Cargando…

Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept

INTRODUCTION: While bio‐behavioural interventions (BIs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV prevention have shown their effectiveness (e.g. treatment for syphilis, HPV vaccination or pre‐exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]), they have also aroused major concerns regarding behavioural changes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rojas Castro, Daniela, Delabre, Rosemary M, Molina, Jean‐Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25351
_version_ 1783447314841468928
author Rojas Castro, Daniela
Delabre, Rosemary M
Molina, Jean‐Michel
author_facet Rojas Castro, Daniela
Delabre, Rosemary M
Molina, Jean‐Michel
author_sort Rojas Castro, Daniela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While bio‐behavioural interventions (BIs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV prevention have shown their effectiveness (e.g. treatment for syphilis, HPV vaccination or pre‐exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]), they have also aroused major concerns regarding behavioural changes that could counteract their benefit. Risk compensation (RC) fears concerning BIs in the HIV/STIs prevention field are intimately linked to representations, judgements and social control on sexual behaviour. With an increasing number of PrEP studies describing a rise in STIs due to RC, this paper argues for a shift away from the focus on RC and proposes a more constructive approach to respond to the needs of people living with HIV and populations most at risk. DISCUSSION: The concept of RC, stemming from road safety and derived from economic theory, relies on rational theoretical models of human behaviour. Although widely applied in several contexts its use has been reasonably questioned. Major methodological issues regarding RC have been raised within HIV/AIDS literature. Although behavioural changes (e.g. condomless sex and number of sexual partners) are often erroneously assimilated with RC, there is no evidence that behavioural changes have undermined the effectiveness of previous and current BIs. Still, PrEP has not escaped RC concerns. Increases in condomless sex within the context of growing uptake of PrEP signals a continued need for integrated and innovative HIV and STI prevention strategies and a comprehensive sexual health approach. Routine HIV/STI testing, peer‐led counselling, and identification of sexual health needs within the PrEP model of care could become a gold standard in the sexual health field for all populations. CONCLUSIONS: RC remains a frequent argument against the availability and provision of prevention methods for vulnerable populations. Individuals should be able to benefit from the full panel of BIs options available, to find and adapt methods according to their needs. Current, past and future PrEP users, with other stakeholders, may provide valuable insight into innovative solutions and programmes to control HIV and other STIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6715948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67159482019-09-04 Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept Rojas Castro, Daniela Delabre, Rosemary M Molina, Jean‐Michel J Int AIDS Soc Debate INTRODUCTION: While bio‐behavioural interventions (BIs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV prevention have shown their effectiveness (e.g. treatment for syphilis, HPV vaccination or pre‐exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]), they have also aroused major concerns regarding behavioural changes that could counteract their benefit. Risk compensation (RC) fears concerning BIs in the HIV/STIs prevention field are intimately linked to representations, judgements and social control on sexual behaviour. With an increasing number of PrEP studies describing a rise in STIs due to RC, this paper argues for a shift away from the focus on RC and proposes a more constructive approach to respond to the needs of people living with HIV and populations most at risk. DISCUSSION: The concept of RC, stemming from road safety and derived from economic theory, relies on rational theoretical models of human behaviour. Although widely applied in several contexts its use has been reasonably questioned. Major methodological issues regarding RC have been raised within HIV/AIDS literature. Although behavioural changes (e.g. condomless sex and number of sexual partners) are often erroneously assimilated with RC, there is no evidence that behavioural changes have undermined the effectiveness of previous and current BIs. Still, PrEP has not escaped RC concerns. Increases in condomless sex within the context of growing uptake of PrEP signals a continued need for integrated and innovative HIV and STI prevention strategies and a comprehensive sexual health approach. Routine HIV/STI testing, peer‐led counselling, and identification of sexual health needs within the PrEP model of care could become a gold standard in the sexual health field for all populations. CONCLUSIONS: RC remains a frequent argument against the availability and provision of prevention methods for vulnerable populations. Individuals should be able to benefit from the full panel of BIs options available, to find and adapt methods according to their needs. Current, past and future PrEP users, with other stakeholders, may provide valuable insight into innovative solutions and programmes to control HIV and other STIs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6715948/ /pubmed/31468693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25351 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of the International AIDS Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate
Rojas Castro, Daniela
Delabre, Rosemary M
Molina, Jean‐Michel
Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title_full Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title_fullStr Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title_full_unstemmed Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title_short Give PrEP a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
title_sort give prep a chance: moving on from the “risk compensation” concept
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6715948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31468693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25351
work_keys_str_mv AT rojascastrodaniela giveprepachancemovingonfromtheriskcompensationconcept
AT delabrerosemarym giveprepachancemovingonfromtheriskcompensationconcept
AT molinajeanmichel giveprepachancemovingonfromtheriskcompensationconcept