Cargando…

Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Qiang, Kang, Weibiao, Chen, Changyu, Shi, Xinxin, Yang, Yang, Yu, Changjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940
_version_ 1783447419170586624
author Zheng, Qiang
Kang, Weibiao
Chen, Changyu
Shi, Xinxin
Yang, Yang
Yu, Changjun
author_facet Zheng, Qiang
Kang, Weibiao
Chen, Changyu
Shi, Xinxin
Yang, Yang
Yu, Changjun
author_sort Zheng, Qiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed effect model and random effect model were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posttest probability (PPP) of CRC. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to assess potential source of heterogeneity. We also used Egger linear regression tests to assess risk of publication bias. RESULTS: Thirteen studies had been included (679 patients: 186 with premalignant lesions and 493 with malignant lesions). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PLR, NLR, DOR and PPP for CRC screening using RS were 0.94 (0.92–0.96), 0.94 (0.88–0.97), 0.96 (0.94–0.98), 16.44 (7.80–34.63), 0.062 (0.043–0.090), 263.65 (99.03–701.96) and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RS is a potentially useful tool for future CRC screening. It also offers potentially early detection for CRC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67166862019-10-01 Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Qiang Kang, Weibiao Chen, Changyu Shi, Xinxin Yang, Yang Yu, Changjun Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed effect model and random effect model were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posttest probability (PPP) of CRC. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to assess potential source of heterogeneity. We also used Egger linear regression tests to assess risk of publication bias. RESULTS: Thirteen studies had been included (679 patients: 186 with premalignant lesions and 493 with malignant lesions). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PLR, NLR, DOR and PPP for CRC screening using RS were 0.94 (0.92–0.96), 0.94 (0.88–0.97), 0.96 (0.94–0.98), 16.44 (7.80–34.63), 0.062 (0.043–0.090), 263.65 (99.03–701.96) and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RS is a potentially useful tool for future CRC screening. It also offers potentially early detection for CRC patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6716686/ /pubmed/31441886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Zheng, Qiang
Kang, Weibiao
Chen, Changyu
Shi, Xinxin
Yang, Yang
Yu, Changjun
Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnosis accuracy of raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengqiang diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kangweibiao diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenchangyu diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shixinxin diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangyang diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuchangjun diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis