Cargando…

Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries

OBJECTIVES: The gold standard of postpartum anal sphincter imaging has been the 3D endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed anal sphincter evaluation without the use of endoanal coils. The aim of this study is to compare these two modalities in diagnosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirss, Jaan, Huhtinen, Heikki, Niskanen, Eini, Ruohonen, Jyrki, Kallio-Packalen, Marja, Victorzon, Sarita, Victorzon, Mikael, Pinta, Tarja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8
_version_ 1783447513530892288
author Kirss, Jaan
Huhtinen, Heikki
Niskanen, Eini
Ruohonen, Jyrki
Kallio-Packalen, Marja
Victorzon, Sarita
Victorzon, Mikael
Pinta, Tarja
author_facet Kirss, Jaan
Huhtinen, Heikki
Niskanen, Eini
Ruohonen, Jyrki
Kallio-Packalen, Marja
Victorzon, Sarita
Victorzon, Mikael
Pinta, Tarja
author_sort Kirss, Jaan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The gold standard of postpartum anal sphincter imaging has been the 3D endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed anal sphincter evaluation without the use of endoanal coils. The aim of this study is to compare these two modalities in diagnosing residual sphincter lesions post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). METHODS: Forty women were followed up after primary repair of OASI with both 3D EAUS and external phased array MRI. Details of the anal sphincter injury and sphincter musculature were gathered and analysed. RESULTS: There was a moderate interrater reliability (κ = 0.510) between the two imaging modalities in detecting sphincter lesions, with more lesions detected by MRI. There was a moderate intraclass correlation (ICC) between the circumference of the tear (κ = 0.506) and a fair ICC between the external anal sphincter thickness measurements at locations 3 and 9 on the proctologic clock face (κ = 0.320) and (κ = 0.336). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that the use of external phased array MRI is feasible for detecting obstetric anal sphincter lesions postpartum. This allows for imaging of the sphincter defects in centres where EAUS imaging is not available. KEY POINTS: • A two centre prospective study that showed external phased array MRI to be a valid imaging modality for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67171812019-09-13 Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries Kirss, Jaan Huhtinen, Heikki Niskanen, Eini Ruohonen, Jyrki Kallio-Packalen, Marja Victorzon, Sarita Victorzon, Mikael Pinta, Tarja Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVES: The gold standard of postpartum anal sphincter imaging has been the 3D endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). Development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has allowed anal sphincter evaluation without the use of endoanal coils. The aim of this study is to compare these two modalities in diagnosing residual sphincter lesions post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). METHODS: Forty women were followed up after primary repair of OASI with both 3D EAUS and external phased array MRI. Details of the anal sphincter injury and sphincter musculature were gathered and analysed. RESULTS: There was a moderate interrater reliability (κ = 0.510) between the two imaging modalities in detecting sphincter lesions, with more lesions detected by MRI. There was a moderate intraclass correlation (ICC) between the circumference of the tear (κ = 0.506) and a fair ICC between the external anal sphincter thickness measurements at locations 3 and 9 on the proctologic clock face (κ = 0.320) and (κ = 0.336). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that the use of external phased array MRI is feasible for detecting obstetric anal sphincter lesions postpartum. This allows for imaging of the sphincter defects in centres where EAUS imaging is not available. KEY POINTS: • A two centre prospective study that showed external phased array MRI to be a valid imaging modality for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-26 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717181/ /pubmed/30915565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal
Kirss, Jaan
Huhtinen, Heikki
Niskanen, Eini
Ruohonen, Jyrki
Kallio-Packalen, Marja
Victorzon, Sarita
Victorzon, Mikael
Pinta, Tarja
Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title_full Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title_fullStr Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title_short Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
title_sort comparison of 3d endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries
topic Gastrointestinal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06125-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kirssjaan comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT huhtinenheikki comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT niskaneneini comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT ruohonenjyrki comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT kalliopackalenmarja comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT victorzonsarita comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT victorzonmikael comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries
AT pintatarja comparisonof3dendoanalultrasoundandexternalphasedarraymagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofobstetricanalsphincterinjuries