Cargando…

The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance in adults with no health concerns is often linked to the thermal environment. This study assesses the impact on sleep quality of sleepwear made from fibers with different thermal insulation and hygral properties. This randomized cross-over study investigated the effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Chin Moi, Shin, Mirim, Mahar, Trevor J, Halaki, Mark, Ireland, Angus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692485
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S209116
_version_ 1783447402346184704
author Chow, Chin Moi
Shin, Mirim
Mahar, Trevor J
Halaki, Mark
Ireland, Angus
author_facet Chow, Chin Moi
Shin, Mirim
Mahar, Trevor J
Halaki, Mark
Ireland, Angus
author_sort Chow, Chin Moi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance in adults with no health concerns is often linked to the thermal environment. This study assesses the impact on sleep quality of sleepwear made from fibers with different thermal insulation and hygral properties. This randomized cross-over study investigated the effects on sleep quality of sleepwear made from cotton, polyester and Merino wool in adults aged 50–70 years, at an ambient temperature of 30 °C and a relative humidity of 50%. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy participants completed four nights of sleep study with polysomnography. Participants were categorized by body mass index as <25 kg·m(−2) or ≥25 kg·m(−2), age as <65 years or ≥65 years, and by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) as poor sleepers (PSQI≥5) or good sleepers (PSQI<5). RESULTS: Small, but statistically significant sleep benefits were observed for wool over cotton and polyester sleepwear for multiple sleep parameters, while neither cotton nor polyester was responsible for any statistically significant sleep benefit over the 11 sleep parameters examined. The key findings were: 1) A significant sleepwear effect was observed for sleep onset latency (SOL), p=0.04. 2) For older participants, sleeping in wool significantly reduced SOL (12.4 mins) compared with cotton (26.7 mins, p=0.001) or polyester (21.6 mins, p=0.001). 3) A statistically significant effect was found for sleep fragmentation index (p=0.01) in which wool sleepwear (12.1 no·h(−)(1)) was lower than polyester (13.7 no·h(−)(1)) (p=0.005), but not different to cotton (13.3 no·h(−)(1)). 4) Poor sleepers had less wakefulness when sleeping in wool compared to cotton (p=0.047). 5) And Poor sleepers had higher rapid eye movement sleep latency in polyester than in cotton (p=0.037) or in wool (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Statistically significant benefits for wool sleepwear were observed on average for all participants and, in particular, for the older and poorer sleepers. There were no significant differences in any sleep variables between sleepwear types for the BMI sub-group. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67165862019-11-05 The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions Chow, Chin Moi Shin, Mirim Mahar, Trevor J Halaki, Mark Ireland, Angus Nat Sci Sleep Original Research BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance in adults with no health concerns is often linked to the thermal environment. This study assesses the impact on sleep quality of sleepwear made from fibers with different thermal insulation and hygral properties. This randomized cross-over study investigated the effects on sleep quality of sleepwear made from cotton, polyester and Merino wool in adults aged 50–70 years, at an ambient temperature of 30 °C and a relative humidity of 50%. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy participants completed four nights of sleep study with polysomnography. Participants were categorized by body mass index as <25 kg·m(−2) or ≥25 kg·m(−2), age as <65 years or ≥65 years, and by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) as poor sleepers (PSQI≥5) or good sleepers (PSQI<5). RESULTS: Small, but statistically significant sleep benefits were observed for wool over cotton and polyester sleepwear for multiple sleep parameters, while neither cotton nor polyester was responsible for any statistically significant sleep benefit over the 11 sleep parameters examined. The key findings were: 1) A significant sleepwear effect was observed for sleep onset latency (SOL), p=0.04. 2) For older participants, sleeping in wool significantly reduced SOL (12.4 mins) compared with cotton (26.7 mins, p=0.001) or polyester (21.6 mins, p=0.001). 3) A statistically significant effect was found for sleep fragmentation index (p=0.01) in which wool sleepwear (12.1 no·h(−)(1)) was lower than polyester (13.7 no·h(−)(1)) (p=0.005), but not different to cotton (13.3 no·h(−)(1)). 4) Poor sleepers had less wakefulness when sleeping in wool compared to cotton (p=0.047). 5) And Poor sleepers had higher rapid eye movement sleep latency in polyester than in cotton (p=0.037) or in wool (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Statistically significant benefits for wool sleepwear were observed on average for all participants and, in particular, for the older and poorer sleepers. There were no significant differences in any sleep variables between sleepwear types for the BMI sub-group.  Dove 2019-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6716586/ /pubmed/31692485 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S209116 Text en © 2019 Chow et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chow, Chin Moi
Shin, Mirim
Mahar, Trevor J
Halaki, Mark
Ireland, Angus
The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title_full The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title_fullStr The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title_full_unstemmed The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title_short The impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
title_sort impact of sleepwear fiber type on sleep quality under warm ambient conditions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31692485
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S209116
work_keys_str_mv AT chowchinmoi theimpactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT shinmirim theimpactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT mahartrevorj theimpactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT halakimark theimpactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT irelandangus theimpactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT chowchinmoi impactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT shinmirim impactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT mahartrevorj impactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT halakimark impactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions
AT irelandangus impactofsleepwearfibertypeonsleepqualityunderwarmambientconditions