Cargando…

Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of high vs low dose rifaximin for primary prophylaxis of portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) in decompensated liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental double blind randomized study at Services Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Lahore from August 2017 to Aug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarwar, Shahid, Muhyuddin, Bushra, Aleem, Abdul, Nadeem, Muhammad Arif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489023
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.549
_version_ 1783447565337886720
author Sarwar, Shahid
Muhyuddin, Bushra
Aleem, Abdul
Nadeem, Muhammad Arif
author_facet Sarwar, Shahid
Muhyuddin, Bushra
Aleem, Abdul
Nadeem, Muhammad Arif
author_sort Sarwar, Shahid
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of high vs low dose rifaximin for primary prophylaxis of portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) in decompensated liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental double blind randomized study at Services Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Lahore from August 2017 to August 2018, patients of decompensated cirrhosis with no previous PSE were randomized to receive twice daily rifaximin 200mg in Group-A and 550mg in Group-B. Patients were followed for 6 months for development of PSE. RESULTS: In 75 included patients, mean age was 53.8(±10.7) years and male/female ratio was 0.97/1(37/38). After randomization, 34 (45.3%) patients were included in Group-A and 41 (54.7%) patients in Group-B. During 6 month follow up 24 (32%) patients developed PSE, 12 (35.2%) in Group-A and 12 (29.2%) in Group-B, difference was not significant (p value 0.57). In 6 months, 13 (17.3%) patient died, 6 (17.6%) in Group-A and 7 (17.07%) patients in Group-B, difference not significant (p value 0.94). Patients who died had higher bilirubin (p < 0.00), higher serum creatinine (p 0.05), high CTP score (p 0.04) and worse MELD score (p 0.004). CONCLUSION: Rifaximin is not effective for primary prophylaxis of overt hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67174682019-09-06 Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin Sarwar, Shahid Muhyuddin, Bushra Aleem, Abdul Nadeem, Muhammad Arif Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of high vs low dose rifaximin for primary prophylaxis of portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE) in decompensated liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental double blind randomized study at Services Institute of Medical Sciences (SIMS), Lahore from August 2017 to August 2018, patients of decompensated cirrhosis with no previous PSE were randomized to receive twice daily rifaximin 200mg in Group-A and 550mg in Group-B. Patients were followed for 6 months for development of PSE. RESULTS: In 75 included patients, mean age was 53.8(±10.7) years and male/female ratio was 0.97/1(37/38). After randomization, 34 (45.3%) patients were included in Group-A and 41 (54.7%) patients in Group-B. During 6 month follow up 24 (32%) patients developed PSE, 12 (35.2%) in Group-A and 12 (29.2%) in Group-B, difference was not significant (p value 0.57). In 6 months, 13 (17.3%) patient died, 6 (17.6%) in Group-A and 7 (17.07%) patients in Group-B, difference not significant (p value 0.94). Patients who died had higher bilirubin (p < 0.00), higher serum creatinine (p 0.05), high CTP score (p 0.04) and worse MELD score (p 0.004). CONCLUSION: Rifaximin is not effective for primary prophylaxis of overt hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis patients. Professional Medical Publications 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6717468/ /pubmed/31489023 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.549 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sarwar, Shahid
Muhyuddin, Bushra
Aleem, Abdul
Nadeem, Muhammad Arif
Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title_full Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title_fullStr Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title_full_unstemmed Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title_short Primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: Low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
title_sort primary prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated cirrhosis: low dose vs. full dose rifaximin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31489023
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.549
work_keys_str_mv AT sarwarshahid primaryprophylaxisofhepaticencephalopathyindecompensatedcirrhosislowdosevsfulldoserifaximin
AT muhyuddinbushra primaryprophylaxisofhepaticencephalopathyindecompensatedcirrhosislowdosevsfulldoserifaximin
AT aleemabdul primaryprophylaxisofhepaticencephalopathyindecompensatedcirrhosislowdosevsfulldoserifaximin
AT nadeemmuhammadarif primaryprophylaxisofhepaticencephalopathyindecompensatedcirrhosislowdosevsfulldoserifaximin