Cargando…
Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and revi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4 |
_version_ | 1783447461658886144 |
---|---|
author | Bandali, Sarah Thomas, Camille Wamalwa, Phidelis Mahendra, Shanti Kaimenyi, Peter Warfa, Osman Fulton, Nicole |
author_facet | Bandali, Sarah Thomas, Camille Wamalwa, Phidelis Mahendra, Shanti Kaimenyi, Peter Warfa, Osman Fulton, Nicole |
author_sort | Bandali, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and reviews between 2014 and 2017 throughout Kenya based on data from the District Health Information System. Qualitative methods helped further understand the success of perinatal death reporting and review in Bungoma county through focus group discussions and individual interviews at 5 hospitals and 1 health centre. Thematic analysis was used to draw out codes for the analysis. RESULTS: Only 13 of the 47 counties in Kenya conduct perinatal death reviews. In 2017, the year after the perinatal death review system was introduced, only 3.6% of perinatal deaths were reviewed in Kenya. Bungoma county has made the greatest strides in Kenya, reviewing 59% of the perinatal deaths that occurred within the county in 2017. Bungoma accounted for 51% of all the perinatal deaths reviewed in Kenya. Factors contributing to the success in Bungoma include harmonisation of facility based perinatal reporting tools with the national level; prioritising the need to document and report mortalities; tailoring continual medical education and supportive supervision visits to needs identified from the review; and better documentation and referral processes. Supportive management and administrative staff have also helped drive forward implementation of actions and increased health staff motivation to reduce perinatal deaths and improve quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of perinatal death reviews requires clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for action, which are routinely monitored to track implementation progress. As in other low-income settings, Bungoma county has demonstrated that in Kenya, perinatal death reviews can be effectively implemented and sustained, through a focus on learning, solution-oriented responses, influencing those in a power to act, accountability for results, and observable quality of care improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6716884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67168842019-09-04 Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up Bandali, Sarah Thomas, Camille Wamalwa, Phidelis Mahendra, Shanti Kaimenyi, Peter Warfa, Osman Fulton, Nicole BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and reviews between 2014 and 2017 throughout Kenya based on data from the District Health Information System. Qualitative methods helped further understand the success of perinatal death reporting and review in Bungoma county through focus group discussions and individual interviews at 5 hospitals and 1 health centre. Thematic analysis was used to draw out codes for the analysis. RESULTS: Only 13 of the 47 counties in Kenya conduct perinatal death reviews. In 2017, the year after the perinatal death review system was introduced, only 3.6% of perinatal deaths were reviewed in Kenya. Bungoma county has made the greatest strides in Kenya, reviewing 59% of the perinatal deaths that occurred within the county in 2017. Bungoma accounted for 51% of all the perinatal deaths reviewed in Kenya. Factors contributing to the success in Bungoma include harmonisation of facility based perinatal reporting tools with the national level; prioritising the need to document and report mortalities; tailoring continual medical education and supportive supervision visits to needs identified from the review; and better documentation and referral processes. Supportive management and administrative staff have also helped drive forward implementation of actions and increased health staff motivation to reduce perinatal deaths and improve quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of perinatal death reviews requires clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for action, which are routinely monitored to track implementation progress. As in other low-income settings, Bungoma county has demonstrated that in Kenya, perinatal death reviews can be effectively implemented and sustained, through a focus on learning, solution-oriented responses, influencing those in a power to act, accountability for results, and observable quality of care improvements. BioMed Central 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6716884/ /pubmed/31470854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bandali, Sarah Thomas, Camille Wamalwa, Phidelis Mahendra, Shanti Kaimenyi, Peter Warfa, Osman Fulton, Nicole Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title | Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title_full | Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title_fullStr | Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title_short | Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up |
title_sort | strengthening the “p” in maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in bungoma county, kenya: implications for scale-up |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bandalisarah strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT thomascamille strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT wamalwaphidelis strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT mahendrashanti strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT kaimenyipeter strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT warfaosman strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup AT fultonnicole strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup |