Cargando…
The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator
Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015 |
_version_ | 1783447280094806016 |
---|---|
author | Meeson, Richard Moazen, Mehran Sanghani-Kerai, Anita Osagie-Clouard, Liza Coathup, Melanie Blunn, Gordon |
author_facet | Meeson, Richard Moazen, Mehran Sanghani-Kerai, Anita Osagie-Clouard, Liza Coathup, Melanie Blunn, Gordon |
author_sort | Meeson, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously published extremes of guaranteed union (0.5 mm) and non-union (3 mm) using this model. A femoral osteotomy in 12–14 week old female Wistar rats was stabilised with a micro fixator (titanium blocks, carbon fiber bars) with an osteotomy gap of 1.0 mm (n = 5), 1.5 mm (n = 7), 2.0 mm (n = 6). After five weeks, the left femur was retrieved. The osteotomy gap was scanned using X-ray microtomography and then histologically evaluated. The radiographic union rate (complete mineralised bone bridging across the osteotomy) was three times higher for the 1.0 mm than the 2.0 mm gap. The 1.0 mm gap had the largest callus (0.069μm(3)) and bone volume (0.035μm(3)). Callus and bone volume were approximately 50% smaller within the 2.0 mm gap. Using cadaveric rat femurs stabilised with the external fixator, day 0 mechanical assessment of construct stiffness was calculated on materials testing machine displacement vs load output. The construct stiffness for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps was 32.6 ± 5.4, 32.5 ± 2.4, and 32.4 ± 8.3 N/mm (p = 0.779). Interfragmentary strain (IFS) was calculated using the change in osteotomy gap displacement as measured using microstrain miniature differential reluctance transducer spanning the osteotomy gap. Increasing the gap size significantly reduced the IFS (p = 0.013). The mean ‘day 0’ IFS for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps were 11.2 ± 1.3, 8.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.2% respectively. A 1.5 mm gap resulted in a delayed fracture healing by 5 weeks and may represent a useful test environment for fracture healing therapy. Increasing gap size did not affect construct stiffness, but did reduce the ‘day 0’ IFS, with a doubling of non-union and halving of bone volume measured between 1.0 and 2.0 mm gaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6715773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67157732019-11-01 The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator Meeson, Richard Moazen, Mehran Sanghani-Kerai, Anita Osagie-Clouard, Liza Coathup, Melanie Blunn, Gordon J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Article Increasingly, the rat femoral fracture model is being used for preclinical investigations of fracture healing, however, the effect of gap size and its influence on mechanobiology is not well understood. We aimed to evaluate the influence of osteotomy gap on osteotomy healing between the previously published extremes of guaranteed union (0.5 mm) and non-union (3 mm) using this model. A femoral osteotomy in 12–14 week old female Wistar rats was stabilised with a micro fixator (titanium blocks, carbon fiber bars) with an osteotomy gap of 1.0 mm (n = 5), 1.5 mm (n = 7), 2.0 mm (n = 6). After five weeks, the left femur was retrieved. The osteotomy gap was scanned using X-ray microtomography and then histologically evaluated. The radiographic union rate (complete mineralised bone bridging across the osteotomy) was three times higher for the 1.0 mm than the 2.0 mm gap. The 1.0 mm gap had the largest callus (0.069μm(3)) and bone volume (0.035μm(3)). Callus and bone volume were approximately 50% smaller within the 2.0 mm gap. Using cadaveric rat femurs stabilised with the external fixator, day 0 mechanical assessment of construct stiffness was calculated on materials testing machine displacement vs load output. The construct stiffness for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps was 32.6 ± 5.4, 32.5 ± 2.4, and 32.4 ± 8.3 N/mm (p = 0.779). Interfragmentary strain (IFS) was calculated using the change in osteotomy gap displacement as measured using microstrain miniature differential reluctance transducer spanning the osteotomy gap. Increasing the gap size significantly reduced the IFS (p = 0.013). The mean ‘day 0’ IFS for the 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm gaps were 11.2 ± 1.3, 8.4 ± 1.5 and 6.1 ± 1.2% respectively. A 1.5 mm gap resulted in a delayed fracture healing by 5 weeks and may represent a useful test environment for fracture healing therapy. Increasing gap size did not affect construct stiffness, but did reduce the ‘day 0’ IFS, with a doubling of non-union and halving of bone volume measured between 1.0 and 2.0 mm gaps. Elsevier 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6715773/ /pubmed/31357063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Meeson, Richard Moazen, Mehran Sanghani-Kerai, Anita Osagie-Clouard, Liza Coathup, Melanie Blunn, Gordon The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title | The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title_full | The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title_fullStr | The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title_short | The influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
title_sort | influence of gap size on the development of fracture union with a micro external fixator |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meesonrichard theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT moazenmehran theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT sanghanikeraianita theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT osagieclouardliza theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT coathupmelanie theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT blunngordon theinfluenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT meesonrichard influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT moazenmehran influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT sanghanikeraianita influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT osagieclouardliza influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT coathupmelanie influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator AT blunngordon influenceofgapsizeonthedevelopmentoffractureunionwithamicroexternalfixator |