Cargando…
Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma
We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neurosci...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604 |
_version_ | 1783447417264275456 |
---|---|
author | Verbeke, Pieter Verguts, Tom |
author_facet | Verbeke, Pieter Verguts, Tom |
author_sort | Verbeke, Pieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neuroscience principles, namely Binding by Synchrony and Reinforcement Learning. The model learns to synchronize task-relevant modules, while also learning to desynchronize currently task-irrelevant modules. As a result, old (but currently task-irrelevant) information is protected from overwriting (stability) while new information can be learned quickly in currently task-relevant modules (plasticity). We combine learning to synchronize with task modules that learn via one of several classical learning algorithms (Rescorla-Wagner, backpropagation, Boltzmann machines). The resulting combined model is tested on a reversal learning paradigm where it must learn to switch between three different task rules. We demonstrate that our combined model has significant computational advantages over the original network without synchrony, in terms of both stability and plasticity. Importantly, the resulting models’ processing dynamics are also consistent with empirical data and provide empirically testable hypotheses for future MEG/EEG studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6716678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67166782019-09-10 Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma Verbeke, Pieter Verguts, Tom PLoS Comput Biol Research Article We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neuroscience principles, namely Binding by Synchrony and Reinforcement Learning. The model learns to synchronize task-relevant modules, while also learning to desynchronize currently task-irrelevant modules. As a result, old (but currently task-irrelevant) information is protected from overwriting (stability) while new information can be learned quickly in currently task-relevant modules (plasticity). We combine learning to synchronize with task modules that learn via one of several classical learning algorithms (Rescorla-Wagner, backpropagation, Boltzmann machines). The resulting combined model is tested on a reversal learning paradigm where it must learn to switch between three different task rules. We demonstrate that our combined model has significant computational advantages over the original network without synchrony, in terms of both stability and plasticity. Importantly, the resulting models’ processing dynamics are also consistent with empirical data and provide empirically testable hypotheses for future MEG/EEG studies. Public Library of Science 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6716678/ /pubmed/31430280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604 Text en © 2019 Verbeke, Verguts http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Verbeke, Pieter Verguts, Tom Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title | Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title_full | Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title_fullStr | Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title_short | Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
title_sort | learning to synchronize: how biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verbekepieter learningtosynchronizehowbiologicalagentscancoupleneuraltaskmodulesfordealingwiththestabilityplasticitydilemma AT vergutstom learningtosynchronizehowbiologicalagentscancoupleneuraltaskmodulesfordealingwiththestabilityplasticitydilemma |