Cargando…

Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)

BACKGROUND: Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turnbull, D., Salter, A., Simpson, B., Mol, B. W., Chandraharan, E., McPhee, A., Symonds, I., Benton, M., Kuah, S., Matthews, G., Howard, K., Wilkinson, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
_version_ 1783447443924320256
author Turnbull, D.
Salter, A.
Simpson, B.
Mol, B. W.
Chandraharan, E.
McPhee, A.
Symonds, I.
Benton, M.
Kuah, S.
Matthews, G.
Howard, K.
Wilkinson, C.
author_facet Turnbull, D.
Salter, A.
Simpson, B.
Mol, B. W.
Chandraharan, E.
McPhee, A.
Symonds, I.
Benton, M.
Kuah, S.
Matthews, G.
Howard, K.
Wilkinson, C.
author_sort Turnbull, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. METHODS: This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67168092019-09-04 Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START) Turnbull, D. Salter, A. Simpson, B. Mol, B. W. Chandraharan, E. McPhee, A. Symonds, I. Benton, M. Kuah, S. Matthews, G. Howard, K. Wilkinson, C. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress. METHODS: This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268. Registered on 19 January 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6716809/ /pubmed/31464638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Turnbull, D.
Salter, A.
Simpson, B.
Mol, B. W.
Chandraharan, E.
McPhee, A.
Symonds, I.
Benton, M.
Kuah, S.
Matthews, G.
Howard, K.
Wilkinson, C.
Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title_full Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title_fullStr Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title_short Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START)
title_sort comparing the effect of stan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (ctg) plus analysis of the st segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with ctg alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the stan australian randomised controlled trial (start)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
work_keys_str_mv AT turnbulld comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT saltera comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT simpsonb comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT molbw comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT chandraharane comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT mcpheea comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT symondsi comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT bentonm comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT kuahs comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT matthewsg comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT howardk comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart
AT wilkinsonc comparingtheeffectofstancardiotocographicelectronicfetalmonitoringctgplusanalysisofthestsegmentofthefetalelectrocardiogramwithctgaloneonemergencycaesareansectionratesstudyprotocolforthestanaustralianrandomisedcontrolledtrialstart