Cargando…

The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator

Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meeson, Richard, Moazen, Mehran, Sanghani-Kerai, Anita, Osagie-Clouard, Liza, Coathup, Melanie, Blunn, Gordon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015
_version_ 1783447280094806016
author Meeson, Richard
Moazen, Mehran
Sanghani-Kerai, Anita
Osagie-Clouard, Liza
Coathup, Melanie
Blunn, Gordon
author_facet Meeson, Richard
Moazen, Mehran
Sanghani-Kerai, Anita
Osagie-Clouard, Liza
Coathup, Melanie
Blunn, Gordon
author_sort Meeson, Richard
collection PubMed
description Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously published extremes of guaranteed union (0.5 mm) and non-union (3 mm) using this model. A femoral osteotomy in 12–14 week old female Wistar rats was stabilised with a micro fixator (titanium blocks, carbon fiber bars) with an osteotomy gap of 1.0 mm (n = 5), 1.5 mm (n = 7), 2.0 mm (n = 6). After five weeks, the left femur was retrieved. The osteotomy gap was scanned using X-ray microtomography and then histologically evaluated. The radiographic union rate (complete mineralised bone bridging across the osteotomy) was three times higher for the 1.0 mm than the 2.0 mm gap. The 1.0 mm gap had the largest callus (0.069μm(3)) and bone volume (0.035μm(3)). Callus and bone volume were approximately 50% smaller within the 2.0 mm gap. Using cadaveric rat femurs stabilised with the external fixator, day 0 mechanical assessment of construct stiffness was calculated on materials testing machine displacement vs load output. The construct stiffness for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps was 32.6 ± 5.4, 32.5 ± 2.4, and 32.4 ± 8.3 N/mm (p = 0.779). Interfragmentary strain (IFS) was calculated using the change in osteotomy gap displacement as measured using microstrain miniature differential reluctance transducer spanning the osteotomy gap. Increasing the gap size significantly reduced the IFS (p = 0.013). The mean ‘day 0’ IFS for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps were 11.2 ± 1.3, 8.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.2% respectively. A 1.5 mm gap resulted in a delayed fracture healing by 5 weeks and may represent a useful test environment for fracture healing therapy. Increasing gap size did not affect construct stiffness, but did reduce the ‘day 0’ IFS, with a doubling of non-union and halving of bone volume measured between 1.0 and 2.0 mm gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67157732019-11-01 The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator Meeson, Richard Moazen, Mehran Sanghani-Kerai, Anita Osagie-Clouard, Liza Coathup, Melanie Blunn, Gordon J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Article Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously published extremes of guaranteed union (0.5 mm) and non-union (3 mm) using this model. A femoral osteotomy in 12–14 week old female Wistar rats was stabilised with a micro fixator (titanium blocks, carbon fiber bars) with an osteotomy gap of 1.0 mm (n = 5), 1.5 mm (n = 7), 2.0 mm (n = 6). After five weeks, the left femur was retrieved. The osteotomy gap was scanned using X-ray microtomography and then histologically evaluated. The radiographic union rate (complete mineralised bone bridging across the osteotomy) was three times higher for the 1.0 mm than the 2.0 mm gap. The 1.0 mm gap had the largest callus (0.069μm(3)) and bone volume (0.035μm(3)). Callus and bone volume were approximately 50% smaller within the 2.0 mm gap. Using cadaveric rat femurs stabilised with the external fixator, day 0 mechanical assessment of construct stiffness was calculated on materials testing machine displacement vs load output. The construct stiffness for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps was 32.6 ± 5.4, 32.5 ± 2.4, and 32.4 ± 8.3 N/mm (p = 0.779). Interfragmentary strain (IFS) was calculated using the change in osteotomy gap displacement as measured using microstrain miniature differential reluctance transducer spanning the osteotomy gap. Increasing the gap size significantly reduced the IFS (p = 0.013). The mean ‘day 0’ IFS for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps were 11.2 ± 1.3, 8.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.2% respectively. A 1.5 mm gap resulted in a delayed fracture healing by 5 weeks and may represent a useful test environment for fracture healing therapy. Increasing gap size did not affect construct stiffness, but did reduce the ‘day 0’ IFS, with a doubling of non-union and halving of bone volume measured between 1.0 and 2.0 mm gaps. Elsevier 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6715773/ /pubmed/31357063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Meeson, Richard
Moazen, Mehran
Sanghani-Kerai, Anita
Osagie-Clouard, Liza
Coathup, Melanie
Blunn, Gordon
The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title_full The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title_fullStr The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title_full_unstemmed The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title_short The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
title_sort influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015
work_keys_str_mv AT meesonrichard theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT moazenmehran theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT sanghanikeraianita theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT osagieclouardliza theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT coathupmelanie theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT blunngordon theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT meesonrichard influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT moazenmehran influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT sanghanikeraianita influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT osagieclouardliza influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT coathupmelanie influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator
AT blunngordon influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator