Cargando…

Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery

OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulsen, Secaattin, Karatas, Erkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489012
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439
_version_ 1783447561590276096
author Gulsen, Secaattin
Karatas, Erkan
author_facet Gulsen, Secaattin
Karatas, Erkan
author_sort Gulsen, Secaattin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as a Group-I (endoscopic) and Group-II (microscopic). The audiometric measurements, duration of surgery, intraoperative findings and complications were recorded and evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the Group-I and II was 45.1±8.4 minutes and 48.7±5.6 minutes, respectively (p>0.05). The preoperative and postoperative average air-bone gap in the Group-I was 27.8±7.2 dB and 8.7±3.4 dB and these values in Group-II were 30.2±5.1 dB and 7.4±4.8 dB, respectively (p<0.001). The requirement of chorda tympani nerve manipulation and scutum curettage were significantly less in Group-I as compared Group-II (p<0.05). Dysgeusia and postoperative pain were observed significantly higher ratios in Group-II relative to Group-I (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery in terms of difficulty of prosthesis insertion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapes surgery provides comparable audiological outcomes, shorter operative times, fewer complications rates, and more minimally invasive surgery, relative to the microscopic approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67174522019-09-06 Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery Gulsen, Secaattin Karatas, Erkan Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to compare the surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery. METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent the stapes surgery with the endoscopic and microscopic approach between January 2012-November 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as a Group-I (endoscopic) and Group-II (microscopic). The audiometric measurements, duration of surgery, intraoperative findings and complications were recorded and evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean operative time for the Group-I and II was 45.1±8.4 minutes and 48.7±5.6 minutes, respectively (p>0.05). The preoperative and postoperative average air-bone gap in the Group-I was 27.8±7.2 dB and 8.7±3.4 dB and these values in Group-II were 30.2±5.1 dB and 7.4±4.8 dB, respectively (p<0.001). The requirement of chorda tympani nerve manipulation and scutum curettage were significantly less in Group-I as compared Group-II (p<0.05). Dysgeusia and postoperative pain were observed significantly higher ratios in Group-II relative to Group-I (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery in terms of difficulty of prosthesis insertion (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stapes surgery provides comparable audiological outcomes, shorter operative times, fewer complications rates, and more minimally invasive surgery, relative to the microscopic approach. Professional Medical Publications 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717452/ /pubmed/31489012 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gulsen, Secaattin
Karatas, Erkan
Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title_full Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title_short Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
title_sort comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489012
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.439
work_keys_str_mv AT gulsensecaattin comparisonofsurgicalandaudiologicaloutcomesofendoscopicandmicroscopicapproachinstapessurgery
AT karataserkan comparisonofsurgicalandaudiologicaloutcomesofendoscopicandmicroscopicapproachinstapessurgery