Cargando…
Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the departme...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z |
_version_ | 1783447511876239360 |
---|---|
author | van den Berg, Pieter F. Yakar, Derya Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Kwee, Thomas C. |
author_facet | van den Berg, Pieter F. Yakar, Derya Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Kwee, Thomas C. |
author_sort | van den Berg, Pieter F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the department of radiology of a European tertiary care center within a 9-year period. RESULTS: A total of 94 written patient complaints were included. Overall complaint frequency was 14.4 per 100,000 radiological procedures. Complaint frequencies per 100,000 procedures were 103.7 for interventional radiology, 13.9 for MRI, 6.9 for ultrasonography, 6.5 for CT, 4.5 for fluoroscopy, and 1.2 for conventional radiography. Interventional radiology received significantly more complaints than all other radiological procedures (p < 0.001), and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, and ultrasonography) received significantly more complaints than conventional radiography (p < 0.001). Fifty-three (56.4%) complaints belonged to the clinical domain, 22 (23.4%) to the relationships domain, and 19 (20.2%) to the management domain. Quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%) constituted almost all complaint categories. Patient journey (19.1%), delays (18.1%), communication breakdown (16.0%), errors in diagnosis (11.7%), quality of care (9.6%), treatment (6.4%), and staff attitudes (2.1%) constituted almost all complaint subcategories. Annual frequency of complaints decreased over time (Mann-Kendall tau = − 0.429), although not significantly (p = 0.174). CONCLUSION: Written patient complaints directed to a department of radiology at a European tertiary care center are relatively few in number and have not shown a temporal increase. Knowledge of sources of patient dissatisfaction may help to reduce the number of patient complaints and improve patient care. KEY POINTS: • Approximately 14.4 written patient complaints per 100,000 radiological procedures are filed in a European tertiary care center, and they have not increased over a 9-year period. • Written patient complaints most frequently involve interventional radiology, and the main complaint categories are quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%). • Knowledge of the nature of and circumstances under which patient complaints arise may reduce their number and improve patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6717174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67171742019-09-13 Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center van den Berg, Pieter F. Yakar, Derya Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Kwee, Thomas C. Eur Radiol Malpractice OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center. METHODS: This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the department of radiology of a European tertiary care center within a 9-year period. RESULTS: A total of 94 written patient complaints were included. Overall complaint frequency was 14.4 per 100,000 radiological procedures. Complaint frequencies per 100,000 procedures were 103.7 for interventional radiology, 13.9 for MRI, 6.9 for ultrasonography, 6.5 for CT, 4.5 for fluoroscopy, and 1.2 for conventional radiography. Interventional radiology received significantly more complaints than all other radiological procedures (p < 0.001), and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, and ultrasonography) received significantly more complaints than conventional radiography (p < 0.001). Fifty-three (56.4%) complaints belonged to the clinical domain, 22 (23.4%) to the relationships domain, and 19 (20.2%) to the management domain. Quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%) constituted almost all complaint categories. Patient journey (19.1%), delays (18.1%), communication breakdown (16.0%), errors in diagnosis (11.7%), quality of care (9.6%), treatment (6.4%), and staff attitudes (2.1%) constituted almost all complaint subcategories. Annual frequency of complaints decreased over time (Mann-Kendall tau = − 0.429), although not significantly (p = 0.174). CONCLUSION: Written patient complaints directed to a department of radiology at a European tertiary care center are relatively few in number and have not shown a temporal increase. Knowledge of sources of patient dissatisfaction may help to reduce the number of patient complaints and improve patient care. KEY POINTS: • Approximately 14.4 written patient complaints per 100,000 radiological procedures are filed in a European tertiary care center, and they have not increased over a 9-year period. • Written patient complaints most frequently involve interventional radiology, and the main complaint categories are quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%). • Knowledge of the nature of and circumstances under which patient complaints arise may reduce their number and improve patient care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-22 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717174/ /pubmed/30903338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Malpractice van den Berg, Pieter F. Yakar, Derya Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. Kwee, Thomas C. Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title | Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title_full | Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title_fullStr | Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title_short | Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center |
title_sort | patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a european tertiary care center |
topic | Malpractice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbergpieterf patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter AT yakarderya patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter AT glaudemansandorwjm patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter AT dierckxrudiajo patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter AT kweethomasc patientcomplaintsinradiology9yearexperienceataeuropeantertiarycarecenter |