Cargando…

Effect of cardiac surgery on respiratory muscle strength

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary complications, such as atelectasis, pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion, bronchospasm, and pneumonia, have been reported following cardiac surgery. Shallow breathing leading to impaired lung function is the major cause of respiratory complications. Decreases in respiratory muscl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naseer, Bangi A., Al-Shenqiti, Abdullah M., Ali, Abdul Rahman H., Aljeraisi, Talal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taibah University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.06.002
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary complications, such as atelectasis, pulmonary oedema, pleural effusion, bronchospasm, and pneumonia, have been reported following cardiac surgery. Shallow breathing leading to impaired lung function is the major cause of respiratory complications. Decreases in respiratory muscle strength can be measured using the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) produced in the oral cavity. This study aimed to determine the decrease in respiratory muscle strength 8 weeks following cardiac surgery. Moreover, the relationship between lung function and respiratory muscle strength was studied. METHODS: In this observational study, 42 adult cardiac surgery patients (10 women, 32 men; mean age 65 ± 7 years) were investigated. Lung function and respiratory muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The pre- and postoperative respiratory muscle strengths were in accordance with the predicted values. The MIP was 81.75 ± 22.04 cmH(2)O preoperatively and 74.56 ± 18.86 cmH(2)O at the 2-month follow-up (p = 0.146). The MEP was 98.55 ± 22.24 cmH(2)O preoperatively and 88.86 ± 18.14 cmH(2)O at the 2-month follow-up (p = 0.19). The preoperative lung function was in accordance with the predicted values; however, lung function significantly decreased postoperatively. At the 2-month follow-up, there was a moderate correlation between the MIP and forced expiratory volume (r = 0.59, p = 0 .0078). CONCLUSIONS: The respiratory muscle strength was not impeded either before or 2 months after cardiac surgery. However, the exact mechanism for the alteration in lung function remains unclear. Measures to re-establish the ideal postoperative lung capacity should concentrate on different perioperative pulmonary exercises.