Cargando…
Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support wi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518310 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679 |
_version_ | 1783447375623225344 |
---|---|
author | Lindsay, Sally Kolne, Kendall Cagliostro, Elaine |
author_facet | Lindsay, Sally Kolne, Kendall Cagliostro, Elaine |
author_sort | Lindsay, Sally |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support within a format that reduces physical barriers to accessing mentors. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to synthesize and review the literature on the impact of electronic mentoring for children and youth with disabilities. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, completing comprehensive searches of 7 databases from 1993 to May 2018. We selected articles for inclusion that were peer-reviewed publications, had a sample of children or youth with disabilities (≤25 years of age), and had empirical findings with at least one outcome focusing on the impact of electronic mentoring. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and rated the study quality before discussing the findings. RESULTS: In the 25 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, 897 participants (aged 12-26, mean 17.4 years) were represented across 6 countries. Although the outcomes varied across the studies, of 11 studies testing significance, 9 (81%) reported a significant improvement in at least one of the following: career decision making, self-determination, self-advocacy, self-confidence, self-management, social skills, attitude toward disability, and coping with daily life. The electronic mentoring interventions varied in their delivery format and involved 1 or more of the following: interactive websites, virtual environment, email, mobile apps, Skype video calls, and phone calls. A total of 13 studies involved one-to-one mentoring, 6 had group-based mentoring, and 6 had a combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this review suggests it is possible that electronic mentoring is effective for children and youth with disabilities. More rigorously designed studies are needed to understand the impact and effective components of electronic mentoring interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6716434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67164342019-09-17 Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review Lindsay, Sally Kolne, Kendall Cagliostro, Elaine JMIR Pediatr Parent Review BACKGROUND: Children and youth with disabilities experience many challenges in their development, including higher risk of poor self-esteem, fewer friendships, and social isolation. Electronic mentoring is a potentially viable approach for youth with disabilities to access social and peer support within a format that reduces physical barriers to accessing mentors. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to synthesize and review the literature on the impact of electronic mentoring for children and youth with disabilities. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, completing comprehensive searches of 7 databases from 1993 to May 2018. We selected articles for inclusion that were peer-reviewed publications, had a sample of children or youth with disabilities (≤25 years of age), and had empirical findings with at least one outcome focusing on the impact of electronic mentoring. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and rated the study quality before discussing the findings. RESULTS: In the 25 studies meeting our inclusion criteria, 897 participants (aged 12-26, mean 17.4 years) were represented across 6 countries. Although the outcomes varied across the studies, of 11 studies testing significance, 9 (81%) reported a significant improvement in at least one of the following: career decision making, self-determination, self-advocacy, self-confidence, self-management, social skills, attitude toward disability, and coping with daily life. The electronic mentoring interventions varied in their delivery format and involved 1 or more of the following: interactive websites, virtual environment, email, mobile apps, Skype video calls, and phone calls. A total of 13 studies involved one-to-one mentoring, 6 had group-based mentoring, and 6 had a combination of both. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence in this review suggests it is possible that electronic mentoring is effective for children and youth with disabilities. More rigorously designed studies are needed to understand the impact and effective components of electronic mentoring interventions. JMIR Publications 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6716434/ /pubmed/31518310 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679 Text en ©Sally Lindsay, Kendall Kolne, Elaine Cagliostro. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (http://pediatrics.jmir.org), 24.10.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Lindsay, Sally Kolne, Kendall Cagliostro, Elaine Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title | Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title_full | Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title_short | Electronic Mentoring Programs and Interventions for Children and Youth With Disabilities: Systematic Review |
title_sort | electronic mentoring programs and interventions for children and youth with disabilities: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31518310 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/11679 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindsaysally electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview AT kolnekendall electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview AT cagliostroelaine electronicmentoringprogramsandinterventionsforchildrenandyouthwithdisabilitiessystematicreview |