectively, for detection of HGD/IMC. In the analysis by lesion for detection of HGD/EAC, OCT showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, DOR, and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 89 %, 91 %, 9.6, 0.12, 81.0, and 0.95, respectively. The accuracy of OCT in identifying intestinal metaplasia showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, and DOR of 92 %, 81 %, 5.06, 0.091, and 55.58, respectively. Conclusion OCT- and VLE-guided targeted biopsies could improve detection of dysplasia and neoplasia. Further studies could determine whether the use of such biopsies might replace the current protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6715432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67154322019-09-01 Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rodriguez, Maria Auxiliadora Chóez de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Ribeiro, Igor Braga Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Morita, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Marques, Sergio Barbosa Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Endoscopic imaging of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with advanced technologies, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE), allows targeted biopsies and may reduce the number of random biopsies to detect esophageal neoplasia in the early stages during endoscopic BE surveillance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OCT and VLE in diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) in BE. Patients and methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the primary outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of OCT and VLE, in comparison with the gold standard. In the meta-analysis, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for both methods. We performed analyses by patient and by lesion. Results We evaluated 14 studies involving a collective total of 721 patients and 1565 lesions. In the analysis by lesion, VLE showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, DOR, and SROC AUC of 85 %, 73 %, 3.2, 0.21, 15.0, and 0.87, respectively, for detection of HGD/IMC. In the analysis by lesion for detection of HGD/EAC, OCT showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, DOR, and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 89 %, 91 %, 9.6, 0.12, 81.0, and 0.95, respectively. The accuracy of OCT in identifying intestinal metaplasia showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR−, and DOR of 92 %, 81 %, 5.06, 0.091, and 55.58, respectively. Conclusion OCT- and VLE-guided targeted biopsies could improve detection of dysplasia and neoplasia. Further studies could determine whether the use of such biopsies might replace the current protocol. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-09 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6715432/ /pubmed/31475224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0965-6487 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Rodriguez, Maria Auxiliadora Chóez de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux Ribeiro, Igor Braga Bernardo, Wanderley Marques Morita, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias Marques, Sergio Barbosa Sakai, Paulo de Moura, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | volumetric laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0965-6487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezmariaauxiliadorachoez volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demouradiogoturianihourneaux volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ribeiroigorbraga volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bernardowanderleymarques volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moritaflaviohiroshiananias volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marquessergiobarbosa volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sakaipaulo volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demouraeduardoguimaraeshourneaux volumetriclaserendomicroscopyandopticalcoherencetomographyinbarrettsesophagusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |