Cargando…

Finite element analysis of spiral plate and Herbert screw fixation for treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures

Both spiral plate and Herbert screw fixations have been clinically adopted for treating midshaft displaced clavicle fractures. However, the biomechanical properties of the 2 implant fixations have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. Here we report the results of a finite element analysis of the biome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaojuan, Cheng, Xiaodong, Yin, Bing, Wang, Jianzhao, Li, Sheng, Liu, Guobin, Hu, Zusheng, Wu, Weiwei, Zhang, Yingze
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31441868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016898
Descripción
Sumario:Both spiral plate and Herbert screw fixations have been clinically adopted for treating midshaft displaced clavicle fractures. However, the biomechanical properties of the 2 implant fixations have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. Here we report the results of a finite element analysis of the biomechanical properties of midshaft clavicle fractures treated with Herbert screw and spiral plate fixation. Hebert screw fixation showed stress distribution similar to intact clavicle under all loading conditions, but provided less stability than did spiral plate fixation. Postoperatively, excessive shoulder activities and weight-bearing should be avoided. Spiral plate fixation provides greater stability, but is associated with stress shielding. These results demonstrate that Herbert screw fixation is suitable for the treatment of simple displaced clavicluar fractures, but excessive shoulder activity and weight-bearing should be avoided after the operation. Therefore, spiral plate fixation may be preferred for patients requiring an early return to activity.