Cargando…

Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up

BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bandali, Sarah, Thomas, Camille, Wamalwa, Phidelis, Mahendra, Shanti, Kaimenyi, Peter, Warfa, Osman, Fulton, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4
_version_ 1783447461658886144
author Bandali, Sarah
Thomas, Camille
Wamalwa, Phidelis
Mahendra, Shanti
Kaimenyi, Peter
Warfa, Osman
Fulton, Nicole
author_facet Bandali, Sarah
Thomas, Camille
Wamalwa, Phidelis
Mahendra, Shanti
Kaimenyi, Peter
Warfa, Osman
Fulton, Nicole
author_sort Bandali, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and reviews between 2014 and 2017 throughout Kenya based on data from the District Health Information System. Qualitative methods helped further understand the success of perinatal death reporting and review in Bungoma county through focus group discussions and individual interviews at 5 hospitals and 1 health centre. Thematic analysis was used to draw out codes for the analysis. RESULTS: Only 13 of the 47 counties in Kenya conduct perinatal death reviews. In 2017, the year after the perinatal death review system was introduced, only 3.6% of perinatal deaths were reviewed in Kenya. Bungoma county has made the greatest strides in Kenya, reviewing 59% of the perinatal deaths that occurred within the county in 2017. Bungoma accounted for 51% of all the perinatal deaths reviewed in Kenya. Factors contributing to the success in Bungoma include harmonisation of facility based perinatal reporting tools with the national level; prioritising the need to document and report mortalities; tailoring continual medical education and supportive supervision visits to needs identified from the review; and better documentation and referral processes. Supportive management and administrative staff have also helped drive forward implementation of actions and increased health staff motivation to reduce perinatal deaths and improve quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of perinatal death reviews requires clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for action, which are routinely monitored to track implementation progress. As in other low-income settings, Bungoma county has demonstrated that in Kenya, perinatal death reviews can be effectively implemented and sustained, through a focus on learning, solution-oriented responses, influencing those in a power to act, accountability for results, and observable quality of care improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6716884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67168842019-09-04 Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up Bandali, Sarah Thomas, Camille Wamalwa, Phidelis Mahendra, Shanti Kaimenyi, Peter Warfa, Osman Fulton, Nicole BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This paper examines perinatal death reporting and reviews in Bungoma county, Kenya, where substantial progress has been made, providing important insights for wider scale up to other contexts. METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to analyse trends in perinatal death reporting and reviews between 2014 and 2017 throughout Kenya based on data from the District Health Information System. Qualitative methods helped further understand the success of perinatal death reporting and review in Bungoma county through focus group discussions and individual interviews at 5 hospitals and 1 health centre. Thematic analysis was used to draw out codes for the analysis. RESULTS: Only 13 of the 47 counties in Kenya conduct perinatal death reviews. In 2017, the year after the perinatal death review system was introduced, only 3.6% of perinatal deaths were reviewed in Kenya. Bungoma county has made the greatest strides in Kenya, reviewing 59% of the perinatal deaths that occurred within the county in 2017. Bungoma accounted for 51% of all the perinatal deaths reviewed in Kenya. Factors contributing to the success in Bungoma include harmonisation of facility based perinatal reporting tools with the national level; prioritising the need to document and report mortalities; tailoring continual medical education and supportive supervision visits to needs identified from the review; and better documentation and referral processes. Supportive management and administrative staff have also helped drive forward implementation of actions and increased health staff motivation to reduce perinatal deaths and improve quality of care. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of perinatal death reviews requires clear delineation of roles and responsibilities for action, which are routinely monitored to track implementation progress. As in other low-income settings, Bungoma county has demonstrated that in Kenya, perinatal death reviews can be effectively implemented and sustained, through a focus on learning, solution-oriented responses, influencing those in a power to act, accountability for results, and observable quality of care improvements. BioMed Central 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6716884/ /pubmed/31470854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bandali, Sarah
Thomas, Camille
Wamalwa, Phidelis
Mahendra, Shanti
Kaimenyi, Peter
Warfa, Osman
Fulton, Nicole
Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title_full Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title_fullStr Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title_short Strengthening the “P” in Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response in Bungoma county, Kenya: implications for scale-up
title_sort strengthening the “p” in maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in bungoma county, kenya: implications for scale-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4431-4
work_keys_str_mv AT bandalisarah strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT thomascamille strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT wamalwaphidelis strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT mahendrashanti strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT kaimenyipeter strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT warfaosman strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup
AT fultonnicole strengtheningthepinmaternalandperinataldeathsurveillanceandresponseinbungomacountykenyaimplicationsforscaleup