Cargando…

Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the departme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Berg, Pieter F., Yakar, Derya, Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M., Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O., Kwee, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z
_version_ 1783447511876239360
author van den Berg, Pieter F.
Yakar, Derya
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Kwee, Thomas C.
author_facet van den Berg, Pieter F.
Yakar, Derya
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Kwee, Thomas C.
author_sort van den Berg, Pieter F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the department of radiology of a European tertiary care center within a 9-year period. RESULTS: A total of 94 written patient complaints were included. Overall complaint frequency was 14.4 per 100,000 radiological procedures. Complaint frequencies per 100,000 procedures were 103.7 for interventional radiology, 13.9 for MRI, 6.9 for ultrasonography, 6.5 for CT, 4.5 for fluoroscopy, and 1.2 for conventional radiography. Interventional radiology received significantly more complaints than all other radiological procedures (p < 0.001), and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, and ultrasonography) received significantly more complaints than conventional radiography (p < 0.001). Fifty-three (56.4%) complaints belonged to the clinical domain, 22 (23.4%) to the relationships domain, and 19 (20.2%) to the management domain. Quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%) constituted almost all complaint categories. Patient journey (19.1%), delays (18.1%), communication breakdown (16.0%), errors in diagnosis (11.7%), quality of care (9.6%), treatment (6.4%), and staff attitudes (2.1%) constituted almost all complaint subcategories. Annual frequency of complaints decreased over time (Mann-Kendall tau = − 0.429), although not significantly (p = 0.174). CONCLUSION: Written patient complaints directed to a department of radiology at a European tertiary care center are relatively few in number and have not shown a temporal increase. Knowledge of sources of patient dissatisfaction may help to reduce the number of patient complaints and improve patient care. KEY POINTS: • Approximately 14.4 written patient complaints per 100,000 radiological procedures are filed in a European tertiary care center, and they have not increased over a 9-year period. • Written patient complaints most frequently involve interventional radiology, and the main complaint categories are quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%). • Knowledge of the nature of and circumstances under which patient complaints arise may reduce their number and improve patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67171742019-09-13 Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center van den Berg, Pieter F. Yakar, Derya Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Kwee, Thomas C. Eur Radiol Malpractice OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the department of radiology of a European tertiary care center within a 9-year period. RESULTS: A total of 94 written patient complaints were included. Overall complaint frequency was 14.4 per 100,000 radiological procedures. Complaint frequencies per 100,000 procedures were 103.7 for interventional radiology, 13.9 for MRI, 6.9 for ultrasonography, 6.5 for CT, 4.5 for fluoroscopy, and 1.2 for conventional radiography. Interventional radiology received significantly more complaints than all other radiological procedures (p < 0.001), and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, and ultrasonography) received significantly more complaints than conventional radiography (p < 0.001). Fifty-three (56.4%) complaints belonged to the clinical domain, 22 (23.4%) to the relationships domain, and 19 (20.2%) to the management domain. Quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%) constituted almost all complaint categories. Patient journey (19.1%), delays (18.1%), communication breakdown (16.0%), errors in diagnosis (11.7%), quality of care (9.6%), treatment (6.4%), and staff attitudes (2.1%) constituted almost all complaint subcategories. Annual frequency of complaints decreased over time (Mann-Kendall tau = − 0.429), although not significantly (p = 0.174). CONCLUSION: Written patient complaints directed to a department of radiology at a European tertiary care center are relatively few in number and have not shown a temporal increase. Knowledge of sources of patient dissatisfaction may help to reduce the number of patient complaints and improve patient care. KEY POINTS: • Approximately 14.4 written patient complaints per 100,000 radiological procedures are filed in a European tertiary care center, and they have not increased over a 9-year period. • Written patient complaints most frequently involve interventional radiology, and the main complaint categories are quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%). • Knowledge of the nature of and circumstances under which patient complaints arise may reduce their number and improve patient care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717174/ /pubmed/30903338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Malpractice
van den Berg, Pieter F.
Yakar, Derya
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O.
Kwee, Thomas C.
Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title_full Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title_fullStr Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title_short Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
title_sort patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a european tertiary care center
topic Malpractice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbergpieterf patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT yakarderya patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT glaudemansandorwjm patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT dierckxrudiajo patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter
AT kweethomasc patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter