Cargando…
Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489012 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439 |
_version_ | 1783447561590276096 |
---|---|
author | Gulsen, Secaattin Karatas, Erkan |
author_facet | Gulsen, Secaattin Karatas, Erkan |
author_sort | Gulsen, Secaattin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as a Group-I (endoscopic) and Group-II (microscopic). The audiometric measurements, duration of surgery, intraoperative findings and complications were recorded and evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the Group-I and II was 45.1±8.4 minutes and 48.7±5.6 minutes, respectively (p>0.05). The preoperative and postoperative average air-bone gap in the Group-I was 27.8±7.2 dB and 8.7±3.4 dB and these values in Group-II were 30.2±5.1 dB and 7.4±4.8 dB, respectively (p<0.001). The requirement of chorda tympani nerve manipulation and scutum curettage were significantly less in Group-I as compared Group-II (p<0.05). Dysgeusia and postoperative pain were observed significantly higher ratios in Group-II relative to Group-I (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery in terms of difficulty of prosthesis insertion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapes surgery provides comparable audiological outcomes, shorter operative times, fewer complications rates, and more minimally invasive surgery, relative to the microscopic approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6717452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67174522019-09-06 Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery Gulsen, Secaattin Karatas, Erkan Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as a Group-I (endoscopic) and Group-II (microscopic). The audiometric measurements, duration of surgery, intraoperative findings and complications were recorded and evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the Group-I and II was 45.1±8.4 minutes and 48.7±5.6 minutes, respectively (p>0.05). The preoperative and postoperative average air-bone gap in the Group-I was 27.8±7.2 dB and 8.7±3.4 dB and these values in Group-II were 30.2±5.1 dB and 7.4±4.8 dB, respectively (p<0.001). The requirement of chorda tympani nerve manipulation and scutum curettage were significantly less in Group-I as compared Group-II (p<0.05). Dysgeusia and postoperative pain were observed significantly higher ratios in Group-II relative to Group-I (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery in terms of difficulty of prosthesis insertion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapes surgery provides comparable audiological outcomes, shorter operative times, fewer complications rates, and more minimally invasive surgery, relative to the microscopic approach. Professional Medical Publications 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717452/ /pubmed/31489012 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gulsen, Secaattin Karatas, Erkan Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title | Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title_full | Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title_short | Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
title_sort | comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489012 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gulsensecaattin comparisonofsurgicalandaudiologicaloutcomesofendoscopicandmicroscopicapproachinstapessurgery AT karataserkan comparisonofsurgicalandaudiologicaloutcomesofendoscopicandmicroscopicapproachinstapessurgery |