Cargando…
Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940 |
_version_ | 1783447419170586624 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Qiang Kang, Weibiao Chen, Changyu Shi, Xinxin Yang, Yang Yu, Changjun |
author_facet | Zheng, Qiang Kang, Weibiao Chen, Changyu Shi, Xinxin Yang, Yang Yu, Changjun |
author_sort | Zheng, Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed effect model and random effect model were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posttest probability (PPP) of CRC. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to assess potential source of heterogeneity. We also used Egger linear regression tests to assess risk of publication bias. RESULTS: Thirteen studies had been included (679 patients: 186 with premalignant lesions and 493 with malignant lesions). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PLR, NLR, DOR and PPP for CRC screening using RS were 0.94 (0.92–0.96), 0.94 (0.88–0.97), 0.96 (0.94–0.98), 16.44 (7.80–34.63), 0.062 (0.043–0.090), 263.65 (99.03–701.96) and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RS is a potentially useful tool for future CRC screening. It also offers potentially early detection for CRC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6716686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67166862019-10-01 Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Qiang Kang, Weibiao Chen, Changyu Shi, Xinxin Yang, Yang Yu, Changjun Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients still remains underestimated. We performed this meta-analysis to elucidate the diagnostic value in CRC patients. METHODS: We systematically searched electronic databases for published articles. Fixed effect model and random effect model were used to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and positive posttest probability (PPP) of CRC. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to assess potential source of heterogeneity. We also used Egger linear regression tests to assess risk of publication bias. RESULTS: Thirteen studies had been included (679 patients: 186 with premalignant lesions and 493 with malignant lesions). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PLR, NLR, DOR and PPP for CRC screening using RS were 0.94 (0.92–0.96), 0.94 (0.88–0.97), 0.96 (0.94–0.98), 16.44 (7.80–34.63), 0.062 (0.043–0.090), 263.65 (99.03–701.96) and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RS is a potentially useful tool for future CRC screening. It also offers potentially early detection for CRC patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6716686/ /pubmed/31441886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Zheng, Qiang Kang, Weibiao Chen, Changyu Shi, Xinxin Yang, Yang Yu, Changjun Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnosis accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnosis accuracy of raman spectroscopy in colorectal cancer: a prisma-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengqiang diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kangweibiao diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenchangyu diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shixinxin diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangyang diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuchangjun diagnosisaccuracyoframanspectroscopyincolorectalcanceraprismacompliantsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |