Cargando…

[(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to assess whether and to what extent monitoring response to treatment using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emitting tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) studies contribute clinically relevant data to routine clinical follo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuten, Jonathan, Sarid, David, Yossepowitch, Ofer, Mabjeesh, Nicola J., Even-Sapir, Einat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0554-1
_version_ 1783447276090294272
author Kuten, Jonathan
Sarid, David
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Mabjeesh, Nicola J.
Even-Sapir, Einat
author_facet Kuten, Jonathan
Sarid, David
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Mabjeesh, Nicola J.
Even-Sapir, Einat
author_sort Kuten, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to assess whether and to what extent monitoring response to treatment using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emitting tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) studies contribute clinically relevant data to routine clinical follow-up during treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with metastatic PCa who underwent [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurements before and during treatment were investigated. Response was categorized by serum PSA dynamics according to improvement, stable disease, and disease progression and compared to change in imaging findings on pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. McNemar’s test was used to assess agreement between PET/CT- and PSA-based responses to treatment. Thirty-four patients (65.4%) had compatible biochemical- and imaging-based response to treatment. However, the imaging and biochemical responses were discrepant in 18/52 patients (34.6%). PET/CT showed progressive disease in 5/52 patients (9.6%) and improvement/stable disease in 13/52 (25%) compared to biochemical assessment results. Discrepancy between imaging and biochemical response was most prominent in biochemically stable patients (90.9%), followed by patients with biochemical progression (33.3%), and in only few (8.7%) patients with biochemical improvement. The imaging-based response was suitable for choosing subsequent treatment in 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) with longer follow-up (median time of 10.3 months (IQR 6.3–18.2)). The relevance of the imaging methodology was reflected by its ability to assess individual lesions in cases of heterogeneous lesion responses, reveal the appearance of new lesions, and identify lesions that required specific consideration, such as targeted radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this retrospective analysis showed that biochemical responses to treatment and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-based responses to treatment differ in one third of metastatic PCa patients. The latter additionally enabled lesion-based and not solely patient-based analysis. Monitoring response during treatment by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is suitable for decision-making in patient management and choice of treatment in the majority of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67157552019-09-13 [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up? Kuten, Jonathan Sarid, David Yossepowitch, Ofer Mabjeesh, Nicola J. Even-Sapir, Einat EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to assess whether and to what extent monitoring response to treatment using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron-emitting tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) studies contribute clinically relevant data to routine clinical follow-up during treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with metastatic PCa who underwent [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measurements before and during treatment were investigated. Response was categorized by serum PSA dynamics according to improvement, stable disease, and disease progression and compared to change in imaging findings on pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. McNemar’s test was used to assess agreement between PET/CT- and PSA-based responses to treatment. Thirty-four patients (65.4%) had compatible biochemical- and imaging-based response to treatment. However, the imaging and biochemical responses were discrepant in 18/52 patients (34.6%). PET/CT showed progressive disease in 5/52 patients (9.6%) and improvement/stable disease in 13/52 (25%) compared to biochemical assessment results. Discrepancy between imaging and biochemical response was most prominent in biochemically stable patients (90.9%), followed by patients with biochemical progression (33.3%), and in only few (8.7%) patients with biochemical improvement. The imaging-based response was suitable for choosing subsequent treatment in 22 of 30 patients (73.3%) with longer follow-up (median time of 10.3 months (IQR 6.3–18.2)). The relevance of the imaging methodology was reflected by its ability to assess individual lesions in cases of heterogeneous lesion responses, reveal the appearance of new lesions, and identify lesions that required specific consideration, such as targeted radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this retrospective analysis showed that biochemical responses to treatment and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-based responses to treatment differ in one third of metastatic PCa patients. The latter additionally enabled lesion-based and not solely patient-based analysis. Monitoring response during treatment by [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is suitable for decision-making in patient management and choice of treatment in the majority of patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6715755/ /pubmed/31468235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0554-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kuten, Jonathan
Sarid, David
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Mabjeesh, Nicola J.
Even-Sapir, Einat
[(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title_full [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title_fullStr [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title_full_unstemmed [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title_short [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
title_sort [(68)ga]ga-psma-11 pet/ct for monitoring response to treatment in metastatic prostate cancer: is there any added value over standard follow-up?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0554-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kutenjonathan 68gagapsma11petctformonitoringresponsetotreatmentinmetastaticprostatecanceristhereanyaddedvalueoverstandardfollowup
AT sariddavid 68gagapsma11petctformonitoringresponsetotreatmentinmetastaticprostatecanceristhereanyaddedvalueoverstandardfollowup
AT yossepowitchofer 68gagapsma11petctformonitoringresponsetotreatmentinmetastaticprostatecanceristhereanyaddedvalueoverstandardfollowup
AT mabjeeshnicolaj 68gagapsma11petctformonitoringresponsetotreatmentinmetastaticprostatecanceristhereanyaddedvalueoverstandardfollowup
AT evensapireinat 68gagapsma11petctformonitoringresponsetotreatmentinmetastaticprostatecanceristhereanyaddedvalueoverstandardfollowup