Cargando…

Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016

BACKGROUND: In April 2016, an emergency vaccination campaign using one dose of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) was organized in response to a cholera outbreak that started in Lusaka in February 2016. In December 2016, a second round of vaccination was conducted, with the objective of increasing the durat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferreras, Eva, Matapo, Belem, Chizema-Kawesha, Elizabeth, Chewe, Orbrie, Mzyece, Hannah, Blake, Alexandre, Moonde, Loveness, Zulu, Gideon, Poncin, Marc, Sinyange, Nyambe, Kasese-Chanda, Nancy, Phiri, Caroline, Malama, Kennedy, Mukonka, Victor, Cohuet, Sandra, Uzzeni, Florent, Ciglenecki, Iza, Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina, Luquero, Francisco J., Pezzoli, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31469853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219040
_version_ 1783447406791098368
author Ferreras, Eva
Matapo, Belem
Chizema-Kawesha, Elizabeth
Chewe, Orbrie
Mzyece, Hannah
Blake, Alexandre
Moonde, Loveness
Zulu, Gideon
Poncin, Marc
Sinyange, Nyambe
Kasese-Chanda, Nancy
Phiri, Caroline
Malama, Kennedy
Mukonka, Victor
Cohuet, Sandra
Uzzeni, Florent
Ciglenecki, Iza
Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina
Luquero, Francisco J.
Pezzoli, Lorenzo
author_facet Ferreras, Eva
Matapo, Belem
Chizema-Kawesha, Elizabeth
Chewe, Orbrie
Mzyece, Hannah
Blake, Alexandre
Moonde, Loveness
Zulu, Gideon
Poncin, Marc
Sinyange, Nyambe
Kasese-Chanda, Nancy
Phiri, Caroline
Malama, Kennedy
Mukonka, Victor
Cohuet, Sandra
Uzzeni, Florent
Ciglenecki, Iza
Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina
Luquero, Francisco J.
Pezzoli, Lorenzo
author_sort Ferreras, Eva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In April 2016, an emergency vaccination campaign using one dose of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) was organized in response to a cholera outbreak that started in Lusaka in February 2016. In December 2016, a second round of vaccination was conducted, with the objective of increasing the duration of protection, before the high-risk period for cholera transmission. We assessed vaccination coverage for the first and second rounds of the OCV campaign. METHODS: Vaccination coverage was estimated after each round from a sample selected from targeted-areas for vaccination using a cross-sectional survey in to establish the vaccination status of the individuals recruited. The study population included all individuals older than 12 months residing in the areas targeted for vaccination. We interviewed 505 randomly selected individuals after the first round and 442 after the second round. Vaccination status was ascertained either by vaccination card or verbal reporting. Households were selected using spatial random sampling. RESULTS: The vaccination coverage with two doses was 58.1% (25/43; 95%CI: 42.1–72.9) in children 1–5 years old, 59.5% (69/116; 95%CI: 49.9–68.5) in children 5–15 years old and 19.9% (56/281; 95%CI: 15.4–25.1) in adults above 15 years old. The overall dropout rate was 10.9% (95%CI: 8.1–14.1). Overall, 69.9% (n = 309/442; 95%CI: 65.4–74.1) reported to have received at least one OCV dose. CONCLUSIONS: The areas at highest risk of suffering cholera outbreaks were targeted for vaccination obtaining relatively high vaccine coverage after each round. However, the long delay between doses in areas subject to considerable population movement resulted in many individuals receiving only one OCV dose. Additional vaccination campaigns may be required to sustain protection over time in case of persistence of risk. Further evidence is needed to establish a maximum optimal interval time of a delayed second dose and variations in different settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67166332019-09-16 Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016 Ferreras, Eva Matapo, Belem Chizema-Kawesha, Elizabeth Chewe, Orbrie Mzyece, Hannah Blake, Alexandre Moonde, Loveness Zulu, Gideon Poncin, Marc Sinyange, Nyambe Kasese-Chanda, Nancy Phiri, Caroline Malama, Kennedy Mukonka, Victor Cohuet, Sandra Uzzeni, Florent Ciglenecki, Iza Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina Luquero, Francisco J. Pezzoli, Lorenzo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In April 2016, an emergency vaccination campaign using one dose of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) was organized in response to a cholera outbreak that started in Lusaka in February 2016. In December 2016, a second round of vaccination was conducted, with the objective of increasing the duration of protection, before the high-risk period for cholera transmission. We assessed vaccination coverage for the first and second rounds of the OCV campaign. METHODS: Vaccination coverage was estimated after each round from a sample selected from targeted-areas for vaccination using a cross-sectional survey in to establish the vaccination status of the individuals recruited. The study population included all individuals older than 12 months residing in the areas targeted for vaccination. We interviewed 505 randomly selected individuals after the first round and 442 after the second round. Vaccination status was ascertained either by vaccination card or verbal reporting. Households were selected using spatial random sampling. RESULTS: The vaccination coverage with two doses was 58.1% (25/43; 95%CI: 42.1–72.9) in children 1–5 years old, 59.5% (69/116; 95%CI: 49.9–68.5) in children 5–15 years old and 19.9% (56/281; 95%CI: 15.4–25.1) in adults above 15 years old. The overall dropout rate was 10.9% (95%CI: 8.1–14.1). Overall, 69.9% (n = 309/442; 95%CI: 65.4–74.1) reported to have received at least one OCV dose. CONCLUSIONS: The areas at highest risk of suffering cholera outbreaks were targeted for vaccination obtaining relatively high vaccine coverage after each round. However, the long delay between doses in areas subject to considerable population movement resulted in many individuals receiving only one OCV dose. Additional vaccination campaigns may be required to sustain protection over time in case of persistence of risk. Further evidence is needed to establish a maximum optimal interval time of a delayed second dose and variations in different settings. Public Library of Science 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6716633/ /pubmed/31469853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219040 Text en © 2019 Ferreras et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferreras, Eva
Matapo, Belem
Chizema-Kawesha, Elizabeth
Chewe, Orbrie
Mzyece, Hannah
Blake, Alexandre
Moonde, Loveness
Zulu, Gideon
Poncin, Marc
Sinyange, Nyambe
Kasese-Chanda, Nancy
Phiri, Caroline
Malama, Kennedy
Mukonka, Victor
Cohuet, Sandra
Uzzeni, Florent
Ciglenecki, Iza
Danovaro-Holliday, M. Carolina
Luquero, Francisco J.
Pezzoli, Lorenzo
Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title_full Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title_fullStr Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title_full_unstemmed Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title_short Delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: Cholera control strategy in Lusaka, 2016
title_sort delayed second dose of oral cholera vaccine administered before high-risk period for cholera transmission: cholera control strategy in lusaka, 2016
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31469853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219040
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreraseva delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT matapobelem delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT chizemakaweshaelizabeth delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT cheweorbrie delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT mzyecehannah delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT blakealexandre delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT moondeloveness delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT zulugideon delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT poncinmarc delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT sinyangenyambe delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT kasesechandanancy delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT phiricaroline delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT malamakennedy delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT mukonkavictor delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT cohuetsandra delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT uzzeniflorent delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT cigleneckiiza delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT danovarohollidaymcarolina delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT luquerofranciscoj delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016
AT pezzolilorenzo delayedseconddoseoforalcholeravaccineadministeredbeforehighriskperiodforcholeratransmissioncholeracontrolstrategyinlusaka2016