Cargando…

Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia

AIM: Safe consumption spaces (SCS) are indoor environments in which people can use drugs with trained personnel on site to provide overdose reversal and risk reduction services. SCS have been shown to reduce fatal overdoses, decrease public syringe disposal, and reduce public drug consumption. Exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Rourke, Allison, White, Rebecca Hamilton, Park, Ju Nyeong, Rodriguez, Kayla, Kilkenny, Michael E., Sherman, Susan G., Allen, Sean T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0320-8
_version_ 1783447537970053120
author O’Rourke, Allison
White, Rebecca Hamilton
Park, Ju Nyeong
Rodriguez, Kayla
Kilkenny, Michael E.
Sherman, Susan G.
Allen, Sean T.
author_facet O’Rourke, Allison
White, Rebecca Hamilton
Park, Ju Nyeong
Rodriguez, Kayla
Kilkenny, Michael E.
Sherman, Susan G.
Allen, Sean T.
author_sort O’Rourke, Allison
collection PubMed
description AIM: Safe consumption spaces (SCS) are indoor environments in which people can use drugs with trained personnel on site to provide overdose reversal and risk reduction services. SCS have been shown to reduce fatal overdoses, decrease public syringe disposal, and reduce public drug consumption. Existing SCS research in the USA has explored acceptability for the hypothetical use of SCS, but primarily among urban populations of people who inject drugs (PWID). Given the disproportionate impact of the opioid crisis in rural communities, this research examines hypothetical SCS acceptability among a rural sample of PWID in West Virginia. METHODS: Data were drawn from a 2018 cross-sectional survey of PWID (n = 373) who reported injection drug use in the previous 6 months and residence in Cabell County, West Virginia. Participants were asked about their hypothetical use of a SCS with responses dichotomized into two groups, likely and unlikely SCS users. Chi-square and t tests were conducted to identify differences between likely and unlikely SCS users across demographic, substance use, and health measures. RESULTS: Survey participants were 59.5% male, 83.4% non-Hispanic White, and 79.1% reported likely hypothetical SCS use. Hypothetical SCS users were significantly (p < .05) more likely to have recently (past 6 months) injected cocaine (38.3% vs. 25.7%), speedball (41.0% vs. 24.3%), and to report preferring drugs containing fentanyl (32.5% vs. 20.3%). Additionally, likely SCS users were significantly more likely to have recently experienced an overdose (46.8% vs. 32.4%), witnessed an overdose (78.3% vs. 60.8%), and received naloxone (51.2% vs. 37.8%). Likely SCS users were less likely to have borrowed a syringe from a friend (34.6% vs. 48.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Rural PWID engaging in high-risk behaviors perceive SCS as an acceptable harm reduction strategy. SCS may be a viable option to reduce overdose fatalities in rural communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67173452019-09-06 Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia O’Rourke, Allison White, Rebecca Hamilton Park, Ju Nyeong Rodriguez, Kayla Kilkenny, Michael E. Sherman, Susan G. Allen, Sean T. Harm Reduct J Brief Report AIM: Safe consumption spaces (SCS) are indoor environments in which people can use drugs with trained personnel on site to provide overdose reversal and risk reduction services. SCS have been shown to reduce fatal overdoses, decrease public syringe disposal, and reduce public drug consumption. Existing SCS research in the USA has explored acceptability for the hypothetical use of SCS, but primarily among urban populations of people who inject drugs (PWID). Given the disproportionate impact of the opioid crisis in rural communities, this research examines hypothetical SCS acceptability among a rural sample of PWID in West Virginia. METHODS: Data were drawn from a 2018 cross-sectional survey of PWID (n = 373) who reported injection drug use in the previous 6 months and residence in Cabell County, West Virginia. Participants were asked about their hypothetical use of a SCS with responses dichotomized into two groups, likely and unlikely SCS users. Chi-square and t tests were conducted to identify differences between likely and unlikely SCS users across demographic, substance use, and health measures. RESULTS: Survey participants were 59.5% male, 83.4% non-Hispanic White, and 79.1% reported likely hypothetical SCS use. Hypothetical SCS users were significantly (p < .05) more likely to have recently (past 6 months) injected cocaine (38.3% vs. 25.7%), speedball (41.0% vs. 24.3%), and to report preferring drugs containing fentanyl (32.5% vs. 20.3%). Additionally, likely SCS users were significantly more likely to have recently experienced an overdose (46.8% vs. 32.4%), witnessed an overdose (78.3% vs. 60.8%), and received naloxone (51.2% vs. 37.8%). Likely SCS users were less likely to have borrowed a syringe from a friend (34.6% vs. 48.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Rural PWID engaging in high-risk behaviors perceive SCS as an acceptable harm reduction strategy. SCS may be a viable option to reduce overdose fatalities in rural communities. BioMed Central 2019-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6717345/ /pubmed/31470864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0320-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Brief Report
O’Rourke, Allison
White, Rebecca Hamilton
Park, Ju Nyeong
Rodriguez, Kayla
Kilkenny, Michael E.
Sherman, Susan G.
Allen, Sean T.
Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title_full Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title_fullStr Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title_short Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia
title_sort acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural west virginia
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31470864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0320-8
work_keys_str_mv AT orourkeallison acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT whiterebeccahamilton acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT parkjunyeong acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT rodriguezkayla acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT kilkennymichaele acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT shermansusang acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia
AT allenseant acceptabilityofsafedrugconsumptionspacesamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugsinruralwestvirginia