Cargando…

Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindsay, Sally, Kolne, Kendall, Cagliostro, Elaine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518310
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679
_version_ 1783447375623225344
author Lindsay, Sally
Kolne, Kendall
Cagliostro, Elaine
author_facet Lindsay, Sally
Kolne, Kendall
Cagliostro, Elaine
author_sort Lindsay, Sally
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support within a format that reduces physical barriers to accessing mentors. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to synthesize and review the literature on the impact of electronic mentoring for children and youth with disabilities. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, completing comprehensive searches of 7 databases from 1993 to May 2018. We selected articles for inclusion that were peer-reviewed publications, had a sample of children or youth with disabilities (≤25 years of age), and had empirical findings with at least one outcome focusing on the impact of electronic mentoring. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and rated the study quality before discussing the findings. RESULTS: In the 25 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, 897 participants (aged 12-26, mean 17.4 years) were represented across 6 countries. Although the outcomes varied across the studies, of 11 studies testing significance, 9 (81%) reported a significant improvement in at least one of the following: career decision making, self-determination, self-advocacy, self-confidence, self-management, social skills, attitude toward disability, and coping with daily life. The electronic mentoring interventions varied in their delivery format and involved 1 or more of the following: interactive websites, virtual environment, email, mobile apps, Skype video calls, and phone calls. A total of 13 studies involved one-to-one mentoring, 6 had group-based mentoring, and 6 had a combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this review suggests it is possible that electronic mentoring is effective for children and youth with disabilities. More rigorously designed studies are needed to understand the impact and effective components of electronic mentoring interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67164342019-09-17 Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review Lindsay, Sally Kolne, Kendall Cagliostro, Elaine JMIR Pediatr Parent Review BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support within a format that reduces physical barriers to accessing mentors. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to synthesize and review the literature on the impact of electronic mentoring for children and youth with disabilities. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, completing comprehensive searches of 7 databases from 1993 to May 2018. We selected articles for inclusion that were peer-reviewed publications, had a sample of children or youth with disabilities (≤25 years of age), and had empirical findings with at least one outcome focusing on the impact of electronic mentoring. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and rated the study quality before discussing the findings. RESULTS: In the 25 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, 897 participants (aged 12-26, mean 17.4 years) were represented across 6 countries. Although the outcomes varied across the studies, of 11 studies testing significance, 9 (81%) reported a significant improvement in at least one of the following: career decision making, self-determination, self-advocacy, self-confidence, self-management, social skills, attitude toward disability, and coping with daily life. The electronic mentoring interventions varied in their delivery format and involved 1 or more of the following: interactive websites, virtual environment, email, mobile apps, Skype video calls, and phone calls. A total of 13 studies involved one-to-one mentoring, 6 had group-based mentoring, and 6 had a combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this review suggests it is possible that electronic mentoring is effective for children and youth with disabilities. More rigorously designed studies are needed to understand the impact and effective components of electronic mentoring interventions. JMIR Publications 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6716434/ /pubmed/31518310 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679 Text en ©Sally Lindsay, Kendall Kolne, Elaine Cagliostro. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (http://pediatrics.jmir.org), 24.10.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Lindsay, Sally
Kolne, Kendall
Cagliostro, Elaine
Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title_full Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title_short Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
title_sort electronic mentoring programs and interventions for children and youth with disabilities: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518310
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsaysally electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview
AT kolnekendall electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview
AT cagliostroelaine electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview