Cargando…

Falsely Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Due to Presence of an Inhibitory Serum Factor: A Case Report and Review of Pertinent Literature

Patient: Male, 63 Final Diagnosis: Recurrent prostate cancer Symptoms: Falsely undetectable PSA Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Serum dilution Specialty: Urology OBJECTIVE: Unusual clinical course BACKGROUND: Few cases of falsely undetectable PSA due to the presence of an inhibitory serum factor h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loudas, Nicholas B., Killeen, Anthony A., Palamalai, Vikram, Weight, Christopher J., Rao, Arpit, Cho, L. Chinsoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31444319
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.917137
Descripción
Sumario:Patient: Male, 63 Final Diagnosis: Recurrent prostate cancer Symptoms: Falsely undetectable PSA Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Serum dilution Specialty: Urology OBJECTIVE: Unusual clinical course BACKGROUND: Few cases of falsely undetectable PSA due to the presence of an inhibitory serum factor have been reported in the world literature. We present a case of falsely low-to-undetectable PSA with data from a serum dilution series, the current literature on biochemical assay interference, and the implications for prostate cancer salvage treatment. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old man was treated with prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer and was found to have a rising PSA after approximately 3 years following surgery. He subsequently transferred his care to a different health system and was found to have an undetectable PSA. He was eventually found to have an elevated PSA once again after the particular assay at this institution was changed. He thus received salvage prostate radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: While falsely low PSA results cannot be explained by the presence of serum heterophile antibodies, competitive antibody interference against the immunoassay reagents or anti-PSA antibodies are possible explanations for the results of the dilution experiments performed in this case study. We suggest that unexpected PSA testing results should raise concern for assay interference and warrant further clinical workup.