Cargando…

The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabak, Ekaterina, Hudcova, Jana, Magyarics, Zoltán, Stulik, Lukas, Goggin, Marie, Szijártó, Valéria, Nagy, Eszter, Stevens, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7
_version_ 1783447454748770304
author Kabak, Ekaterina
Hudcova, Jana
Magyarics, Zoltán
Stulik, Lukas
Goggin, Marie
Szijártó, Valéria
Nagy, Eszter
Stevens, Chris
author_facet Kabak, Ekaterina
Hudcova, Jana
Magyarics, Zoltán
Stulik, Lukas
Goggin, Marie
Szijártó, Valéria
Nagy, Eszter
Stevens, Chris
author_sort Kabak, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in the endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is useful for identifying mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are at risk of developing VAP. METHODS: 240 patients admitted to 3 ICUs at the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (Burlington, MA) between June 2014 and June 2015 and mechanically ventilated for > 2 days were included. ETA samples and clinical data were collected. Airway colonization was assessed, and subsequently categorized into “heavy” and “light” by semi-quantitative microbiological analysis of ETAs. VAP was diagnosed retrospectively by the study sponsor according to a pre-specified pneumonia definition. RESULTS: Pathogenic bacteria were isolated from ETAs of 125 patients. The most common species isolated was S. aureus (56.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli (35.2% combined). VAP was diagnosed in 85 patients, 44 (51.7%) with no bacterial pathogen, 18 associated with S. aureus and 18 Gram-negative-only cases, and 5 associated with other Gram-positive or mixed species. A higher proportion of patients who were heavily colonized with S. aureus developed VAP (32.4%) associated with S. aureus compared to those lightly colonized (17.6%). The same tendency was seen for patients heavily and lightly colonized with Gram-negative pathogens (30.0 and 0.0%, respectively). Detection of S. aureus in the ETA preceded S. aureus VAP by approximately 4 days, while Gram-negative organisms were first detected 2.5 days prior to Gram-negative VAP. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization regardless of microbiologic cause when compared to patients who did not develop VAP. CONCLUSIONS: The overall VAP rate was 35%. Heavy tracheal colonization supported identification of patients at higher risk of developing a corresponding S. aureus or Gram-negative VAP. Detection of bacterial ETA-positivity tended to precede VAP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67168552019-09-04 The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study Kabak, Ekaterina Hudcova, Jana Magyarics, Zoltán Stulik, Lukas Goggin, Marie Szijártó, Valéria Nagy, Eszter Stevens, Chris BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in the endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is useful for identifying mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are at risk of developing VAP. METHODS: 240 patients admitted to 3 ICUs at the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (Burlington, MA) between June 2014 and June 2015 and mechanically ventilated for > 2 days were included. ETA samples and clinical data were collected. Airway colonization was assessed, and subsequently categorized into “heavy” and “light” by semi-quantitative microbiological analysis of ETAs. VAP was diagnosed retrospectively by the study sponsor according to a pre-specified pneumonia definition. RESULTS: Pathogenic bacteria were isolated from ETAs of 125 patients. The most common species isolated was S. aureus (56.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli (35.2% combined). VAP was diagnosed in 85 patients, 44 (51.7%) with no bacterial pathogen, 18 associated with S. aureus and 18 Gram-negative-only cases, and 5 associated with other Gram-positive or mixed species. A higher proportion of patients who were heavily colonized with S. aureus developed VAP (32.4%) associated with S. aureus compared to those lightly colonized (17.6%). The same tendency was seen for patients heavily and lightly colonized with Gram-negative pathogens (30.0 and 0.0%, respectively). Detection of S. aureus in the ETA preceded S. aureus VAP by approximately 4 days, while Gram-negative organisms were first detected 2.5 days prior to Gram-negative VAP. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization regardless of microbiologic cause when compared to patients who did not develop VAP. CONCLUSIONS: The overall VAP rate was 35%. Heavy tracheal colonization supported identification of patients at higher risk of developing a corresponding S. aureus or Gram-negative VAP. Detection of bacterial ETA-positivity tended to precede VAP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6716855/ /pubmed/31464593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kabak, Ekaterina
Hudcova, Jana
Magyarics, Zoltán
Stulik, Lukas
Goggin, Marie
Szijártó, Valéria
Nagy, Eszter
Stevens, Chris
The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_full The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_fullStr The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_short The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_sort utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kabakekaterina theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hudcovajana theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT magyaricszoltan theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stuliklukas theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gogginmarie theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT szijartovaleria theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nagyeszter theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stevenschris theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kabakekaterina utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hudcovajana utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT magyaricszoltan utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stuliklukas utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gogginmarie utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT szijartovaleria utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nagyeszter utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stevenschris utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy