Cargando…

Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoidi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Defino, Helton L. A., Costa, Herton R. T., Nunes, Altacílio A., Nogueira Barbosa, Marcello, Romero, Valéria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31472691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1
_version_ 1783447589944819712
author Defino, Helton L. A.
Costa, Herton R. T.
Nunes, Altacílio A.
Nogueira Barbosa, Marcello
Romero, Valéria
author_facet Defino, Helton L. A.
Costa, Herton R. T.
Nunes, Altacílio A.
Nogueira Barbosa, Marcello
Romero, Valéria
author_sort Defino, Helton L. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18–65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). DISCUSSION: Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6717640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67176402019-09-06 Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol Defino, Helton L. A. Costa, Herton R. T. Nunes, Altacílio A. Nogueira Barbosa, Marcello Romero, Valéria BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18–65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). DISCUSSION: Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017. BioMed Central 2019-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6717640/ /pubmed/31472691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Defino, Helton L. A.
Costa, Herton R. T.
Nunes, Altacílio A.
Nogueira Barbosa, Marcello
Romero, Valéria
Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_full Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_fullStr Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_short Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
title_sort open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6717640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31472691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2763-1
work_keys_str_mv AT definoheltonla openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT costahertonrt openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT nunesaltacilioa openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT nogueirabarbosamarcello openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT romerovaleria openversusminimallyinvasivepercutaneoussurgeryforsurgicaltreatmentofthoracolumbarspinefracturesamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol